Hand Hygiene Auditing: Is It a Roadway to Improve Adherence to Hand Hygiene Among Hospital Personnel?

被引:2
|
作者
Ganesan, Vithiya [1 ]
Sundaramurthy, Raja [2 ]
Thiruvanamalai, Rajendran [1 ]
Raghavan, Monica [1 ]
Chavan, Sunil Kumar D. [2 ]
Pusa, Rajeshwari [2 ]
Sakthivadivel, Varatharajan [3 ]
Gaur, Archana [4 ]
Balan, Yuvaraj [5 ]
机构
[1] Velammal Med Coll Hosp & Res Inst, Dept Microbiol, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Microbiol, Hyderabad, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Internal Med, Hyderabad, India
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Physiol, Hyderabad, India
[5] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Biochem, Hyderabad, India
关键词
hh surveillance; hai prevention; hand hygiene audit; behavioral change; hand hygiene compliance; INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS; MULTIMODAL INTERVENTION; INFECTION; WORKERS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.25221
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Over the years, there has been an increase in hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) among patients in India. One of the main reasons is a lack of compliance with infection control guidelines, such as hand hygiene. So the present study was conducted to determine the compliance of hand hygiene among healthcare workers in a private tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Materials and methods The prospective observational study was carried out between April 2017 and March 2020. Nineteen areas were directly observed for hand hygiene (HH) compliance. At each location, HH audit was conducted for one hour per day for five days per month. HH complete adherence rate (HHCAR) and HH partial adherence rate (HHPAR) were analyzed. Results Nine hundred and twenty observation periods were completed during the entire study period. Overall, hand hygiene complete adherence rate was 29.9% (11,981/39,998); partial adherence rate was 45.3% (18,131/39,998) and the non-adherence rate was 24.7% (9886/39,998). A better adherence rate was seen among nurses (44.7%), followed by other staff (33.7%) and doctors (33.04%). Moment-specific adherence rates show almost equal adherence rates of 50.7%, 50.75%, and 50.1%, respectively, for moments 2, 3, and 4, and comparatively low for moments 1 and 5 (48.4% and 47.6%, respectively). Conclusion Despite adequate hand hygiene facilities, compliance remains low. Hand hygiene is a bundle care approach that needs to consider factors including healthcare staff, clinical, institutional, environmental, and behavioral changes. Multimodal interventions and multidisciplinary commitment are mandatory for sustained compliance.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing hand hygiene attitudes of inpatient nursing personnel in a US military hospital
    West, G. F.
    Resendiz, M.
    Lustik, M. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2018, 100 (02) : 214 - 217
  • [42] Hand hygiene adherence among health service workers of Cantabria, Spain
    Dierssen-Sotos, Trinidad
    Robles-Garcia, Monica
    Rodriguez-Cundin, Paz
    Llorca, Javier
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 2010, 134 (02): : 82 - 83
  • [43] Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene
    Pittet, D
    Hugonnet, S
    Harbarth, S
    Mourouga, P
    Sauvan, V
    Touveneau, S
    Perneger, TV
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9238): : 1307 - 1312
  • [44] HAND HYGIENE
    不详
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1965, 2 (5457): : 315 - &
  • [45] HAND HYGIENE
    Palmer, G.
    Plumb, C.
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2010, 209 (01)
  • [46] HAND HYGIENE
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2006, 29 : S27 - S28
  • [47] Hand hygiene
    Delaney, Lisa R.
    Gunderman, Richard B.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 246 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [48] Hand hygiene
    G. Palmer
    C. Plumb
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2010, 209 (1) : 4 - 4
  • [49] Hand hygiene
    Filardo, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (08) : 648 - 648
  • [50] HAND HYGIENE
    MARSH, F
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1965, 2 (5462): : 646 - &