Automated Machine Learning for High-Throughput Image-Based Plant Phenotyping

被引:51
|
作者
Koh, Joshua C. O. [1 ]
Spangenberg, German [2 ,3 ]
Kant, Surya [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Agr Victoria, Grains Innovat Pk,110 Natimuk Rd, Horsham, Vic 3400, Australia
[2] AgriBio, Agr Victoria, Ctr AgriBiosci, 5 Ring Rd, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Appl Syst Biol, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Agr Innovat, Sch Agr & Food, Fac Vet & Agr Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
automated machine learning; neural architecture search; high-throughput plant phenotyping; wheat lodging assessment; unmanned aerial vehicle; ARCHITECTURES; DEPTH; RGB;
D O I
10.3390/rs13050858
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Automated machine learning (AutoML) has been heralded as the next wave in artificial intelligence with its promise to deliver high-performance end-to-end machine learning pipelines with minimal effort from the user. However, despite AutoML showing great promise for computer vision tasks, to the best of our knowledge, no study has used AutoML for image-based plant phenotyping. To address this gap in knowledge, we examined the application of AutoML for image-based plant phenotyping using wheat lodging assessment with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery as an example. The performance of an open-source AutoML framework, AutoKeras, in image classification and regression tasks was compared to transfer learning using modern convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. For image classification, which classified plot images as lodged or non-lodged, transfer learning with Xception and DenseNet-201 achieved the best classification accuracy of 93.2%, whereas AutoKeras had a 92.4% accuracy. For image regression, which predicted lodging scores from plot images, transfer learning with DenseNet-201 had the best performance (R-2 = 0.8303, root mean-squared error (RMSE) = 9.55, mean absolute error (MAE) = 7.03, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 12.54%), followed closely by AutoKeras (R-2 = 0.8273, RMSE = 10.65, MAE = 8.24, MAPE = 13.87%). In both tasks, AutoKeras models had up to 40-fold faster inference times compared to the pretrained CNNs. AutoML has significant potential to enhance plant phenotyping capabilities applicable in crop breeding and precision agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High-throughput phenotyping of plant resistance to aphids by automated video tracking
    Karen J Kloth
    Cindy JM ten Broeke
    Manus PM Thoen
    Marianne Hanhart-van den Brink
    Gerrie L Wiegers
    Olga E Krips
    Lucas PJJ Noldus
    Marcel Dicke
    Maarten A Jongsma
    Plant Methods, 11
  • [22] High-throughput phenotyping of plant resistance to aphids by automated video tracking
    Kloth, Karen J.
    ten Broeke, Cindy J. M.
    Thoen, Manus P. M.
    den Brink, Marianne Hanhart-van
    Wiegers, Gerrie L.
    Krips, Olga E.
    Noldus, Lucas P. J. J.
    Dicke, Marcel
    Jongsma, Maarten A.
    PLANT METHODS, 2015, 11
  • [23] Deep learning: as the new frontier in high-throughput plant phenotyping
    Arya, Sunny
    Sandhu, Karansher Singh
    Singh, Jagmohan
    Kumar, Sudhir
    EUPHYTICA, 2022, 218 (04)
  • [24] Deep learning: as the new frontier in high-throughput plant phenotyping
    Sunny Arya
    Karansher Singh Sandhu
    Jagmohan Singh
    Sudhir kumar
    Euphytica, 2022, 218
  • [25] Identification and utilization of genetic determinants of trait measurement errors in image-based, high-throughput phenotyping
    Zhou, Yan
    Kusmec, Aaron
    Mirnezami, Seyed Vahid
    Attigala, Lakshmi
    Srinivasan, Srikant
    Jubery, Talukder Z.
    Schnable, James C.
    Salas-Fernandez, Maria G.
    Ganapathysubramanian, Baskar
    Schnable, Patrick S.
    PLANT CELL, 2021, 33 (08): : 2562 - 2582
  • [26] Image-Based High-Throughput Phenotyping of Cereals Early Vigor and Weed-Competitiveness Traits
    Aharon, Shlomi
    Peleg, Zvi
    Argaman, Eli
    Ben-David, Roi
    Lati, Ran N.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (23) : 1 - 17
  • [27] High-throughput chlorophyll fluorescence image-based phenotyping for water deficit stress tolerance in wheat
    Arya, Sunny
    Sahoo, Rabi N.
    Sehgal, V. K.
    Bandyopadhyay, Kalikinkar
    Rejith, R. G.
    Chinnusamy, Viswanathan
    Kumar, Sudhir
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    Manjaiah, K. M.
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 29 (02) : 278 - 293
  • [28] A Comprehensive Review of High Throughput Phenotyping and Machine Learning for Plant Stress Phenotyping
    Gill, Taqdeer
    Gill, Simranveer K.
    Saini, Dinesh K.
    Chopra, Yuvraj
    de Koff, Jason P.
    Sandhu, Karansher S.
    PHENOMICS, 2022, 2 (03): : 156 - 183
  • [29] A Comprehensive Review of High Throughput Phenotyping and Machine Learning for Plant Stress Phenotyping
    Taqdeer Gill
    Simranveer K. Gill
    Dinesh K. Saini
    Yuvraj Chopra
    Jason P. de Koff
    Karansher S. Sandhu
    Phenomics, 2022, 2 : 156 - 183
  • [30] Automated Protein Distribution Detection in High-Throughput Image-Based siRNA Library Screens
    Yan Nei Law
    Stephen Ogg
    John Common
    David Tan
    E. Birgitte Lane
    Andy M. Yip
    Hwee Kuan Lee
    Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 2009, 55 : 1 - 13