Treatment options for microcystin toxins: Similarities and differences between variants

被引:54
|
作者
Newcombe, G
Cook, D
Brooke, S
Ho, L
Slyman, N
机构
[1] CRC Water Qual & Treatment, Salisbury, SA 5108, Australia
[2] Univ S Australia, Sch Pharm Mol & Biomed Sci, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
关键词
water treatment; microcystins; activated carbon; algal toxins;
D O I
10.1080/09593330309385562
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over sixty variants of the blue-green algal toxin microcystin have been identified. The two microcystin variants LR and LA vary in only one amino group ie. arginine for microcystin LR and alanine for microcystin LA. In the literature to date, the general consensus has been that m-LR and m-LA should respond similarly to a range of water treatment processes. This is the case for ozonation and biodegradation by organisms colonising granular activated carbon filters; there is negligible difference in the response to these processes between the two variants. However, the adsorption of m-LR onto activated carbon is significantly higher than that of m-LA. This result is surprising as m-LA has a lower molecular weight, and is more hydrophobic, factors that would be expected to favour the adsorption of this compound over m-LR. This trend is also seen for the variants RR and YR. The effect is seen on both negatively and positively charged carbons, indicating that the difference between the variants is not caused by electrostatic interactions with the carbon surface. Electrostatic shielding experiments suggest that electrostatic repulsion between the adsorbed m-LA molecules, with a net charge of -2, may be responsible for the low adsorption. The other variants tested have a lower net charge and therefore experience lower intermolecular repulsion in the adsorbed state.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 308
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Similarities and differences between the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) splice variants
    Neufeld, G
    Cohen, T
    GitayGoren, H
    Poltorak, Z
    Tessler, S
    Sharon, R
    Gengrinovitch, S
    Levi, BZ
    [J]. CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 1996, 15 (02) : 153 - 158
  • [2] Two variants of Msplit estimation - similarities and differences
    Wyszkowska, Patrycja
    Duchnowski, Robert
    [J]. ADVANCES IN GEODESY AND GEOINFORMATION, 2022, 71 (01)
  • [3] Molecular Similarities and Differences between Canine Prostate Cancer and Human Prostate Cancer Variants
    Vasilatis, Demitria M.
    Lucchesi, Christopher A.
    Ghosh, Paramita M.
    [J]. BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (04)
  • [4] Similarities Between Depression and Neurodegenerative Diseases: Pathophysiology, Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment Options
    Hussain, Madiha
    Kumar, Prabhat
    Khan, Sara
    Gordon, Domonick K.
    Khan, Safeera
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [5] Similarities and differences between traditions
    Reicher, S
    Taylor, S
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 18 (09) : 547 - 549
  • [6] Human Ecology and Sustainability Science Differences and Similarities, Synergy Options
    Tretter, Felix
    Simon, Karl-Heinz
    Glaeser, Bernhard
    [J]. GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2019, 28 (02): : 174 - 176
  • [7] Similarities and differences between soaps and complements
    von Koranyi, A
    [J]. BIOCHEMISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 1908, 11 : 82 - 88
  • [8] Similarities and differences between design and artwork
    Despot, Katerina
    Sandeva, Vaska
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL LEARNING, ICVL 2017, 2017, : 198 - 203
  • [9] Bullying and cyberbullying: between similarities and differences
    D'Angio, G.
    [J]. CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2020, 171 (03): : 207 - 209
  • [10] Differences and Similarities between Whitman and Dickinson
    王芃淇
    [J]. 海外英语, 2018, (09) : 179 - 180