Assessing Frailty with the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI): A Review of Reliability and Validity

被引:28
|
作者
Gobbens, Robbert J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Uchmanowicz, Izabella [4 ]
机构
[1] Inholland Univ Appl Sci, Fac Hlth Sports & Social Work, De Boelelaan 1109, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Zonnehuisgrp Amstelland, Amstelveen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Wroclaw Med Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Nursing, Div Nursing Internal Med Procedures, Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
older people; frailty; Tilburg Frailty Indicator; reliability; validity; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; REPORT SCREENING INSTRUMENTS; DWELLING OLDER PERSONS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; BRAZILIAN VERSION; HEALTH-CARE; PEOPLE; VALIDATION; ADULTS;
D O I
10.2147/CIA.S298191
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: The Tilburg Frailty Instrument (TFI) is an instrument for assessing frailty in community-dwelling older people. Since its development, many studies have been carried out examining the psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to provide a review of the main findings with regard to the reliability and validity of the TFI. Methods: We conducted a literature search in the PubMed and CINAHL databases on May 30, 2020. An inclusion criterion was the use of the entire TFI, part B, referring to the 15 components. No restrictions were placed on language or year of publication. Results: In total, 27 studies reported about the psychometric properties of the TFI. By far, most of the studies (n = 25) were focused on community-dwelling older people. Many studies showed that the internal consistency and test-retest reliability are good, which also applies for the criterion and construct validity. In many studies, adverse outcomes of interest were disability, increased health-care utilization, lower quality of life, and mortality. Regarding disability, studies predominantly show results that are excellent, with an area under the curve (AUC) >0.80. In addition, the TFI showed good associations with lower quality of life and the findings concerning mortality were at least acceptable. However, the association of the TFI with some indicators of health-care utilization can be indicated as poor (eg, visits to a general practitioner, hospitalization). Conclusion: Since population aging is occurring all over the world, it is important that the TFI is available and well known that it is a user-friendly instrument for assessing frailty and its psychometric properties being qualified as good. The findings of this assessment can support health-care professionals in selecting interventions to reduce frailty and delay its adverse outcomes, such as disability and lower quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 875
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The prediction of readmission and mortality by the domains and components of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) A prospective cohort study among acutely admitted older patients
    Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
    Andreasen, Jane
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2020, 89
  • [42] A Preliminary Study of the Effects of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator, Frailty Phenotype, and Silver Nanoparticle-Silver Needle Therapy in Senile Inpatients with Frailty
    Xie, Jun
    Yu, Qigui
    Yang, Linlin
    Sun, Yuanyuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 20 (10) : 6518 - 6524
  • [43] Determination of an Optimal Frailty Cutoff Score of Tilburg Frailty Indicator and Frailty Associated Factors in Community-Dwelling Turkish Older Adults
    Ozsoy, Gulsah
    Bulut, Esra Ates
    Gurpinar, Baris
    Ilcin, Nursen
    Isik, Ahmet Turan
    [J]. ANNALS OF GERIATRIC MEDICINE AND RESEARCH, 2021, 25 (04): : 294 - 300
  • [44] Portuguese version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Transcultural adaptation and psychometric validation
    Coelho, Tiago
    Santos, Rubim
    Paul, Constanca
    Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
    Fernandes, Lia
    [J]. GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 15 (08) : 951 - 960
  • [45] Danish version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator - Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validity pretest by cognitive interviewing
    Andreasen, Jane
    Sorensen, Erik E.
    Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
    Lund, Hans
    Aadahl, Mette
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2014, 59 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [46] Frailty in patients with acute coronary syndrome: comparison between tools for comprehensive geriatric assessment and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator
    Uchmanowicz, Izabella
    Lisiak, Magdalena
    Wontor, Radoslaw
    Loboz-Grudzien, Krystyna
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2015, 10 : 521 - 529
  • [47] The influence of frailty syndrome using the tilburg frailty Indicator (TFI) on the assessment of self-care abilities assessed with european heart failure self-care behavior scale (EHFScBS) in elderly
    Uchmanowicz, I. Izabella
    Wleklik, M.
    Obieglo, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2015, 17 : 105 - 105
  • [48] The Validity and Reliability of Korean Frailty Index
    Hwang, Hwan Sik
    Kwon, In Sun
    Park, Byung Joo
    Cho, Belong
    Yoon, Jong Lull
    Won, Chang Won
    [J]. ANNALS OF GERIATRIC MEDICINE AND RESEARCH, 2010, 14 (04): : 191 - 202
  • [49] Diagnostic Accuracy of the FRAIL Scale, Groningen Frailty Indicator, Tilburg Frailty Indicator, and PRISMA-7 for Frailty Screening Among Older Adults in Community Settings: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Vo, Nhi Thi
    Tu, Yu-Kang
    Lin, Kuan-Chia
    Chiu, Hsiao-Yean
    Huang, Hui-Chuan
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2024, 64 (06):
  • [50] Comparison of the frailty phenotype and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator regarding the prediction of quality of life in a two-year follow-up
    Coelho, T.
    Paul, C.
    Fernandes, L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 33 : S185 - S185