Psychometric evaluation of the English version 14-item resilience scale (RS) in an Australian outpatient population of men with prostate cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Pascoe, Liz [1 ]
Rahman, Muhammad Aziz [1 ,3 ]
Edvardsson, Kristina [1 ]
Jokwiro, Yangama [1 ]
McDonald, Ewan [1 ]
Lood, Qarin [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Edvardsson, David [1 ,4 ]
Li, Xia [5 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Coll Sci Hlth & Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Ctr Ageing & Hlth AgeCap, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Hlth & Rehabil,Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Umea Univ, Dept Nursing, Med Fac, Umea, Sweden
[5] La Trobe Univ, Coll Sci Hlth & Engn, Math & Stat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Resilience; Psychometrics; Adult; Prostate cancer; Hormone suppression therapy; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; HUMAN CAPACITY; TRAUMA; THRIVE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejon.2018.06.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Human resilience refers to the processes of positive adaptation and development in the context of perceived significant threats to an individual's life or function. This paper analyses the psychometric properties and performance of the English version 14-item Resilience Scale (RS) in an Australian outpatient sample of men (n = 209) with advanced prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to collect data from a purposive sample of men. The instrument's psychometric properties were rated against established criteria for reliability (internal consistency), construct validity (instrument dimensionality) and variability (floor and ceiling effect). Exploratory and confirmatory factor-analyses were performed. Results: The English version 14-item RS demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91). A greater than 15% ceiling effect suggested limited data variability. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that items in the instrument measured primarily as a single factor with a good model of fit (RMSEA = 0.059; TLI = 0. 950, CFI = 0.962). Conclusion: The English version 14-item RS had satisfactory psychometric properties to capture the concept of resilience in an Australian outpatient sample of men with advanced prostate cancer, with some questions regarding detection of variability for ceiling effect. Further psychometric evaluation of the instrument in other adult clinical settings is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 78
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条