Squat Lifting Imposes Higher Peak Joint and Muscle Loading Compared to Stoop Lifting

被引:13
|
作者
van der Have, Arthur [1 ]
Van Rossom, Sam [1 ]
Jonkers, Ilse [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Kinesiol, Human Movement Biomech Res Grp, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 18期
关键词
lifting technique; stoop; squat; work-related musculoskeletal disorders; musculoskeletal modeling; spine; shoulder; back loading; LOW-BACK-PAIN; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS; RISK-FACTORS; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL; BODY; KINEMATICS; POSITION; FORCES;
D O I
10.3390/app9183794
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
(1) Background: Yearly, more than 40% of the European employees suffer from work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Still, ergonomic guidelines defining optimal lifting techniques to decrease work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) has not been unambiguously defined. Therefore, this study investigates if recommended squat lifting imposes lower musculoskeletal loading than stoop lifting while using a complex full body musculoskeletal OpenSim model. (2) Methods: Ten healthy participants lifted two different weights using both lifting techniques. 3D marker trajectories and ground reaction forces were used as input to calculate joint angles, moments and power using a full body musculoskeletal model with articulated lumbar spine. In addition, the muscle activity of nine different muscles was measured to investigate muscle effort when lifting. (3) Results: Peak moments and peak joint power in L5S1 were not different between the squat and the stoop, but higher peak moments and peak power in the hip, knee, elbow and shoulder were found during squat lifting. Moment impulses in L5S1 were higher during stoop lifting. This is reflected in higher peak electromyography (EMG) but lower muscle effort in prior described muscles during the squat. (4) Conclusions: Squat lifting imposes higher peak full body musculoskeletal loading but similar low back loading compared to stoop lifting, as reflected in peak moments, peak power, and peak EMG.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] MECHANICAL AND ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC COMPARISON BETWEEN THE STOOP AND THE SQUAT LIFTING METHODS
    GIAT, Y
    PIKE, N
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 1992, 23 (02) : 95 - 105
  • [12] Psychophysical and psychological comparison of squat and stoop lifting by young females
    Straker, LM
    Duncan, P
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2000, 46 (01): : 27 - 32
  • [13] PHYSIOLOGICAL AND SUBJECTIVE RESPONSES TO MAXIMAL REPETITIVE LIFTING EMPLOYING STOOP AND SQUAT TECHNIQUE
    HAGEN, KB
    HALLEN, J
    HARMSRINGDAHL, K
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 67 (04): : 291 - 297
  • [14] The Effect of Lifting Speed on Cumulative and Peak Biomechanical Loading for Symmetric Lifting Tasks
    Greenland, Kasey O.
    Merryweather, Andrew S.
    Bloswick, Donald S.
    SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2013, 4 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [15] Postural perturbation and muscular response following sudden release during symmetric squat and stoop lifting
    Chow, DHK
    Cheng, IYW
    Holmes, AD
    Evans, JH
    ERGONOMICS, 2005, 48 (06) : 591 - 607
  • [17] The Stoop-Squat-Index: a simple but powerful measure for quantifying whole-body lifting behavior
    Stefan Schmid
    Archives of Physiotherapy, 12
  • [18] RATINGS OF PERCEIVED THIGH AND BACK EXERTION IN FOREST WORKERS DURING REPETITIVE LIFTING USING SQUAT AND STOOP TECHNIQUES
    HAGEN, KB
    HARMSRINGDAHL, K
    SPINE, 1994, 19 (22) : 2511 - 2517
  • [19] EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL LOADING ON LUMBAR EXTENSION MOMENT DURING SQUAT LIFTING
    Vatidat, Iman
    Rostami, Niostafa
    Ghomsheh, Farhad Tabatabai
    Khorramymehr, Siamak
    Tanbakoosaz, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 30 (04) : 665 - 679
  • [20] Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting
    Kuijer, P. P. F. M.
    van Oostrom, S. H.
    Duijzer, K.
    van Dieen, J. H.
    ERGONOMICS, 2012, 55 (03) : 343 - 349