Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Octo- and Nonagenarians for the Treatment of Early-Stage Lung Cancer

被引:11
|
作者
Giuliani, Meredith [1 ]
Hope, Andrew [1 ]
Guckenberger, Matthias [2 ,3 ]
Mantel, Frederick [3 ]
Peulen, Heike [4 ]
Sonke, Jan-Jakob [4 ]
Belderbos, Jose [4 ]
Werner-Wasik, Maria [5 ]
Ye, Hong [6 ]
Grills, Inga S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Radiat Oncol, Wurzburg, Germany
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[6] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Royal Oak, MI USA
关键词
ELDERLY-PATIENTS; ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; OCTOGENARIANS; COMORBIDITY; OUTCOMES; SBRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the safety and efficacy of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in octo-and nonagenarians and to compare their outcomes with those of younger patients. Methods and Materials: Patients with primary lung cancer treated with SBRT were identified from a multi-institutional (5 institutions) database of 1083 cases. Details of patient factors, treatment specifics, toxicity, and clinical outcomes were extracted from the database. All events were calculated from the end of radiation therapy. Estimates of local recurrence, regional recurrence, and distant metastases were calculated using the competing risk method. Cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Outcomes were compared for those aged <70, 70 to 79, and >= 80 years. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine associations with CSS and OS in patients aged >= 80 years. Results: The median (range) follow-up was 1.7 (1-10) years, and median age was 75 (41-94) years. There were 305 patients aged <70 years (28%), 448 aged 70 to 79 years (41%), and 330 aged >= 80 years (30%). There was no difference in 2-year local recurrence (4.2% vs 5.4% vs 3.7%, respectively, P=.7), regional recurrence (10.4% vs 7.8% vs 5.3%, P=.1), distant metastases (12.2% vs 7.7% vs 9.5%, P=.2), or CSS (90.6% vs 90.3% vs 90.4%, P=.6). Those aged >= 80 years had significantly lower 2-year OS (73.6% vs 67.2% vs 63.3%, P<.01). The grade 3+ pneumonitis rate was 1.3% versus 1.6% versus 1.5% (P=1.0) in patients aged <70, 70 to 79, and >= 80 years, respectively. The 90-day mortality rates for patients aged <70, 70 to 79, and >= 80 years were 1.3%, 2.5%, and 2.4% (P=.01), respectively. In patients aged >= 80 years OS was associated with T category (hazard ratio 1.7; P<.01). Conclusion: Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a safe treatment modality in elderly patients (aged >= 80 years). Despite larger tumor volumes, the tumor control outcomes were comparable to those in younger patients treated with SBRT. All patients with early-stage lung cancer, regardless of age, should be considered for treatment with SBRT. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 899
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Dahele, M.
    Pearson, S.
    Franks, K.
    Purdie, T.
    Bissonnette, J.
    Brade, A. M.
    Cho, J.
    Sun, A.
    Jaffray, D.
    Bezjak, A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)
  • [32] Factors associated with cavity formation after stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral early-stage lung cancer
    Maebayashi, Toshiya
    Ishibashi, Naoya
    Sakaguchi, Masakuni
    Aizawa, Takuya
    Sato, Akahiko
    Saito, Tsutomu
    Kawamori, Jiro
    Tanaka, Yoshiaki
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, 129 (03): : 507 - 514
  • [33] Can metabolic activity predict response in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy?
    Horne, Zachary D.
    Clump, David A.
    Heron, Dwight E.
    LUNG CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2013, 2 (03) : 165 - 167
  • [34] Surgery Versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Who's Down for the Count?
    Timmerman, Robert D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (06) : 907 - 909
  • [35] Exploring the Impact of Time-to-Treatment in Early-Stage Medically Inoperable Lung Cancer Patients Referred for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
    Videtic, G. M.
    Woody, N. M.
    Stephans, K. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E434 - E434
  • [36] Regional Failure After Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer
    Say, C.
    Diehn, M.
    Loo, B. W., Jr.
    Shultz, D. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E437 - E437
  • [37] Association between tumor cell in air space and treatment outcomes in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Makita, Kenji
    Hamamoto, Yasushi
    Kanzaki, Hiromitsu
    Nagasaki, Kei
    Matsuki, Hirokazu
    Inoue, Koji
    Kozuki, Toshiyuki
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 47
  • [38] Prognosis and Risk Factors of Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia in Early-Stage Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
    Zhao, Qianqian
    Li, Tingting
    Chen, Gang
    Zeng, Zhaochong
    He, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9
  • [39] A Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy vs. No Treatment for Patients with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Jeppesen, Stefan S.
    Schytte, Tine
    Brink, Carsten
    Hansen, Niels Christian G.
    Hansen, Olfred
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (09) : S442 - S442
  • [40] Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Diagnosed Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Early Analysis of Toxicity
    Harkenrider, M. M.
    Darwish, N. H.
    Adams, W.
    Gliniewicz, A. D.
    Alite, F., Jr.
    Albain, K. S.
    Borowicz, S.
    Czerlanis, C.
    Goyal, A.
    Lubawski, J.
    Wagner, C. R.
    Rosi, D.
    Thomas, T. O., Jr.
    Vigneswaran, W.
    Welsh, J. S.
    Small, W., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E102 - E102