Influence of Data Splitting on Performance of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Shear Strength of Soil

被引:285
|
作者
Nguyen, Quang Hung [1 ]
Ly, Hai-Bang [2 ]
Ho, Lanh Si [2 ,3 ]
Al-Ansari, Nadhir [4 ]
Le, Hiep Van [5 ]
Tran, Van Quan [2 ]
Prakash, Indra [6 ]
Pham, Binh Thai [2 ]
机构
[1] Thuyloi Univ, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
[2] Univ Transport Technol, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
[3] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Adv Sci & Engn, Civil & Environm Engn Program, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 7398527, Japan
[4] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[5] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[6] Bhaskaracharya Inst Space Applicat & Geoinformat, Gandhinagar 382002, India
关键词
BIOGEOGRAPHY-BASED OPTIMIZATION; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; RANDOM FOREST; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; RESIDUAL STRENGTH; HYBRID; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1155/2021/4832864
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the performance of different machine learning (ML) algorithms, namely, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), and Boosting Trees (Boosted) algorithms, considering the influence of various training to testing ratios in predicting the soil shear strength, one of the most critical geotechnical engineering properties in civil engineering design and construction. For this aim, a database of 538 soil samples collected from the Long Phu 1 power plant project, Vietnam, was utilized to generate the datasets for the modeling process. Different ratios (i.e., 10/90, 20/80, 30/70, 40/60, 50/50, 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, and 90/10) were used to divide the datasets into the training and testing datasets for the performance assessment of models. Popular statistical indicators, such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Correlation Coefficient (R), were employed to evaluate the predictive capability of the models under different training and testing ratios. Besides, Monte Carlo simulation was simultaneously carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed models, taking into account the random sampling effect. The results showed that although all three ML models performed well, the ANN was the most accurate and statistically stable model after 1000 Monte Carlo simulations (Mean R = 0.9348) compared with other models such as Boosted (Mean R = 0.9192) and ELM (Mean R = 0.8703). Investigation on the performance of the models showed that the predictive capability of the ML models was greatly affected by the training/testing ratios, where the 70/30 one presented the best performance of the models. Concisely, the results presented herein showed an effective manner in selecting the appropriate ratios of datasets and the best ML model to predict the soil shear strength accurately, which would be helpful in the design and engineering phases of construction projects.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prediction of shear strength in UHPC beams using machine learning-based models and SHAP interpretation
    Ye, Meng
    Li, Lifeng
    Yoo, Doo-Yeol
    Li, Huihui
    Zhou, Cong
    Shao, Xudong
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2023, 408
  • [22] Development of prediction models for interlayer shear strength in asphalt pavement using machine learning and SHAP techniques
    AL-Jarazi, Rabea
    Rahman, Ali
    Ai, Changfa
    Al-Huda, Zaid
    Ariouat, Hamza
    [J]. ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2024, 25 (08) : 1720 - 1738
  • [23] Machine learning for soil-geosynthetic interface shear strength analysis
    Abenezer, T. T.
    Araujo, G. L. S.
    Evangelista, F., Jr.
    Gomes, R. M. S.
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS: LEADING THE WAY TO A RESILIENT PLANET, 12ICG 2023, 2024, : 705 - 710
  • [24] Shear strength prediction of reinforced concrete beams using machine learning
    Sandeep, M. S.
    Tiprak, Koravith
    Kaewunruen, Sakdirat
    Pheinsusom, Phoonsak
    Pansuk, Withit
    [J]. STRUCTURES, 2023, 47 : 1196 - 1211
  • [25] Machine Learning Regression Algorithms for Shear Strength Prediction of SFRC-DBs: Performance Evaluation and Comparisons
    Majdi Maabreh
    Ghassan Almasabha
    [J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2024, 49 : 4711 - 4727
  • [26] Machine Learning Regression Algorithms for Shear Strength Prediction of SFRC-DBs: Performance Evaluation and Comparisons
    Maabreh, Majdi
    Almasabha, Ghassan
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 49 (04) : 4711 - 4727
  • [27] Compressive Strength Prediction of Lightweight Concrete: Machine Learning Models
    Kumar, Aman
    Arora, Harish Chandra
    Kapoor, Nishant Raj
    Mohammed, Mazin Abed
    Kumar, Krishna
    Majumdar, Arnab
    Thinnukool, Orawit
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [28] Splitting tensile strength prediction of Metakaolin concrete using machine learning techniques
    Qiang Li
    Guoqi Ren
    Haoran Wang
    Qikeng Xu
    Jinquan Zhao
    Huifen Wang
    Yonggang Ding
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [29] Splitting tensile strength prediction of Metakaolin concrete using machine learning techniques
    Li, Qiang
    Ren, Guoqi
    Wang, Haoran
    Xu, Qikeng
    Zhao, Jinquan
    Wang, Huifen
    Ding, Yonggang
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [30] Prediction of compressive strength of high-performance concrete via automated machine learning models
    Meng, Xiangcheng
    [J]. MULTISCALE AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY MODELING EXPERIMENTS AND DESIGN, 2024, 7 (03) : 2207 - 2223