Nasal air sampling used for the assessment of occupational allergen exposure and the efficacy of respiratory protection

被引:32
|
作者
Renström, A
Karlsson, AS
Tovey, E
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Natl Inst Environm Med, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Sydney, Dept Med, Inst Resp Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY | 2002年 / 32卷 / 12期
关键词
airborne; allergen; mouse; occupational; rat; respiratory protection;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01545.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Occupational exposure to rodent allergens may cause laboratory animal allergy. Personal exposure to occupational allergens is measured by collecting airborne dust on filters using person-carried pumps. This technique cannot be used to evaluate personal protective respiratory equipment. Recently developed intranasal air samplers collect inhaled particles by impaction on adhesive strips within the samplers. Objective The aims were to compare rodent aeroallergen exposure assessment using nasal air samplers with personal air sampling, and to evaluate the efficacy of using respiratory protection during rodent work using nasal air samplers. Methods Aeroallergen exposure was assessed during rodent work using both nasal air samplers and personal air samplers. The efficacy of respiratory protection (P2 facemasks and fresh-air helmets) was studied in subject pairs working side by side, one person with protection, the other without. Right nostril samples were laminated with protein-binding membrane and immunostained for rat urinary allergen-containing particles. Left nostril samples and air samples were eluted in buffer and analysed in amplified ELISAs for rat (RUA) and mouse (MUA) urinary allergen content (detection limit 10 pg/mL). Allergen collection efficacy of the nasal air samplers was tested at high and low exposure levels and at different flow rates using static sampling. Results P2 facemasks decreased the amount of inhaled allergen by about 90%, and very little allergen was inhaled using fresh-air helmets. Allergen levels in air and nasal samples correlated well (r (s) was about 0.8 for both RUA and MUA). The number of RUA-positive particles and nasal allergen levels measured in ELISA also correlated significantly (r (s) = 0.8). Collection efficacy of the nasal air sampler was better during high exposure (cleaning cages, median 73% of allergenic particles collected), than during low exposure (undisturbed room, 49% of particles). Conclusion Nasal air sampling is a relevant and sensitive complement to personal air sampling and enables evaluation of personal respiratory protection equipment. Use of P2 facemasks and fresh-air helmets may substantially reduce occupational exposure to inhaled allergens.
引用
收藏
页码:1769 / 1775
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A NONTRADITIONAL APPROACH TO RISK ASSESSMENT OF RESPIRATORY EXPOSURE TO OUTDOOR AIR-POLLUTANTS
    REICHRTOVA, E
    FOLTINOVA, J
    TAKAC, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG, 1995, 8 (03): : 233 - 241
  • [42] Efficacy of a hand protection cream used alone followed by in a regimen in subjects with occupational irritant contact dermatitis
    Humbert, Philippe
    Fanian, Ferial
    Meckfessel, Matthew H.
    Grivet-Seyve, Mathieu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 76 (06) : AB118 - AB118
  • [43] OCCUPATIONAL AND PUBLIC FIELD EXPOSURE FROM COMMUNICATION, NAVIGATION, AND RADAR SYSTEMS USED FOR AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL
    Joseph, Wout
    Goeminne, Francis
    Vermeeren, Gunter
    Verloock, Leen
    Martens, Luc
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2012, 103 (06): : 750 - 762
  • [44] Review of generic scenario environmental release and occupational exposure models used in chemical risk assessment
    Barrett, William M.
    Meyer, David E.
    Smith, Raymond L.
    Takkellapati, Sudhakar
    Gonzalez, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2023, 20 (11) : 545 - 562
  • [45] Retrospective assessment of occupational asbestos exposure among respiratory cancer patients. Preliminary results
    Everatt, RP
    Kuciauskaite, A
    Jankauskas, R
    Cicenas, S
    Smolianskiene, G
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, : 218 - 222
  • [46] Personal air sampling and biological monitoring of occupational exposure to the soil fumigant cis-1,3-dichloropropene
    Brouwer, EJ
    Verplanke, AJW
    Boogaard, PJ
    Bloemen, LJ
    Van Sittert, NJ
    Christian, FE
    Stokkentreeff, M
    Dijksterhuis, A
    Mulder, A
    De Wolff, FA
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2000, 57 (11) : 738 - 744
  • [47] RESPIRATORY EXPOSURE TO ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDES - OBSERVATIONS ON EFFECTIVENESS OF RESPIRATORY PROTECTION IN PREVENTING POISONING FROM OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO PARATHION AND 2-CARBOMETHOXY-1-METHYLVINYLDIMETHYL PHOSPHATE
    HARTWELL, WV
    HAYES, GR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1965, 11 (04): : 564 - 568
  • [48] Occupational Health and Safety Assessment of Exposure to Jet Fuel Combustion Products in Air Medical Transport
    MacDonald, Russell D.
    Thomas, Laura
    Rusk, Frederick C.
    Marques, Shauna D.
    McGuire, Dan
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2010, 14 (02) : 202 - 208
  • [49] Occupational Exposure to Mercury: Air Exposure Assessment and Biological Monitoring based on Dispersive Ionic Liquid-Liquid Microextraction
    Shirkhanloo, Hamid
    Golbabaei, Farideh
    Hassani, Hamid
    Eftekhar, Farrokh
    Kian, Mohammad Javad
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 43 (06) : 793 - 799
  • [50] Efficacy of Do-It-Yourself air filtration units in reducing exposure to simulated respiratory aerosols
    Derk, Raymond C.
    Coyle, Jayme P.
    Lindsley, William G.
    Blachere, Francoise M.
    Lemons, Angela R.
    Service, Samantha K.
    Martin Jr, Stephen B.
    Mead, Kenneth R.
    Fotta, Steven A.
    Reynolds, Jeffrey S.
    McKinney, Walter G.
    Sinsel, Erik W.
    Beezhold, Donald H.
    Noti, John D.
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 229