Granger Causality: A Review and Recent Advances

被引:84
|
作者
Shojaie, Ali [1 ]
Fox, Emily B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
multivariate time series; vector autoregressive model; graphical models; penalized estimation; deep neural networks; mixed-frequency time series; DIRECTED INFORMATION; VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIONS; TEMPORAL AGGREGATION; REGULATORY NETWORKS; MODEL; NUMBER; IDENTIFICATION; REGRESSION; SELECTION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-statistics-040120-010930
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Introduced more than a half-century ago, Granger causality has become a popular tool for analyzing time series data in many application domains, from economics and finance to genomics and neuroscience. Despite this popularity, the validity of this framework for inferring causal relationships among time series has remained the topic of continuous debate. Moreover, while the original definition was general, limitations in computational tools have constrained the applications of Granger causality to primarily simple bivariate vector autoregressive processes. Starting with a review of early developments and debates, this article discusses recent advances that address various shortcomings of the earlier approaches, from models for high-dimensional time series to more recent developments that account for nonlinear and non-Gaussian observations and allow for subsampled and mixed-frequency time series.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 319
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shortcomings/Limitations of Blockwise Granger Causality and Advances of Blockwise New Causality
    Hu, Sanqing
    Jia, Xinxin
    Zhang, Jianhai
    Kong, Wanzeng
    Cao, Yu
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2016, 27 (12) : 2588 - 2601
  • [2] A review of the Granger-causality fallacy
    Maziarz, Mariusz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 8 (02): : 86 - 105
  • [3] MILITARY EXPENDITURE AND GRANGER CAUSALITY: A CRITICAL REVIEW
    Dunne, J. Paul
    Smith, Ron P.
    [J]. DEFENCE AND PEACE ECONOMICS, 2010, 21 (5-6) : 427 - 441
  • [4] Conditional Granger causality and partitioned Granger causality: differences and similarities
    Malekpour, Sheida
    Sethares, William A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 2015, 109 (06) : 627 - 637
  • [5] Conditional Granger causality and partitioned Granger causality: differences and similarities
    Sheida Malekpour
    William A. Sethares
    [J]. Biological Cybernetics, 2015, 109 : 627 - 637
  • [6] On the role of sulfates in recent global warming: a Granger causality analysis
    Pasini, Antonello
    Triacca, Umberto
    Attanasio, Alessandro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2015, 35 (12) : 3701 - 3706
  • [7] Multiscale Granger causality
    Faes, Luca
    Nollo, Giandomenico
    Stramaglia, Sebastiano
    Marinazzo, Daniele
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2017, 96 (04)
  • [8] Granger causality revisited
    Friston, Karl J.
    Bastos, Andre M.
    Oswal, Ashwini
    van Wijk, Bernadette
    Richter, Craig
    Litvak, Vladimir
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 101 : 796 - 808
  • [9] Local Granger causality
    Stramaglia, Sebastiano
    Scagliarini, Tomas
    Antonacci, Yuri
    Faes, Luca
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2021, 103 (02)
  • [10] Neural Granger Causality
    Tank, Alex
    Covert, Ian
    Foti, Nicholas
    Shojaie, Ali
    Fox, Emily B.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 44 (08) : 4267 - 4279