Effects of R&D Investments and Market Signals on International Acquisitions: Evidence from IPO Firms

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Cheng-Wei [1 ]
Reuer, Jeffrey J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Management, Dept Int Business, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[2] Univ Colorado, Leeds Sch Business, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
international acquisitions; R&D intensity; signaling theory; CROSS-BORDER ACQUISITIONS; INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; PARTNER SELECTION; ANALYST COVERAGE; TOBINS-Q; PERFORMANCE; MERGERS; DIVERSIFICATION; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.3390/jrfm14050191
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate how intangible assets in the form of R&D influence firms' hazards of engaging in international acquisitions. On the one hand, previous research has noted that the tacit and redeployable nature of R&D investments may prompt firms to expand their operations overseas and create value from international acquisitions. On the other hand, it is difficult for other firms to evaluate the quality and prospects of an acquirer's intangible resources, thereby hampering its ability to finance and execute international M&A deals. In the context of international acquisitions undertaken by firms just completing their initial public offerings (IPOs), we argue and find that the IPO firm's engagement in post-IPO international acquisition activity is generally negatively related to its R&D intensity. This effect contrasts previous arguments on the internalization advantages possessed by R&D-intensive firms. We also argue that firms able to convey their resources and prospects through such signals as previous international alliances and foreign sales can mitigate information problems presented by their intangibles, and thus carry out and benefit from cross-border acquisitions. We therefore identify an unexamined tradeoff that R&D investments present in the international M&A context and discuss how international signals can facilitate cross-border transactions subject to various market frictions.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Union structure and firms' incentives for cooperative R&D investments
    Manasakis, Constantine
    Petrakis, Emmanuel
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2009, 42 (02): : 665 - 693
  • [32] R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective
    Block, Joern H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2012, 27 (02) : 248 - 265
  • [33] Investment opportunities and R&D investments in family and nonfamily firms
    Miroshnychenko, Ivan
    Barontini, Roberto
    De Massis, Alfredo
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2020, 50 (04) : 447 - 461
  • [34] Motives for international cooperation on R&D and innovation: empirical evidence from Argentinean and Spanish firms
    Edwards-Schachter, Monica
    Castro-Martinez, Elena
    Sanchez-Barrioluengo, Mabel
    Anllo, Guillermo
    Fernandez-De-Lucio, Ignacio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2013, 62 (2-4) : 128 - 151
  • [35] Testing the effect of investments in IT and R&D on labour productivity: New method and evidence for Indian firms
    Khanna, Rupika
    Sharma, Chandan
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 173 : 30 - 34
  • [36] Innovation in R&D service firms: evidence from the UK
    Li, Xiuqin
    Gagliardi, Dimitri
    Miles, Ian
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2019, 31 (06) : 732 - 748
  • [37] Firms size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy
    Audretsch, DB
    Vivarelli, M
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 1996, 8 (03) : 249 - 258
  • [38] R&D spillover effects on firms' export behavior: evidence from South Korea
    Kim, Minjung
    Choi, Moon Jung
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (28) : 3066 - 3080
  • [39] The IPO market as a screening device and the going public decision: Evidence from acquisitions of privately and publicly held firms
    Mantecon T.
    Thistle P.D.
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2011, 37 (3) : 325 - 361
  • [40] R&D Investments in Markets with Network Effects
    Małgorzata Knauff
    Adam Karbowski
    [J]. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2021, 21 : 225 - 250