How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Hellenbrand, Johannes [1 ]
Mayer, Richard E. [2 ]
Opfermann, Maria [3 ]
Schmeck, Annett [4 ]
Leutner, Detlev [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Instruct Psychol, Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Educ Sci, Bochum, Germany
[4] Stiftung Mercator Essen, Essen, Germany
关键词
eye tracking; generative drawing; generative learning activities; learning processes; multimedia learning; MOVEMENT ANALYSIS; SCIENCE TEXT; CAT DISSECTION; COMPREHENSION; PICTURES; ILLUSTRATIONS; CONSTRUCTION; STRATEGY; REPRESENTATION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1002/acp.3559
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Generative drawing is a learning strategy in which students draw illustrations while reading a text to depict the content of the lesson. In two experiments, students were asked to generate drawings as they read a scientific text or read the same text on influenza with author-provided illustrations (Experiment 1) or to generate drawings or write verbal summaries as they read (Experiment 2). An examination of students' eye movements during learning showed that students who engaged in generative drawing displayed more rereadings of words, higher proportion of fixations on the important words, higher rate of transitions between words and workspace, and higher proportion of transitions between important words and workspace than students given a text lesson with author-generated illustrations (Experiment 1) or students who were asked to write a summary (Experiment 2). These findings contribute new evidence to guide theories for explaining how generative drawing affects learning processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1147 / 1164
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring the Creative Process: Integrating Psychometric and Eye-Tracking Approaches
    Jankowska, Dorota M.
    Czerwonka, Marta
    Lebuda, Izabela
    Karwowski, Maciej
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [42] Integration of eye-tracking and object detection in a deep learning system for quality inspection analysis
    Cho, Seung-Wan
    Lim, Yeong-Hyun
    Seo, Kyung-Min
    Kim, Jungin
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 11 (03) : 158 - 173
  • [43] How People with Low and High Graph Literacy Process Health Graphs: Evidence from Eye-tracking
    Okan, Yasmina
    Galesic, Mirta
    Garcia-Retamero, Rocio
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 29 (2-3) : 271 - 294
  • [44] How do social media users process cancer prevention messages on Facebook? An eye-tracking study
    Chou, Wen-ying Sylvia
    Trivedi, Neha
    Peterson, Emily
    Gaysynsky, Anna
    Krakow, Mindy
    Vraga, Emily
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (06) : 1161 - 1167
  • [45] Split-attention effects in multimedia learning environments: eye-tracking and EEG analysis
    Mutlu-Bayraktar, Duygu
    Ozel, Pinar
    Altindis, Fatih
    Yilmaz, Bulent
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 81 (06) : 8259 - 8282
  • [46] How individuals with BDD process their own faces: a quantitative and qualitative investigation based on an eye-tracking paradigm
    Toh, W. L.
    Castle, D.
    Rossell, S.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2016, 18 : 157 - 158
  • [47] Effects of detailed illustrations on science learning: an eye-tracking study
    Yu Ying Lin
    Kenneth Holmqvist
    Kiyofumi Miyoshi
    Hiroshi Ashida
    Instructional Science, 2017, 45 : 557 - 581
  • [48] Multimodal Continual Learning with Sonographer Eye-Tracking in Fetal Ultrasound
    Patra, Arijit
    Cai, Yifan
    Chatelain, Pierre
    Sharma, Harshita
    Drukker, Lior
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Noble, J. Alison
    SIMPLIFYING MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2021, 12967 : 14 - 24
  • [49] Effects of detailed illustrations on science learning: an eye-tracking study
    Lin, Yu Ying
    Holmqvist, Kenneth
    Miyoshi, Kiyofumi
    Ashida, Hiroshi
    INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2017, 45 (05) : 557 - 581
  • [50] Using machine learning to detect events in eye-tracking data
    Raimondas Zemblys
    Diederick C. Niehorster
    Oleg Komogortsev
    Kenneth Holmqvist
    Behavior Research Methods, 2018, 50 : 160 - 181