Interphase cytogenetics in pathology: principles, methods, and applications of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

被引:22
|
作者
Werner, M
Wilkens, L
Aubele, M
Nolte, M
Zitzelsberger, H
Komminoth, P
机构
[1] HANNOVER MED SCH,INST PATHOL,HANNOVER,GERMANY
[2] GSF MUNICH,NATL RES CTR ENVIRONM & HLTH,MUNICH,GERMANY
[3] UNIV MUNICH,INST RADIOBIOL,MUNICH,GERMANY
[4] UNIV ZURICH,DEPT PATHOL,DIV CELL & MOL PATHOL,CH-8006 ZURICH,SWITZERLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s004180050179
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Characteristic chromosome aberrations have been identified in various tumors. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using specific probes that are generated by vector cloning or in vitro amplification and labeled with fluorescent dyes allow for the detection of these genetic changes in interphase cells. This technique, that is also referred to as ''interphase cytogenetics'', can be performed in cytological preparations as well as in sections of routinely formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue. In cancer research and diagnostics, interphase cytogenetics by FISH is used to detect numerical chromosome changes and structural aberrations, e.g., translocations, deletions, or amplifications. In this technical overview, we explain the principles of the FISH method and provide protocols for FISH in cytological preparations and paraffin sections. Moreover, possible applications of FISH are discussed. Most of the currently applied methods, e.g., conventional cytogenetics, analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms, or the various modifications of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), require in vitro cultivation of the tumor cells or tissue disaggregation and cell lysis. A close correlation with morphology, however, is necessary to elucidate the significance of molecular or cytogenetic findings associated with malignancy. In situ hybridization using appropriate DNA probes allows for the simultaneous assessment of chromosomal aberrations and morphological features in tumor specimens (Gray et al. 1994; Joos et al. 1994). With this technique, that is also referred to as ''interphase cytogenetics'', karyotypic changes can be analyzed at a single cell level. The major advantage of interphase cytogenetics is the possibility of examining chromosomal aberrations among morphologically or immunophenotypically different cells or cell groups that may be evident in an individual tumor sample. Therefore, interphase cytogenetics is especially useful for correlating molecular or cytogenetic alterations to morphological details in cytological preparations and tissue sections. The method of choice for interphase cytogenetics is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) which is performed with DNA probes that are labeled with fluorochromes. In this technical overview, we discuss the principles, applications, and limitations of FISH and provide elaborated protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 390
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Conventional Cytogenetics and Interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results in Multiple Myeloma: A Turkey Laboratory Analysis of 381 Cases
    Aydin, Cigdem
    Ulas, Turgay
    Hangul, Ceren
    Yucel, Orhan Kemal
    Iltar, Utku
    Salim, Ozan
    Ekinci, Deniz
    Karauzum, Sibel Berker
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY AND BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2020, 36 (02) : 284 - 291
  • [32] Conventional Cytogenetics and Interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results in Multiple Myeloma: A Turkey Laboratory Analysis of 381 Cases
    Cigdem Aydin
    Turgay Ulas
    Ceren Hangul
    Orhan Kemal Yucel
    Utku Iltar
    Ozan Salim
    Deniz Ekinci
    Sibel Berker Karauzum
    [J]. Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2020, 36 : 284 - 291
  • [33] Fluorescence-in-situ hybridization (FISH)
    Fischer, K
    Bentz, M
    Dohner, H
    [J]. MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 1997, 92 (05) : 279 - 283
  • [34] Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): A powerful method for the detection of genetic abnormalities in metaphases and in interphase nuclei
    Dierlamm, J
    Wlodarska, I
    Michaux, L
    Stefanova, M
    Seeger, D
    Hinz, K
    Hagemeijer, A
    Hossfeld, DK
    [J]. INFUSIONSTHERAPIE UND TRANSFUSIONSMEDIZIN, 1999, 26 (03): : 146 - 150
  • [35] Enumeration of interphase chromosomes - Comparison of visual in situ hybridization and confocal fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Becker, RL
    Mikel, UV
    Oliver, WR
    Sesterhenn, IA
    [J]. ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 1996, 18 (05): : 405 - 409
  • [36] Residual risk for cytogenetic abnormalities after prenatal diagnosis by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
    Homer, J
    Bhatt, S
    Huang, B
    Thangavelu, M
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2003, 23 (07) : 566 - 571
  • [37] Studies of metaphase and interphase chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Trask, B
    Friedman, C
    Massa, HF
    Singer, MJ
    Yokota, H
    [J]. CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1996, 74 (04): : 310 - 310
  • [38] Detection of newborn aneuploidy by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Jalal, SM
    Law, ME
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 72 (08) : 705 - 710
  • [39] Analysis of parathyroid neoplasms by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Erickson, LA
    Jalal, SM
    Harwood, A
    Shearer, B
    Jin, L
    Lloyd, RV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2004, 28 (05) : 578 - 584
  • [40] Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of early state prostate cancer.
    Sweet, J
    Beheshti, B
    Park, PC
    Marrano, P
    Jewett, MAS
    Trachtenberg, J
    Squire, JA
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2001, 81 (01) : 124A - 124A