Global evaluation of inhibitor impacts on ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils: A meta-analysis

被引:51
|
作者
Fan, Daijia [1 ]
He, Wentian [1 ]
Smith, Ward N. [2 ]
Drury, Craig F. [3 ]
Jiang, Rong [4 ]
Grant, Brian B. [2 ]
Shi, Yaoyao [1 ]
Song, Daping [1 ]
Chen, Yanhua [1 ]
Wang, Xuexia [1 ]
He, Ping [4 ]
Zou, Guoyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Inst Plant Nutr Resources & Environm, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Ottawa Res & Dev Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Harrow Res & Dev Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
ammonia volatilization; environmental condition; management practice; nitrification inhibitor; nitrous oxide emission; urease inhibitor; N-(N-BUTYL) THIOPHOSPHORIC TRIAMIDE; ENHANCED-EFFICIENCY FERTILIZERS; NITRIFICATION INHIBITORS; UREASE INHIBITOR; N2O EMISSIONS; 3,4-DIMETHYLPYRAZOLE PHOSPHATE; DICYANDIAMIDE DCD; GASEOUS EMISSIONS; WHEAT PRODUCTION; CROP PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.16294
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Inhibitors are widely considered an efficient tool for reducing nitrogen (N) loss and improving N use efficiency, but their effectiveness is highly variable across agroecosystems. In this study, we synthesized 182 studies (222 sites) worldwide to evaluate the impacts of inhibitors (urease inhibitors [UI], nitrification inhibitors [NI] and combined inhibitors) on crop yields and gaseous N loss (ammonia [NH3] and nitrous oxide [N2O] emissions) and explored their responses to different management and environmental factors including inhibitor application timing, fertilization regime, cropping system, water management, soil properties and climatic conditions using subgroup meta-analysis, meta-regression and multivariate analyses. The UI were most effective in enhancing crop yields (by 5%) and reducing NH3 volatilization (by 51%), whereas NI were most effective at reducing N2O emissions (by 49%). The application of UI mitigates NH3 loss and increases crop yields especially in high NH3-N loss scenarios, whereas NI application would minimize the net N2O emissions and the resultant environmental impacts especially in low NH3-N loss scenarios. Alternatively, the combined application of UI and NI enables producers to balance crop production and environmental conservation goals without pollution tradeoffs. The inhibitor efficacy for decreasing gaseous N loss was dependent upon soil and climatic conditions and management practices. Notably, both meta-regression and multivariate analyses suggest that inhibitors provide a greater opportunity for reducing fertilizer N inputs in high-N-surplus systems and presumably favor crop yield enhancement under soil N deficiency situations. The pursuit of an improved understanding of the interactions between plant-soil-climate-management systems and different types of inhibitors should continue to optimize the effectiveness of inhibitors for reducing environmental losses while increasing productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:5121 / 5141
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Restricted nitrous oxide emissions by ammonia oxidizers in two agricultural soils following excessive urea fertilization
    Zhaoming Chen
    Qiang Wang
    Jun Zhao
    Yudong Chen
    Huoyan Wang
    Junwei Ma
    Ping Zou
    Li Bao
    [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2020, 20 : 1502 - 1512
  • [32] Nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from urine-treated soils: Texture effect
    Singurindy, Olga
    Richards, Brian K.
    Molodovskaya, Marina
    Steenhuis, Tammo S.
    [J]. VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2006, 5 (04) : 1236 - 1245
  • [33] Effects of the nitrification inhibitor acetylene on nitrous oxide emissions and ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms of different agricultural soils under laboratory incubation conditions
    Liu, Rui
    Hayden, Helen L.
    Hu, Hangwei
    He, Jizheng
    Suter, Helen
    Chen, Deli
    [J]. APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2017, 119 : 80 - 90
  • [34] A review and meta-analysis of mitigation measures for nitrous oxide emissions from crop residues
    Abalos, Diego
    Recous, Sylvie
    Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
    De Notaris, Chiara
    Rittl, Tatiana F.
    Topp, Cairistiona F. E.
    Petersen, Soren O.
    Hansen, Sissel
    Bleken, Marina A.
    Rees, Robert M.
    Olesen, Jorgen E.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 828
  • [35] EMISSIONS OF NITROUS-OXIDE FROM SOILS
    DUXBURY, JM
    BOULDIN, DR
    TERRY, RE
    TATE, RL
    [J]. NATURE, 1982, 298 (5873) : 462 - 464
  • [36] Nitrous oxide emission from agricultural soils
    Liu, Junliang
    Tawfiq, Kamal
    Chen, Gang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2015, 7 (01) : 62 - 77
  • [37] Nitrous oxide emission from agricultural soils
    Beauchamp, EG
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1997, 77 (02) : 113 - 123
  • [38] Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions during solid waste composting with different additives: A meta-analysis
    Cao, Yubo
    Wang, Xuan
    Bai, Zhaohai
    Chadwick, David
    Misselbrook, Tom
    Sommer, Sven G.
    Qin, Wei
    Ma, Lin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 235 : 626 - 635
  • [39] Potential for mitigating global agricultural ammonia emission: A meta-analysis
    Ti, Chaopu
    Xia, Longlong
    Chang, Scott X.
    Yan, Xiaoyuan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 245 : 141 - 148
  • [40] Plants Mitigate Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Antibiotic-Contaminated Agricultural Soils
    Lin, Hui
    Yuan, Qianyu
    Yu, Qiaogang
    Chen, Zhaoming
    Ma, Junwei
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (08) : 4950 - 4960