Assessing Frailty with the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI): A Review of Reliability and Validity

被引:28
|
作者
Gobbens, Robbert J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Uchmanowicz, Izabella [4 ]
机构
[1] Inholland Univ Appl Sci, Fac Hlth Sports & Social Work, De Boelelaan 1109, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Zonnehuisgrp Amstelland, Amstelveen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Wroclaw Med Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Nursing, Div Nursing Internal Med Procedures, Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
older people; frailty; Tilburg Frailty Indicator; reliability; validity; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; REPORT SCREENING INSTRUMENTS; DWELLING OLDER PERSONS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; BRAZILIAN VERSION; HEALTH-CARE; PEOPLE; VALIDATION; ADULTS;
D O I
10.2147/CIA.S298191
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: The Tilburg Frailty Instrument (TFI) is an instrument for assessing frailty in community-dwelling older people. Since its development, many studies have been carried out examining the psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to provide a review of the main findings with regard to the reliability and validity of the TFI. Methods: We conducted a literature search in the PubMed and CINAHL databases on May 30, 2020. An inclusion criterion was the use of the entire TFI, part B, referring to the 15 components. No restrictions were placed on language or year of publication. Results: In total, 27 studies reported about the psychometric properties of the TFI. By far, most of the studies (n = 25) were focused on community-dwelling older people. Many studies showed that the internal consistency and test-retest reliability are good, which also applies for the criterion and construct validity. In many studies, adverse outcomes of interest were disability, increased health-care utilization, lower quality of life, and mortality. Regarding disability, studies predominantly show results that are excellent, with an area under the curve (AUC) >0.80. In addition, the TFI showed good associations with lower quality of life and the findings concerning mortality were at least acceptable. However, the association of the TFI with some indicators of health-care utilization can be indicated as poor (eg, visits to a general practitioner, hospitalization). Conclusion: Since population aging is occurring all over the world, it is important that the TFI is available and well known that it is a user-friendly instrument for assessing frailty and its psychometric properties being qualified as good. The findings of this assessment can support health-care professionals in selecting interventions to reduce frailty and delay its adverse outcomes, such as disability and lower quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 875
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE POLISH VERSION OF THE TILBURG FRAILTY INDICATOR (TFI)
    Uchmanowicz, I.
    Jankowska-Polanska, B.
    Uchmanowicz, B.
    Kowalczuk, K.
    Gobbens, R. J. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FRAILTY & AGING, 2016, 5 (01): : 27 - 32
  • [2] The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI): New Evidence for Its Validity
    Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
    Boersma, Petra
    Uchmanowicz, Izabella
    Santiago, Livia Maria
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2020, 15 : 265 - 274
  • [3] Prediction of Mortality by the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI)
    Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
    van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
    Augustijn, Hans
    Goumans, Marleen
    van der Ploeg, Tjeerd
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 22 (03) : 607.e1 - 607.e6
  • [4] Reliability and validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) among Chinese community-dwelling older people
    Dong, Lijuan
    Liu, Na
    Tian, Xiaoyu
    Qiao, Xiaoxia
    Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
    Kane, Robert L.
    Wang, Cuili
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2017, 73 : 21 - 28
  • [5] THE TURKISH ADAPTATION OF THE TILBURG FRAILTY INDICATOR: A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY
    Arslan, Mehmet
    Meltem Koc, Esra
    Sozmen, Melih Kaan
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS-TURK GERIATRI DERGISI, 2018, 21 (02): : 173 - 183
  • [6] Reliability and Validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator in 5 European Countries
    Zhang, Xuxi
    Tan, Siok Swan
    Bilajac, Lovorka
    Alhambra-Borras, Tamara
    Garces-Ferrer, Jorge
    Verma, Arpana
    Koppelaar, Elin
    Markaki, Athina
    Mattace-Raso, Francesco
    Franse, Carmen Betsy
    Raat, Hein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (06) : 772 - +
  • [7] The construct validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator
    Robbert, Gobbens
    Marcel van, Assen
    Katrien, Luijkx
    Ria, Wijnen-Sponselee
    Jos, Schols
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2010, 19 : 147 - 147
  • [8] Predicting Disability Using a Nomogram of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI)
    Gobbens, Robbert J.
    Santiago, Livia M.
    Uchmanowicz, Izabella
    van der Ploeg, Tjeerd
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (08)
  • [9] Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Tilburg frailty indicator (TFI)
    Santiago, Livia Maria
    Luz, Laercio Lima
    Mattos, Ines Echenique
    Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
    van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2013, 57 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [10] The prediction of disability by self-reported physical frailty components of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI)
    Gobbens, R. J. J.
    van Assen, M. A. L. M.
    Schalk, M. J. D.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2014, 59 (02) : 280 - 287