Information Distribution, Utilization, and Decisions by New Product Development Teams

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Haisu [1 ]
Basadur, Timothy M. [2 ]
Schmidt, Jeffrey B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ Calumet, Hammond, IN 46323 USA
[2] Concordia Univ Chicago, River Forest, IL USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Michael F Price Coll Business, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
UNSHARED INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE; PERSPECTIVE; INTEGRATION; ESCALATION; COMMITMENT; EXPERIENCE; PREFERENCE; FAILURE; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/jpim.12200
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Typically, organizations use new product development processes composed of activities followed by decision points, where projects are continued or abandoned. A decision maker likely possesses some common information also held by other decision makers and some unique information (that only she/he possesses). If a team relies mainly on overlapping, or common, information, decisions may suffer, but if they share and utilize information originally possessed by a subset of individual members, better decisions can be made. In this paper, the authors designed and conducted four studies to examine the effects of information distribution and utilization on new product team decision-making. In study 1, the findings show that team members tend to use information possessed by everyone (i.e., common information) but neglect critical information possessed only by one of them (i.e., unique information). This common information bias results in suboptimal new product continuation decisions. In study 2, the interplay between the common information bias and team commitment to the NPD project favored by unique information is examined. The results show that although commitment influences new product development team decisions, the common information bias is stronger. Study 3 was conducted to rule out an alternative explanation for the effect of information distributionthe perception of information importance. In study 4, the focal hypotheses were re-tested using a different sample to add confidence in the findings.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 204
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Designing global new product teams - Optimizing the effects of national culture on new product development
    Sivakumar, K
    Nakata, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MARKETING REVIEW, 2003, 20 (04) : 397 - 445
  • [22] Complex organizational knowledge structures for new product development teams
    Chang, Han-Chao
    Tsai, Ming-Ten
    Tsai, Chung-Lin
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2011, 24 (05) : 652 - 661
  • [23] Antecedents and Consequences of Political Behavior in New Product Development Teams
    Dayan, Mumin
    Elbanna, Said
    Di Benedetto, Anthony
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2012, 59 (03) : 470 - 482
  • [24] The role of trust and project commitment in new product development teams
    Barczak, G
    McDonough, EF
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR RESHAPING THE WORLD, 2003, : 274 - 281
  • [25] New product development as a complex adaptive system of decisions
    McCarthy, Ian P.
    Tsinopoulos, Christos
    Allen, Peter
    Rose-Anderssen, Christen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 23 (05) : 437 - 456
  • [26] Effective virtual new product development teams: an integrated framework
    Badrinarayanan, Vishag
    Arnett, Dennis B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2008, 23 (04) : 242 - 248
  • [27] MAKING NEW-PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT DECISIONS - A MODEL
    KASTNER, G
    LITTLEFIELD, JE
    MAS, EA
    [J]. BUSINESS, 1981, 31 (03): : 20 - 28
  • [28] Understanding Emergent Processes within New Product Development Teams
    Wallace, Steven
    Kshetri, Nir
    [J]. AMCIS 2012 PROCEEDINGS, 2012,
  • [29] An Exploratory Model of Interpersonal Cohesiveness in New Product Development Teams
    Brockman, Beverly K.
    Rawlston, Melissa E.
    Jones, Michael A.
    Halstead, Diane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (02) : 201 - 219
  • [30] Knowledge Management in New Product Development: Leading Innovation Teams
    Tsakalerou, Mariza
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL (ECIC 2016), 2016, : 294 - 299