Opportunity cost in the evaluation of surgical innovations: a case study of laparoscopic versus open colectomy

被引:28
|
作者
Chatterjee, Abhishek [1 ]
Chen, Lilian [2 ]
Goldenberg, Elie A. [3 ]
Bae, Harold T. [4 ]
Finlayson, Samuel R. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[2] Dartmouth Med Sch, Lebanon, NH USA
[3] Concord Hosp, Dartmouth Clin, Dept Surg, Lebanon, NH USA
[4] Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Lebanon, NH USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2010年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
Additional operating time; Laparoscopic colectomy; Open colectomy; Opportunity cost; Surgical innovation; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; GUIDELINES; ADVANTAGES; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-009-0728-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Opportunity cost is the value of an activity forgone for participation in some other activity. With respect to surgery, an innovation incurs an opportunity cost when it uses additional operating time that could otherwise be used in a productive way. This report describes an example of assessing opportunity cost in the transition from open to laparoscopic colectomy using pooled analysis data from the surgical literature and hospital financial data. A MEDLINE literature search was performed between the years 1998 and 2008. Data were pooled from the identified studies used for the statistical analysis of cost and operating room time differences between laparoscopic versus open colectomy. The analysis identified five commonly performed, elective general surgery procedures. The profit margins of these procedures then were determined and divided by their average surgical time to calculate a range of opportunity cost multipliers. Finally, these opportunity cost multipliers were applied to the additional time required for performance of laparoscopic colectomy to demonstrate that procedure's true overall cost. Seven comparative studies were identified. The pooled analysis showed that the operating time was longer for a laparoscopic colectomy by 27.08 min (p < 0.0001). Additionally, laparoscopic colectomies had slightly higher total costs ($104.67 difference), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.28). The five commonly performed, elective procedures chosen were laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, breast biopsy, partial mastectomy, and total thyroidectomy, and their opportunity cost multipliers ranged from $9 to $26 per minute. Depending on the opportunity cost multiplier used, the opportunity cost of an additional 27.08 min required to perform laparoscopic colectomy ranges from $243.72 to $704.08, which is approximately two to six times greater than the point estimate of the difference in total costs based on published studies. Although frequently overlooked, opportunity cost is a potentially very important element in assessing the true costs of surgical innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:1075 / 1079
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colectomy
    Alice C. A. Murray
    Cody Chiuzan
    Ravi P. Kiran
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 5275 - 5282
  • [32] Risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colectomy
    Murray, Alice C. A.
    Chiuzan, Cody
    Kiran, Ravi P.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (12): : 5275 - 5282
  • [33] Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study
    N. Pokala
    C. P. Delaney
    A. J. Senagore
    K. M. Brady
    V. W. Fazio
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2005, 19 : 531 - 535
  • [34] Single-port laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: a comparison of surgical results
    Hiroyuki Egi
    Minoru Hattori
    Takao Hinoi
    Yuji Takakura
    Yasuo Kawaguchi
    Manabu Shimomura
    Masakazu Tokunaga
    Tomohiro Adachi
    Takashi Urushihara
    Toshiyuki Itamoto
    Hideki Ohdan
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 10
  • [35] THE MORBIDITY OF SURGICAL ACCESS - A STUDY OF OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    FARROW, HC
    FLETCHER, DR
    JONES, RM
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 63 (12): : 952 - 954
  • [36] Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy - A case-matched comparative study
    Pokala, N
    Delaney, CP
    Senagore, AJ
    Brady, KM
    Fazio, VW
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (04): : 531 - 535
  • [37] Single-port laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: a comparison of surgical results
    Egi, Hiroyuki
    Hattori, Minoru
    Hinoi, Takao
    Takakura, Yuji
    Kawaguchi, Yasuo
    Shimomura, Manabu
    Tokunaga, Masakazu
    Adachi, Tomohiro
    Urushihara, Takashi
    Itamoto, Toshiyuki
    Ohdan, Hideki
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 10
  • [38] Laparoscopic extended right colectomy versus laparoscopic left colectomy for carcinoma of the splenic flexure: a matched case-control study
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Hain, Elisabeth
    Disabato, Mara
    Cordun, Cristiana
    Carra, Maria Clotilde
    Azoulay, Daniel
    Brunetti, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 31 (03) : 623 - 630
  • [39] Prospective comparison of gastric emptying after laparoscopic-aided colectomy versus open colectomy
    Gelpi, JR
    DorseyTyler, K
    Luchtefeld, MA
    Senagore, AJ
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 1996, 62 (07) : 594 - 596
  • [40] Clinical outcomes of surgical therapy (cost) study group review of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer
    Fleshman, JW
    Nelson, H
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 110 (04) : A1385 - A1385