Sequential bilateral cochlear implant: results in children and adolescents

被引:9
|
作者
Lazarini Almeida, Gabriela Felix [1 ]
Martins, Marcella Ferrari [2 ]
Alves da Costa, Lucas Bevilacqua [2 ]
da Costa, Orozimbo Alves [3 ]
Martinho de Carvalho, Ana Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, FM, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Alfa Inst Comunicacao & Audicao, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, FOB, Bauru, SP, Brazil
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing; Hearing loss; Child; Speech perception; NORMAL-HEARING; TIME; BENEFITS; INTERVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.07.008
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: The use of the bilateral cochlear implants can promote the symmetrical development of the central auditory pathways, thus benefiting the development of auditory abilities and improving sound localization and the ability of auditory speech perception in situations of competitive noise. Objective: To evaluate the ability of speech perception in children and adolescents using sequential bilateral cochlear implants, considering the association of these variables: age at surgery, time of device use and interval between surgeries. Methods: A total of 14 individuals between 10 and 16 years of age, who demonstrated surgical indication for the use of sequential bilateral cochlear implants as intervention in the auditory habilitation process, were assessed. The speech perception ability was assessed through sentence lists constructed in the Portuguese language, presented in two situations: in silence, with fixed intensity of 60 dB SPL, and in competitive noise, with a signal-to-noise ratio of +15 dB. The evaluation was performed under the following conditions: unilateral with the first activated cochlear implant, unilateral with the second activated cochlear implant and bilateral with both devices activated. Results: The results of the speech perception tests showed better performance in both silence and in noise for the bilateral cochlear implant condition when compared to the 1st cochlear implant and the 2nd cochlear implant alone. A worse result of speech perception was found using the 2nd cochlear implant atone. No statistically significant correlation was found between age at the surgical procedure, interval between surgeries and the time of use of the 2nd cochlear implant, and the auditory speech perception performance for all assessed conditions. The use of a hearing aid prior to the 2nd cochlear implant resulted in benefits for auditory speech perception with the 2nd cochlear implant, both in silence and in noise. Conclusion: The bilateral cochlear implant provided better speech perception in silence and in noise situations when compared to the unilateral cochlear implant, regardless of the interval between surgeries, age at the surgical procedure and the time of use of the 2nd cochlear implant. Speech perception with the 1st cochlear implant was significantly better than with the 2nd cochlear implant, both in silence and in noise. The use of the hearing aid prior to the 2nd cochlear implant influenced speech perception performance with the 2nd cochlear implant, both in silence and in noise. (C) 2018 Associacao Brasileira de Otorrinotaringologia e Cirurgia Cervico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:774 / 779
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Auditory Cortical Maturation in Children With Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants
    Sparreboom, Marloes
    Beynon, Andy J.
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [22] First Implant-Induced Changes in Rostral Brainstem Impair Second Implant Outcomes in Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children With Long Inter-Implant Delay
    Kishimoto, Ippei
    Yamazaki, Hiroshi
    Naito, Yasushi
    Moroto, Saburo
    Yamazaki, Tomoko
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2019, 40 (04) : E364 - E372
  • [23] Quality of Life and Cochlear Implant: Results in Saudi Children
    Alnuhayer, Ola
    Alshawi, Yazeed
    Julaidan, Bedoor
    Alromaih, Norah
    Alakeel, Norah
    Alballaa, Abdulaziz
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [24] Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children: Development of the Primary Auditory Abilities of Bilateral Stimulation
    Sparreboom, Marloes
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2011, 16 (04) : 203 - 213
  • [25] Bilateral cochlear implantation in children and the impact of the inter-implant interval
    Lammers, Marc J. W.
    Venekamp, Roderick P.
    Grolman, Wilko
    van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (04): : 993 - 999
  • [26] Speech Perception Benefit for Children with a Cochlear Implant and a Hearing Aid in Opposite Ears and Children with Bilateral Cochlear Implants
    Mok, Mansze
    Galvin, Karyn L.
    Dowell, Richard C.
    McKay, Colette M.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2010, 15 (01) : 44 - 56
  • [27] Selection of the optimal first ear for sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children
    Kim, Hantai
    Ha, Jungho
    Gil, Eun Sol
    Jang, Jeong Hun
    Park, Hun Yi
    Choung, Yun-Hoon
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2024, 103 (07) : NP432 - NP439
  • [28] Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: Parents' Perspective and device use
    Sparreboom, Marloes
    Leeuw, A. Rens
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 76 (03) : 339 - 344
  • [29] Timing of bilateral sequential cochlear implantation for children: determination of its benefit
    Chiung-Wen Hsu
    Pei-Hsuan Ho
    Chia-Huei Chu
    Pey-Yu Chen
    Hsiao-Man Hsu
    Yu-Lin Cheng
    Xiang-Xiang Chen
    I-Hsiu Chen
    Yung-Chen Sun
    Hung-Ching Lin
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2025, 282 (3) : 1247 - 1255
  • [30] The benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children
    Steffens, Thomas
    Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke
    Strutz, Jurgen
    Aschendorff, Antje
    Klenzner, Thomas
    Ruehl, Stephanie
    Voss, Bettina
    Wesarg, Thomas
    Laszig, Roland
    Lenarz, Thomas
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2008, 128 (02) : 164 - 176