Elucidation of functional groups on gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial surfaces using infrared spectroscopy

被引:429
|
作者
Jiang, W [1 ]
Saxena, A
Song, B
Ward, BB
Beveridge, TJ
Myneni, SCB
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Geosci, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Microbiol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Div Earth Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/la049043+
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Surface functional group chemistry of intact Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial cells and their isolated cell walls was examined as a function of pH, growth phase, and growth media (for intact cells only) using. attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. Infrared spectra of aqueous model organic molecules, representatives of the common functional groups found in bacterial cell walls (i.e., hydroxyl, carboxyl, phosphoryl, and amide groups), were also examined in order to assist the interpretation of the infrared spectra of bacterial samples. The surface sensitivity of the ATR-FTIR spectroscopic technique was evaluated using diatom cells, which possess a several-nanometers-thick layer of glycoprotein on their silica shells. The ATR-FTIR spectra of bacterial surfaces exhibit carboxyl, amide, phosphate, and carbohydrate related features, and these are identical for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative cells. These results provide direct evidence to the previously held conviction that the negative charge of bacterial surfaces is derived from the deprotonation of both carboxylates and phosphates. Variation in solution pH has only a minor effect on the secondary structure of the cell wall proteins. The cell surface functional group chemistry is altered neither by the growth phase nor by the growth medium of bacteria. This study reveals the universality of the functional group chemistry of bacterial cell surfaces.
引用
收藏
页码:11433 / 11442
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ORGANISATION OF POLYMERS IN GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    ROGERS, HJ
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1969, 57 : R4 - &
  • [22] ELECTROCHEMICAL CLASSIFICATION OF GRAM-NEGATIVE AND GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA
    MATSUNAGA, T
    NAKAJIMA, T
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1985, 50 (02) : 238 - 242
  • [23] THE SENSITIVITY OF GRAM-NEGATIVE AND GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA TO OFLOXACIN
    SPECIALE, A
    STEFANI, S
    CACCAMO, F
    NICOLOSI, VM
    NICOLETTI, G
    CHEMIOTERAPIA, 1987, 6 (01): : 17 - 22
  • [24] PROCALCITONIN AS AN INDICATOR OF GRAM-NEGATIVE OR GRAM-POSITIVE PNEUMONIA
    Harlas, Zoanne
    Meyer, Sara Anne
    Scott, Taja
    Smith, Susan
    Carr, John
    Jones, Bruce
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [25] Biofilm patterns in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria
    Ruhal, Rohit
    Kataria, Rashmi
    MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 251
  • [26] Functional analysis of alkane hydroxylases from gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria
    Smits, THM
    Balada, SB
    Witholt, B
    van Beilen, JB
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2002, 184 (06) : 1733 - 1742
  • [27] Antimicrobial effects of positively charged surfaces on adhering Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
    Gottenbos, B
    Grijpma, DW
    van der Mei, HC
    Feijen, J
    Busscher, HJ
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 48 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [28] Photoacoustic based evaluation of viscoelastic properties of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial colonies
    Zahra Hosseindokht
    Mohammadreza Kolahdouz
    Bahareh Hajikhani
    Pezhman Sasanpour
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [29] Mass and Density Measurements of Live and Dead Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacterial Populations
    Lewis, Christina L.
    Craig, Caelli C.
    Senecal, Andre G.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 80 (12) : 3622 - 3631
  • [30] GRAM-NEGATIVE VERSUS GRAM-POSITIVE (ACTINOMYCETE) NONOBLIGATE BACTERIAL PREDATORS OF BACTERIA IN SOIL
    ZEPH, LR
    CASIDA, LE
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 52 (04) : 819 - 823