The complexity of decision-making processes and IoT adoption in accommodation SMEs

被引:51
|
作者
Pappas, Nikolaos [1 ]
Caputo, Andrea [2 ,3 ]
Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo [4 ]
Marzi, Giacomo [3 ]
Michopoulou, Eleni [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunderland, Dept Hospitality Events Aviat & Tourism, Sunderland, Durham, England
[2] Univ Trento, Dept Management, Trento, Italy
[3] Univ Lincoln, Dept Management, Lincoln, England
[4] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Management & Law, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Derby, Coll Business Law & Social Sci, Derby, England
关键词
IoT; Smart solutions; Hospitality; Accommodation; Tourism; Decision-making; Fuzzy-set QCA; INTERNET; THINGS; FUZZY; CHAOS; RISK; HOSPITALITY; INTEGRATION; ACCEPTANCE; THINKING; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The current competitive scenario is fast-moving toward an integration of sophisticated technological innovations, i.e. smart solutions for hospitality, in particular the accommodation industry. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies are able to connect and let communicate different devices to craft a personalized customer experience. Given the undeniable impact for the hospitality sector, the decisions about adopting smart solutions are not always linear: benefits and limitations co-exist and need to be weighed against each other. By adopting fsQCA, this paper compares several decision-making factors that may influence the willingness to adopt IoT, surveying owners/managers in the Greek accommodation industry. Results show four types of decision-making: (i) rational, a weighted evaluation of risks and opportunities; (ii) enthusiast, mostly highlighting benefits to gain a competitive advantage; (iii) cautious, emphasizing risks and barriers to innovate; and (iv) futurist, a consideration of future technological necessities related to the increasing digitalization.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 583
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Computational Complexity and Human Decision-Making
    Bossaerts, Peter
    Murawski, Carsten
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (12) : 917 - 929
  • [22] The decision-making process of and the decisive factors in accommodation choice
    Chen, Chiang-Ming
    Tsai, Yi-Chun
    Chiu, Hsien-Hung
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2017, 20 (02) : 111 - 119
  • [23] ADOPTION - A PLEA FOR REALISTIC CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION-MAKING
    PALMER, LI
    [J]. COLUMBIA HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW, 1979, 11 (01) : 1 - 49
  • [24] Confident Privacy Decision-Making in IoT Environments
    Lee, Hosub
    Kobsa, Alfred
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION, 2020, 27 (01)
  • [25] A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes
    Venkatesh, V
    Morris, MG
    Ackerman, PL
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 83 (01) : 33 - 60
  • [26] Neuromanagement decision-making and cognitive algorithmic processes in the technological adoption of mobile commerce apps
    Andronie, Mihai
    Lazaroiu, George
    Stefanescu, Roxana
    Ionescu, Luminita
    Cocosatu, Madaina
    [J]. OECONOMIA COPERNICANA, 2021, 12 (04) : 1033 - 1062
  • [27] Models for research into decision-making processes: On phases, streams and decision-making rounds
    Teisman, GR
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2000, 78 (04) : 937 - 956
  • [28] Ethical decision-making in Australian SMEs: a field study
    Savur, Sunil
    Provis, Chris
    Harris, Howard
    [J]. SMALL ENTERPRISE RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (02): : 114 - 136
  • [29] Environmental decision-making: Exploring complexity and context
    Witt, G. Brad
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 18 (03) : 199 - 200
  • [30] Managing Information Uncertainty and Complexity in Decision-Making
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    Tavana, Madjid
    Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh
    Bausys, Romualdas
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2017,