Risk and cost evaluation of port adaptation measures to climate change impacts

被引:72
|
作者
Yang, Zaili [1 ,3 ]
Ng, Adolf K. Y. [2 ,3 ]
Lee, Paul Tae-Woo [4 ]
Wang, Tianni [1 ,5 ]
Qu, Zhuohua [5 ]
Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez [6 ]
Pettit, Stephen [6 ]
Harris, Irina [6 ]
Zhang, Di [7 ,8 ]
Lau, Yui-yip [3 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Liverpool Logist Offshore & Marine Res Inst, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Manitoba, Asper Sch Business, Dept Supply Chain Management, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Asper Sch Business, Transport Inst, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[4] RMIT Univ, Sch Business IT & Logist, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Liverpool Business Sch, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[6] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Business Sch, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[7] Natl Engn Res Ctr Water Transport Safety, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[8] Wuhan Univ Technol, Intelligent Transportat Syst Res Ctr, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[9] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Hong Kong Community Coll, Div Business, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Climate change; Port; Adaptation; Maritime risk; Risk-cost modelling; Multiple criteria decision-making; Greater China; SEA-LEVEL RISE; INTEGRATED ANALYSIS; COASTAL; MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS; SAFETY; VULNERABILITY; STRATEGIES; SCENARIOS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The long term impact posed by climate change risk remains unclear and is subject to diverse interpretations from different maritime stakeholders. The inter-dynamics between climate change and ports can also significantly diversify in different geographical regions. Consequently, risk and cost data used to support climate adaptation is of high uncertainty and in many occasions, real data is often unavailable and incomplete. This paper presents a risk and cost evaluation methodology that can be applied to the analysis of port climate change adaptation measures in situations where data uncertainty is high. Risk and cost criteria are used in a decision-making model for the selection of climate adaptation measures. Information produced using a fuzzy-Bayesian risk analysis approach is utilized to evaluate risk reduction outcomes from the use of adaptation measures in ports. An evidential reasoning approach is then employed to synthesize the risk reduction data as inputs to the decision-making model. The results can assist policymakers in developing efficient adaptation measures that take into account the reduction in the likelihood of risks, their possible consequences, their timeframe, and costs incurred. A technical study across 14 major container ports in Greater China is presented to demonstrate the interaction between cost and risk analysis, and to highlight the applicability of the stated methodology in practice. The paper offers a useful analytical tool for assessing climate change risks to ports and selecting the most cost-effective adaptation measures in uncertain conditions. It can also be used to compare the practitioners' perceptions of climate risks across different geographical regions, and to evaluate improvements after implementation of the selected adaptation measures with potential budgetary constraints. The methodology, together with the illustrative cases, provides important insights on how to develop efficient climate change adaptation measures in a supply chain context to improve the sustainability of development and enhance adaptation measures for ports, port cities, intermodal transport, supply chains, and urban and regional planning in general. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 458
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Climate change impacts and adaptation assessment in Bangladesh
    Ali, A
    [J]. CLIMATE RESEARCH, 1999, 12 (2-3) : 109 - 116
  • [42] Adaptation to climate change impacts on water demand
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    Zhang, Jian-yun
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Guan, En-hong
    Wu, Yong-xiang
    Gao, Juan
    He, Rui-min
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2016, 21 (01) : 81 - 99
  • [43] Adaptation to climate change impacts on water demand
    Xiao-jun Wang
    Jian-yun Zhang
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    En-hong Guan
    Yong-xiang Wu
    Juan Gao
    Rui-min He
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2016, 21 : 81 - 99
  • [44] Adaptation to the infectious disease impacts of climate change
    Ebi, Kristie L.
    Lindgren, Elisabet
    Suk, Jonathan E.
    Semenza, Jan C.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 118 (02) : 355 - 365
  • [45] Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability
    Suter, Glenn
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 18 (04) : 1117 - 1118
  • [46] Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation
    Rojas-Downing, M. Melissa
    Nejadhashemi, A. Pouyan
    Harrigan, Timothy
    Woznicki, Sean A.
    [J]. CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 16 : 145 - 163
  • [47] Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability
    Birch, Eugenie L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2014, 80 (02) : 184 - 185
  • [48] Adaptation to the infectious disease impacts of climate change
    Kristie L. Ebi
    Elisabet Lindgren
    Jonathan E. Suk
    Jan C. Semenza
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2013, 118 : 355 - 365
  • [49] Adaptation of maize to climate change impacts in Iran
    Rooholla Moradi
    Alireza Koocheki
    Mehdi Nassiri Mahallati
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2014, 19 : 1223 - 1238
  • [50] Climate Change and Agricultural Soils: Impacts and Adaptation
    M.D.A. Rounsevell
    S.P. Evans
    P. Bullock
    [J]. Climatic Change, 1999, 43 : 683 - 709