Assessment of GPT2 Empirical Troposphere Model and Application Analysis in Precise Point Positioning

被引:6
|
作者
Chen, Weirong [1 ]
Gao, Chengfa [1 ]
Pan, Shuguo [2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Transportat, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Instrument Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Global pressure and temperature 2; Zenith troposphere delay; Mapping function; Precise point positioning; Global navigation satellite system; MAPPING FUNCTIONS; GPS; DELAY; INTERFEROMETRY; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-642-54743-0_37
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Precise Point Positioning (PPP) has been demonstrated to be a powerful tool in geodetic applications, such as deformation monitoring. Troposphere delay is an important error source which directly affects positioning accuracy in height direction. At the end of 2012, an improved model named Global Pressure and Temperature 2 (GPT2) was proposed. Compared with early empirical models, this new model mainly eliminates the weakness of limited spatial and temporal variability. In this study, we assess the precision of GPT2 model and apply it in PPP analysis. The analysis data of VMF1, which is produced using European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), provides the nearly true value of zenith delays and mapping function for International GNSS Service (IGS) stations. Therefore a globally distributed set of 11 IGS stations is chosen to validate GPT2 model. In the case of using GPT2 as a priori model while the residual zenith delay still estimated with other unknown parameters, it would improve the zenith troposphere delay adjustments to nearly zero-mean. Therefore GPT2 is helpful to improve the efficiency in PPP data processing. However, GPT2 model is only resting upon a global 5 degrees grid and sufficient global troposphere models are not yet available. Due to the complexity of wet zenith delay, PPP height solutions would be unsatisfactory when residual troposphere delay is not parameterized. We conclude that GPT2 is capable of predicting troposphere delay worldwide with an acceptable uncertainty. And GPT2-based PPP solution performs well only in the case of regarding residual model error as an additional unknown parameter.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 463
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An evaluation of real-time troposphere estimation based on GNSS Precise Point Positioning
    Ding, Wenwu
    Teferle, Felix Norman
    Kazmierski, Kamil
    Laurichesse, Denis
    Yuan, Yunbin
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2017, 122 (05) : 2779 - 2790
  • [22] Assessment of the accuracy and convergence period of Precise Point Positioning
    Abou-Galala, Mohammed
    Rabah, Mostafa
    Kaloop, Mosbeh
    Zidan, Zaki M.
    ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 57 (03) : 1721 - 1726
  • [23] Application of Precise Point Positioning for Island Control Survey
    Li, Kaifeng
    Ouyang, Yongzhong
    Lu, Xiuping
    Xu, Weiming
    Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2015, 40 (03): : 412 - 416
  • [24] GNSS processing modules and their application to Precise Point Positioning
    Lopez, Ernesto M.
    Rodriguez, Santiago
    Garcia, Javier G.
    Muravchik, Carlos H.
    2018 ARGENTINE CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL (AADECA), 2018,
  • [25] Accuracy Analysis of GPS Precise Point Positioning
    Zhang, Dandan
    Zhou, Mei
    Li, Jingmei
    CSNC 2011: 2ND CHINA SATELLITE NAVIGATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2011, : 108 - 112
  • [26] Analysis of ambiguity fixing in precise point positioning
    Yao, Yibin
    Peng, Wenfei
    Kong, Jian
    Zhang, Bao
    Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2013, 38 (11): : 1281 - 1285
  • [27] Modelling Tropospheric Delays Using the Global Surface Meteorological Parameter Model GPT2
    Rozsa, Szabolcs
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 58 (04): : 301 - 308
  • [28] Near-real-time regional troposphere models for the GNSS precise point positioning technique
    Hadas, T.
    Kaplon, J.
    Bosy, J.
    Sierny, J.
    Wilgan, K.
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 24 (05)
  • [29] A Worldwide Ionospheric Model for Fast Precise Point Positioning
    Rovira-Garcia, Adria
    Miguel Juan, Jose
    Sanz, Jaume
    Gonzalez-Casado, Guillermo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 53 (08): : 4596 - 4604
  • [30] Positioning performance analysis on combined GPS/BDS precise point positioning
    Jing Xiong
    Fei Han
    Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2020, 11 (01) : 78 - 83