ELAM: a Model for Acceptance and use of e-Learning by Teachers and Students

被引:0
|
作者
Umrani-Khan, Farida [1 ]
Iyer, Sridhar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
关键词
e-Learning acceptance; performance expectancy; social influence; facilitating conditions; learning style; teaching style; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Use of technology to facilitate learning is accepted to be of value across educational institutions. Government of India has taken cognizance of the institutional support required for resources in e-learning and formulated the national mission on education through ICT. However, the focus is still largely on getting the infrastructure and creating the e-learning content. It is necessary to consider the individual factors that play an important role in the adoption of e-learning. For example, attitude of students and teachers towards e-learning may affect their acceptance of the technology in the teaching-learning process. While there have been studies to understand the factors of the instructors (e.g release time for staff to engage in e-learning) and students (e.g. learning style) in acceptance of e-learning separately, a comprehensive view that considers both students and teachers in the same model is lacking (Jung, et. al., 2008; Nanayakkara 2007). To addresses this research gap, this paper considers the attitudes of students and the teachers that determine intention and actual use of the e-learning technology simultaneously in the model of e-learning. We present a conceptual framework for understanding acceptance of e-learning technology. Our model, ELAM, is based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Venkatesh, et. al. 2003). ELAM (e-learning acceptance model) identifies the key factors in acceptance of e-learning as measured by behavioural intention to use the technology and actual usage. The four determinants of e-learning acceptance are --- (i) performance expectancy, (ii) effort expectancy, (iii) social influence and (iv) facilitating conditions. Performance expectancy is based on beliefs about perceived usefulness, interactivity and flexibility. Effort expectancy is based on beliefs about ease of learning, perceived ease of use and self-efficacy. Social influence is based on subjective norm and image. In developing countries, wherein educational institutions depend on governmental support to get the infrastructure and determine policies, institutional support plays a crucial role in the acceptance of e-learning. Hence, the model includes facilitating conditions as one of the determinants of e-learning acceptance. The following factors are included in this variable --- reliable infrastructure, institutional policies, training and support. As e-learning is associated with individualization of the teaching-learning process, the learning style of the student and teaching style of the teacher is an important factor affecting the adoption process. These factors are considered as mediators affecting the relation between performance expectancy beliefs and behavioural intention to use e-learning. The main contribution of the paper is that it presents a framework to understand e-learning acceptance as governed by the teacher, student and institutional factors.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 485
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors influencing acceptance of e-learning by teachers in the Czech Republic
    Hrtonova, Nina
    Kohout, Jiri
    Rohlikova, Lucie
    Zounek, Jiri
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 51 : 873 - 879
  • [22] Conceptual Model of Collaborative E-learning Acceptance
    Salim, Sharifah Masitah Binti Syed
    Bakri, Aryati Binti
    [J]. 2017 IEEE CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING, E-MANAGEMENT AND E-SERVICES (IC3E), 2017, : 36 - 43
  • [23] Application of Technology Acceptance Model in e-Learning
    Zhang, Li-hui
    Li, Zhi-yong
    Lu, Zhi-fang
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER ENGINEERING & ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT (PEEE 2016), 2016, : 455 - 459
  • [24] HOW TEACHERS AND STUDENTS THINK ABOUT THE USE OF E-LEARNING IN MEDICAL EDUCATION?
    Khoshrang, Hossein
    Dadgaran, Ideh
    Shaigan, Hoorieh
    [J]. ICERI2014: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2014, : 657 - 663
  • [25] The acceptance of e-learning systems and the learning outcome of students at universities in Vietnam
    Quoc Trung Pham
    Thanh Phong Tran
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & E-LEARNING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2020, 12 (01) : 63 - 84
  • [26] E-LEARNING TEACHERS AND STUDENTS ATTITUDES - OPPORTUNITIES AND OBSTACLES
    Strugar, I.
    Zoroja, J.
    Bedenik, N. Osmanagic
    [J]. ICERI2016: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2016, : 8075 - 8083
  • [27] An investigation of employees' use of e-learning systems: applying the technology acceptance model
    Lee, Yi-Hsuan
    Hsieh, Yi-Chuan
    Chen, Yen-Hsun
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 32 (02) : 173 - 189
  • [28] Extending the Technology Acceptance Model for Use of e-Learning Systems by Digital Learners
    Hanif, Aamer
    Jamal, Faheem Qaisar
    Imran, Muhammad
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 73395 - 73404
  • [29] A proposed model of e-learning tools acceptance among university students in developing countries
    Valencia-Arias, Alejandro
    Chalela-Naffah, Salim
    Bermudez-Hernandez, Jonathan
    [J]. EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 24 (02) : 1057 - 1071
  • [30] Individual Differences and E-Learning Acceptance among Saudi Students
    Khadam, Nyla
    Farooq, Ali
    Alwadei, Sahar
    [J]. 2018 21ST SAUDI COMPUTER SOCIETY NATIONAL COMPUTER CONFERENCE (NCC), 2018,