A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling

被引:73
|
作者
Huang, Po-Hsien [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Hung [1 ]
Weng, Li-Jen [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
structural equation modeling; penalized likelihood; ECM algorithm; oracle property; model selection; factor analysis model; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELS; MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; VARIABLE SELECTION; CROSS-VALIDATION; SPARSE; REGRESSION; IDENTIFIABILITY; ESTIMATORS; SHRINKAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s11336-017-9566-9
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
A penalized likelihood (PL) method for structural equation modeling (SEM) was proposed as a methodology for exploring the underlying relations among both observed and latent variables. Compared to the usual likelihood method, PL includes a penalty term to control the complexity of the hypothesized model. When the penalty level is appropriately chosen, the PL can yield an SEM model that balances the model goodness-of-fit and model complexity. In addition, the PL results in a sparse estimate that enhances the interpretability of the final model. The proposed method is especially useful when limited substantive knowledge is available for model specifications. The PL method can be also understood as a methodology that links the traditional SEM to the exploratory SEM (Asparouhov & Muth,n in Struct Equ Model Multidiscipl J 16:397-438, 2009). An expectation-conditional maximization algorithm was developed to maximize the PL criterion. The asymptotic properties of the proposed PL were also derived. The performance of PL was evaluated through a numerical experiment, and two real data illustrations were presented to demonstrate its utility in psychological research.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 354
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adapting Fit Indices for Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling: Comparison to Maximum Likelihood
    Garnier-Villarreal, Mauricio
    Jorgensen, Terrence D.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2020, 25 (01) : 46 - 70
  • [22] Comparing maximum likelihood and PLS estimates for structural equation modeling with formative blocks
    Pasquale Dolce
    Natale Carlo Lauro
    Quality & Quantity, 2015, 49 : 891 - 902
  • [23] Empirical Correction to the Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables
    Yuan, Ke-Hai
    Tian, Yubin
    Yanagihara, Hirokazu
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2015, 80 (02) : 379 - 405
  • [24] Comparing maximum likelihood and PLS estimates for structural equation modeling with formative blocks
    Dolce, Pasquale
    Lauro, Natale Carlo
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2015, 49 (03) : 891 - 902
  • [25] Empirical Correction to the Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables
    Ke-Hai Yuan
    Yubin Tian
    Hirokazu Yanagihara
    Psychometrika, 2015, 80 : 379 - 405
  • [26] Penalized pseudo-likelihood hazard estimation: A fast alternative to penalized likelihood
    Du, Pang
    Gu, Chong
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2009, 139 (03) : 891 - 899
  • [27] Maximum Likelihood, Profile Likelihood, and Penalized Likelihood: A Primer
    Cole, Stephen R.
    Chu, Haitao
    Greenland, Sander
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 179 (02) : 252 - 260
  • [28] A penalized maximum likelihood method for estimating epistatic effects of QTL
    Y-M Zhang
    S Xu
    Heredity, 2005, 95 : 96 - 104
  • [29] A new fuzzy penalized likelihood method for PET image reconstruction
    Zhou, J
    Shu, HZ
    Luo, LM
    Zhu, HQ
    COMPUTATIONAL AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3314 : 550 - 555
  • [30] Robust penalized empirical likelihood estimation method for linear regression
    Arslan, Olcay
    Ozdemir, Senay
    STATISTICS, 2023, 57 (02) : 423 - 443