Sugarcane growth and productivity under different tillage and crop systems.

被引:32
|
作者
Huertas Tavares, Orlando Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rural Rio Janeiro, Lab Fertilidade, Dept Solos, Inst Agron, BR-2389000 Seropedica, RJ, Brazil
来源
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY | 2010年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词
sugarcane; tillage systems; crop handling;
D O I
10.4025/actasciagron.v32i1.2051
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Sugarcane growth and productivity under different tillage and crop systems. This study had as its objective to evaluate the effects of different tillage and crop systems on the growth and productivity of sugarcane plants. The experiment was conducted in Linhares, ES. It is one of the oldest assays in the country investigating the effects of unburned and burned sugarcane. Installed in a Yellow Latosol with sandy/medium texture, the treatments consisted of plots (conventional and minimum tillage) and subplots (raw and burned sugarcane). Plant growth, contribution of organic matter and quantification of sugarcane yield were evaluated. The diameter was larger for minimum tillage, and tillering was greater for conventional tillage. The height and tillering were superior in the cut without burning. For stems productivity, the treatments did not present significant differences. The leaves were larger in minimum tillage and lips in unburned cane. The minimum tillage propitiates the increase in diameter initially and largest productivity of leaves in the crop. Tillering is favored by conventional tillage. The unburned cane did not present negative influence of straw in the regrowth. After 16 years of sugarcane cultivation with and without straw burning, it resulted in larger productivity of pointers increasing the productivity of the stems in unburned cane.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 68
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Physicochemical properties of chernozem and crop productivity in primary tillage systems in crop rotation
    I. M. Nikul’nikov
    O. K. Borontov
    Russian Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 35 (2) : 106 - 109
  • [22] SOIL AND CROP RESPONSES TO DIFFERENT TILLAGE SYSTEMS
    COMIA, RA
    STENBERG, M
    NELSON, P
    RYDBERG, T
    HAKANSSON, I
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1994, 29 (04): : 335 - 355
  • [23] Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcane
    Silva-Olaya, A. M.
    Cerri, C. E. P.
    La Scala, N., Jr.
    Dias, C. T. S.
    Cerri, C. C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [24] Sugarcane Crop Area, Production, and Productivity Growth Rates in India
    Padmavathi, J.
    Ravi, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2022, 14 (05) : 3178 - 3181
  • [25] A global dataset for crop production under conventional tillage and no tillage systems
    Yang Su
    Benoit Gabrielle
    David Makowski
    Scientific Data, 8
  • [26] A global dataset for crop production under conventional tillage and no tillage systems
    Su, Yang
    Gabrielle, Benoit
    Makowski, David
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [27] Soil bulk density and penetration resistance under different tillage and crop management systems and their relationship with barley root growth
    Lampurlanés, J
    Cantero-Martínez, C
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (03) : 526 - 536
  • [28] GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY OF GROUNDNUT (Arachis hypogaea) UNDER DIFFERENT TILLAGE AND SOWING METHODS IN INDIA
    Patro, Hrusikesh
    Alim, Abdul
    Dash, Debiprasad
    APPLIED BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (02) : 209 - 213
  • [29] Multivariate analysis of soil fauna under different soil tillage and crop management systems
    Baretta, Dilmar
    Mafra, Alvaro Luiz
    Pires Santos, Julio Cesar
    Talamini do Amarante, Cassandro Vidal
    Bertol, Ildegardis
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2006, 41 (11) : 1675 - 1679
  • [30] Economic analysis of organic cropping systems under different tillage intensities and crop rotations
    Dayananda, Buwani
    Fernandez, Myriam R.
    Lokuruge, Prabhath
    Zentner, Robert P.
    Schellenberg, Michael P.
    RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2021, 36 (05) : 509 - 516