Treatment options for microcystin toxins: Similarities and differences between variants

被引:54
|
作者
Newcombe, G
Cook, D
Brooke, S
Ho, L
Slyman, N
机构
[1] CRC Water Qual & Treatment, Salisbury, SA 5108, Australia
[2] Univ S Australia, Sch Pharm Mol & Biomed Sci, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
关键词
water treatment; microcystins; activated carbon; algal toxins;
D O I
10.1080/09593330309385562
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over sixty variants of the blue-green algal toxin microcystin have been identified. The two microcystin variants LR and LA vary in only one amino group ie. arginine for microcystin LR and alanine for microcystin LA. In the literature to date, the general consensus has been that m-LR and m-LA should respond similarly to a range of water treatment processes. This is the case for ozonation and biodegradation by organisms colonising granular activated carbon filters; there is negligible difference in the response to these processes between the two variants. However, the adsorption of m-LR onto activated carbon is significantly higher than that of m-LA. This result is surprising as m-LA has a lower molecular weight, and is more hydrophobic, factors that would be expected to favour the adsorption of this compound over m-LR. This trend is also seen for the variants RR and YR. The effect is seen on both negatively and positively charged carbons, indicating that the difference between the variants is not caused by electrostatic interactions with the carbon surface. Electrostatic shielding experiments suggest that electrostatic repulsion between the adsorbed m-LA molecules, with a net charge of -2, may be responsible for the low adsorption. The other variants tested have a lower net charge and therefore experience lower intermolecular repulsion in the adsorbed state.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 308
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Similarities and differences between nuclei and metal clusters
    Walther, C
    Kratz, JV
    Lützenkirchen, K
    Schweikhard, L
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLUSTERING ASPECTS OF NUCLEAR STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS, 2000, : 402 - 404
  • [32] SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A BIOFILTER AND A STANDARD FILTER
    HEUKELEKIAN, H
    [J]. SEWAGE WORKS JOURNAL, 1948, 20 (06): : 1032 - 1040
  • [33] On the Similarities and Differences Between the Cloud, Fog and the Edge
    Stanovnik, Saso
    Cankar, Matija
    [J]. EURO-PAR 2019: PARALLEL PROCESSING WORKSHOPS, 2020, 11997 : 112 - 123
  • [34] A perspective on the similarities and differences between China and Italy
    刘书航
    [J]. 校园英语, 2015, (15) : 253 - 253
  • [35] Investigating Differences and Similarities between Betaxolol Polymorphs
    Rossi, Patrizia
    Paoli, Paola
    Milazzo, Stella
    Chelazzi, Laura
    Ienco, Andrea
    Conti, Luca
    [J]. CRYSTALS, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [36] SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PROTON AND ELECTRON TRANSFERS
    MARCUS, RA
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1979, (SEP): : 55 - 55
  • [38] Similarities and differences between mast cells and basophil
    Arock, M
    [J]. REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE ET D IMMUNOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 2004, 44 (01): : 23 - 36
  • [39] Similarities and differences between Bose and Fermi gases
    Pathria, RK
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1998, 57 (03) : 2697 - 2702
  • [40] SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL PARADIGMS
    CLARK, N
    [J]. FUTURES, 1987, 19 (01) : 26 - 42