Impella support as a bridge to heart surgery in patients with cardiogenic shock

被引:13
|
作者
Saito, Shunsuke [1 ]
Shibasaki, Ikuko [1 ]
Matsuoka, Taiki [1 ]
Niitsuma, Ken [1 ]
Hirota, Shotaro [1 ]
Kanno, Yasuyuki [1 ]
Kanazawa, Yuta [1 ]
Tezuka, Masahiro [1 ]
Takei, Yusuke [1 ]
Tsuchiya, Go [1 ]
Konishi, Taisuke [1 ]
Ogata, Koji [1 ]
Fukuda, Hirotsugu [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Cardiac & Vasc Surg, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
关键词
Impella; Cardiogenic shock; Delayed surgery; Emergency surgery; Bridge to surgery; VENTRICULAR SEPTAL RUPTURE; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; PUMP; IMPLANTATION; MANAGEMENT; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivac088
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: In patients with cardiogenic shock, delayed surgery after stabilization of haemodynamics and improvement in end-organ function by mechanical circulatory support is known to yield better outcomes than emergency surgery. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) as a bridge to cardiac surgery in patients with cardiogenic shock. METHODS: We reviewed 7 patients with cardiogenic shock who underwent Impella support as a bridge to cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass at our institution between April 2018 and August 2021. RESULTS: Cardiogenic shock was caused by ventricular septal rupture in 3 patients, papillary muscle rupture in 1 and acute myocardial infarction in 3. Cardiac surgery was delayed by 1-7 (3.9 +/- 2.5) days with Impella support after the diagnosis of cardiogenic shock, during which the hepatic and renal function of the patients improved significantly. Device-related or operation-related adverse events included re-exploration for bleeding in 3 patients, acute limb ischaemia due to thromboembolism in 1 and intraoperative aortic dissection in 1. Thirty-day mortality was 14.3%, and the cumulative survival was 71.4% at 1 year. The survival tended to be better than that in historical control group in which extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used as a bridge to surgery (P = 0.0992). CONCLUSIONS: Impella is an effective tool for bridging patients with cardiogenic shock to surgery. This strategy may improve surgical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock. However, prolonged Impella support may increase significant adverse events, and further investigation is required to determine the optimal duration of support before surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Initial experiences with the Impella device in patients with cardiogenic shock - Impella support for cardiogenic shock
    Meyns, B
    Dens, J
    Sergeant, P
    Herijgers, P
    Daenen, W
    Flameng, W
    [J]. THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2003, 51 (06): : 312 - 317
  • [2] Unloading a Broken Heart: Impella Support for Takotsubo Syndrome Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
    Tehrani, Behnam N.
    Epps, Kelly C.
    Sherwood, Matthew W.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2022, 40 : 120 - 122
  • [3] First use of the Impella 5.5 in a patient with cardiogenic shock to bridge to heart transplantation in Poland
    Przybylski, Roman
    Blaziak, Mikolaj
    Bochenek, Maciej
    Jarosz, Anna
    Barteczko-Grajek, Barbara
    Zakliczynski, Michal
    Sokolski, Mateusz
    Garus, Mateusz
    Gajewski, Piotr
    Iwanek, Gracjan
    Skalec, Tomasz
    Reczuch, Krzysztof
    Kuliczkowski, Wiktor
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (02) : 355 - 356
  • [4] Comparison of Impella and IABP Cardiac Support Systems in Patients with cardiogenic Shock
    Tanev, I.
    Dernick, G.
    Rauwolf, T.
    Schmeisser, A.
    Braun-Dullaeus, R.
    [J]. MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK-INTENSIVMEDIZIN UND NOTFALLMEDIZIN, 2023, 118 (05)
  • [5] Impact of Impella Support on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock
    Sugimura, Yukiharu
    Immohr, Moritz Benjamin
    Mehdiani, Arash
    Boeken, Udo
    Aubin, Hug
    Lichtenberg, Artur
    Akhyari, Payam
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 30 (01)
  • [6] The Impella Device for Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients in Cardiogenic Shock
    Lemaire, Anthony
    Anderson, Mark B.
    Lee, Leonard Y.
    Scholz, Peter
    Prendergast, Thomas
    Goodman, Andrew
    Lozano, Ann Marie
    Spotnitz, Alan
    Batsides, George
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 97 (01): : 133 - 138
  • [7] Axillary Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support to Bridge Cardiogenic Shock Patients to Heart Transplantation
    Aleman, R. A.
    Napoli, F. A.
    Baran, D. A.
    Velez, M. A.
    Estep, J. A.
    Sheffield, C. A.
    Navia, J. L.
    Brozzi, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 43 (04): : S281 - S281
  • [8] IMPELLA SUPPORT FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK SECONDARY TO ACUTE MYOCARDITIS
    Charalambous, Marinos
    Meraj, Perwaiz
    Jauhar, Rajiv
    Donnelly, Joseph
    Mignatti, Andrea
    Singh, Avneet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 815 - 815
  • [9] Left ventricular support with the Impella® LP 5.0 for cardiogenic shock following cardiac surgery
    Rossiter-Thornton, Michael
    Arun, Viswanath
    Forrest, A. Paul
    Bayfield, Matthew S.
    Wilson, Michael K.
    [J]. HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2008, 17 (03): : 243 - 245
  • [10] Bridge To Decision Or Destination With Impella 5.0 And 5.5 In Cardiogenic Shock
    Agrawal, Nikhil
    Hameed, Fariha R.
    Kumar, Sachin
    Akkanti, Bindu
    Hussain, Rahat
    Jumean, Marwan F.
    Bhardwaj, Anju
    Nathan, Sriram
    Patel, Manish K.
    de Armas, Ismael A. Salas
    Akay, Mehmet H.
    Kar, Biswajit
    Gregoric, Igor D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2022, 28 (05) : S74 - S74