Is Mammographic Breast Density an Endophenotype for Breast Cancer?

被引:4
|
作者
Darcey, Ellie [1 ]
McCarthy, Nina [2 ]
Moses, Eric K. [3 ]
Saunders, Christobel [4 ]
Cadby, Gemma [1 ]
Stone, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Genet Epidemiol Grp, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Biomed Sci, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
mammographic breast density; breast cancer; risk factor; endophenotype; RISK; HERITABILITY; TAMOXIFEN; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3390/cancers13153916
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Candidate endophenotypes should be systematically assessed against five criteria: (i) the endophenotype is associated with disease in the population; (ii) the endophenotype is heritable; (iii) within families, endophenotype and disease co-segregate; (iv) the endophenotype found in affected family members is found in non-affected family members at a higher rate than in the general population and (v) the endophenotype is primarily state independent (manifests in an individual whether or not disease is active). This study assesses the suitability of mammographic breast density as an endophenotype for breast cancer. Formally establishing a trait as a disease endophenotype confirms that the trait and endophenotype share a biological basis, thereby enabling genetic dissection of an endophenotype to inform disease risk. As breast density can be measured for any woman who has had a mammogram, studies investigating the genetic architecture of breast density could identify breast cancer risk variants that act through effects on this trait. Mammographic breast density (MBD) is a strong and highly heritable predictor of breast cancer risk and a biomarker for the disease. This study systematically assesses MBD as an endophenotype for breast cancer-a quantitative trait that is heritable and genetically correlated with disease risk. Using data from the family-based kConFab Study and the 1994/1995 cross-sectional Busselton Health Study, participants were divided into three status groups-cases, relatives of cases and controls. Participant's mammograms were used to measure absolute dense area (DA) and percentage dense area (PDA). To address each endophenotype criterion, linear mixed models and heritability analysis were conducted. Both measures of MBD were significantly associated with breast cancer risk in two independent samples. These measures were also highly heritable. Meta-analyses of both studies showed that MBD measures were higher in cases compared to relatives (beta = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.10, 0.86 and beta = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.06, 0.78 for DA and PDA, respectively) and in relatives compared to controls (beta = 0.16, 95% CI = -0.24, 0.56 and beta = 0.16, 95% CI = -0.21, 0.53 for DA and PDA, respectively). This study formally demonstrates, for the first time, that MBD is an endophenotype for breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer
    Boyd, Norman F.
    Guo, Helen
    Martin, Lisa J.
    Sun, Limei
    Stone, Jennifer
    Fishell, Eve
    Jong, Roberta A.
    Hislop, Greg
    Chiarelli, Anna
    Minkin, Salomon
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03): : 227 - 236
  • [42] Volume of Mammographic Density and Risk of Breast Cancer
    Shepherd, John A.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Ma, Lin
    Duewer, Frederick
    Fan, Bo
    Wang, Jeff
    Malkov, Serghei
    Vittinghoff, Eric
    Cummings, Steven R.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (07) : 1473 - 1482
  • [43] Is mammographic density a marker of breast cancer phenotypes?
    Ibrahem H. Kanbayti
    William I. D. Rae
    Mark F. McEntee
    Meteb Al-Foheidi
    Sawsan Ashour
    Smeera A. Turson
    Ernest U. Ekpo
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2020, 31 : 749 - 765
  • [44] Diabetes, breast cancer and mammographic density in the Minnesota breast cancer family study
    Jensen, Leif E.
    Sellers, Thomas A.
    Vierkant, Robert A.
    Frederickson, Zachary S.
    Cerhan, James R.
    Pankratz, V. S.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 66 (08)
  • [45] Association of diabetes with mammographic breast density and breast cancer in the Minnesota breast cancer family study
    Thomas A. Sellers
    Leif E. Jensen
    Robert A. Vierkant
    Zachary S. Fredericksen
    Kathleen R. Brandt
    Anna R. Giuliano
    Vernon S. Pankratz
    James R. Cerhan
    Celine M. Vachon
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2007, 18 : 505 - 515
  • [46] Association of diabetes with mammographic breast density and breast cancer in the Minnesota breast cancer family study
    Sellers, Thomas A.
    Jensen, Leif E.
    Vierkant, Robert A.
    Fredericksen, Zachary S.
    Brandt, Kathleen R.
    Giuliano, Anna R.
    Pankratz, Vernon S.
    Cerhan, James R.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2007, 18 (05) : 505 - 515
  • [47] Microcalcifications, mammographic breast density, and risk of breast cancer: a cohort study
    Soyeoun Kim
    Thi Xuan Mai Tran
    Huiyeon Song
    Boyoung Park
    Breast Cancer Research, 24
  • [48] Relationship between the Metabolic Syndrome and Mammographic Breast Density in Breast Cancer
    Shokuhi, P.
    McGarrigle, S.
    Sullivan, C.
    Boyle, T.
    Alazawi, D.
    O'Keeffe, S.
    Kennedy, J.
    Connolly, E.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 187 : S146 - S147
  • [49] Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: Masking bias or causality?
    Carla H. van Gils
    Johannes D.M. Otten
    André L.M. Verbeek
    Jan H.C.L. Hendriks
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 1998, 14 : 315 - 320
  • [50] MAMMOGRAPHIC BREAST DENSITY AS A BREAST CANCER RISK FACTOR: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTION
    O'Neill, Suzanne
    Sulayman, Nadiyah
    Spellman, Elizabeth
    Leventhal, Kara Grace
    Scarles, Marie
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2013, 45 : S243 - S243