Characterizing gait abnormalities in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a neuromuscular analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Haddas, Ram [1 ]
Cox, Joseph [1 ]
Belanger, Theodore [2 ]
Ju, Kevin L. [2 ]
Derman, Peter B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Back Inst, 6020 West Parker Rd, Plano, TX 75093 USA
[2] Texas Back Inst, Rockwall, TX USA
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2019年 / 19卷 / 11期
关键词
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Electromyographic; Gait; Integrated electromyography; Muscle onset; Neuromuscular analysis; VOLITIONAL SPINE STABILIZATION; SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION; COORDINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.005
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Gait impairment is a hallmark of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). It has been shown to affect quality of life but has not been well defined. Further electromyographic (EMG) characterization of the gait cycle may help elucidate the true neuromuscular pathology with implications on prognosis and rehabilitation techniques. PURPOSE: This study compares neuromuscular activity in patients with CSM to that of healthy age-matched controls. STUDY DESIGN: Nonrandomized, prospective, concurrent control cohort study. METHODS: Neuromuscular activity was measured in 40 patients with symptomatic CSM during a series of over-ground gait trials at a self-selected speed before surgical intervention. External oblique, multifidus, erector spinae, rectus femoris, semitendinosus, tibialis anterior, medial gastrocnemius, and medial deltoid were assessed. Identical measurements were taken in 25 healthy control patients. Differences in time of muscle onset, peak EMG, time to peak EMG, and integrated electromyography (iEMG) were assessed using one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between patients with CSM and healthy controls with respect to time of muscle contraction onset. Peak EMG muscle activity was significantly higher in the medial deltoid of patients with CSM (39.3% vs. 23.3% sMVC, p=.042), but no other differences were seen in the remaining muscles tested. They also demonstrated significantly longer time to peak EMG muscle activity compared with controls in 5 of the 8 muscles tested, including the multifidus (20.2 vs. 16.8 ms, p=.050), erector spinae (18.2 vs. 8.9 ms, p<. 001), semitendinosis (26.3 vs. 22.4 ms, p=.037), tibialis anterior (14.7 vs. 11.0 ms, p=.050), and medial deltoid (24.2 vs. 9.2 ms, p<.001). Compared with controls, patients with CSM demonstrated significantly higher iEMG activity in the semitendinosis (586.5% vs. 272.5 sMVC, p=.047) and medial deltoid (87.62% vs. 22.5% sMVC, p=.008). CONCLUSIONS: The onset of muscle activity is not delayed in CSM patients, but many key muscles take longer to fully contract. This produces a situation in which patients with CSM are unable to fully fire their muscles with sufficient speed to maintain a normal gait. The core and lower extremity muscles do not contract with increased peak amplitude in response, but the deltoid and hamstring muscles are more active, suggesting compensatory activity as patients attempt to maintain balance. The end result is less efficient ambulation. These findings provide a more nuanced understanding of gait in individuals suffering from CSM and may have implications on rehabilitation protocols. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1803 / 1808
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条