ELAM: a Model for Acceptance and use of e-Learning by Teachers and Students

被引:0
|
作者
Umrani-Khan, Farida [1 ]
Iyer, Sridhar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
关键词
e-Learning acceptance; performance expectancy; social influence; facilitating conditions; learning style; teaching style; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Use of technology to facilitate learning is accepted to be of value across educational institutions. Government of India has taken cognizance of the institutional support required for resources in e-learning and formulated the national mission on education through ICT. However, the focus is still largely on getting the infrastructure and creating the e-learning content. It is necessary to consider the individual factors that play an important role in the adoption of e-learning. For example, attitude of students and teachers towards e-learning may affect their acceptance of the technology in the teaching-learning process. While there have been studies to understand the factors of the instructors (e.g release time for staff to engage in e-learning) and students (e.g. learning style) in acceptance of e-learning separately, a comprehensive view that considers both students and teachers in the same model is lacking (Jung, et. al., 2008; Nanayakkara 2007). To addresses this research gap, this paper considers the attitudes of students and the teachers that determine intention and actual use of the e-learning technology simultaneously in the model of e-learning. We present a conceptual framework for understanding acceptance of e-learning technology. Our model, ELAM, is based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Venkatesh, et. al. 2003). ELAM (e-learning acceptance model) identifies the key factors in acceptance of e-learning as measured by behavioural intention to use the technology and actual usage. The four determinants of e-learning acceptance are --- (i) performance expectancy, (ii) effort expectancy, (iii) social influence and (iv) facilitating conditions. Performance expectancy is based on beliefs about perceived usefulness, interactivity and flexibility. Effort expectancy is based on beliefs about ease of learning, perceived ease of use and self-efficacy. Social influence is based on subjective norm and image. In developing countries, wherein educational institutions depend on governmental support to get the infrastructure and determine policies, institutional support plays a crucial role in the acceptance of e-learning. Hence, the model includes facilitating conditions as one of the determinants of e-learning acceptance. The following factors are included in this variable --- reliable infrastructure, institutional policies, training and support. As e-learning is associated with individualization of the teaching-learning process, the learning style of the student and teaching style of the teacher is an important factor affecting the adoption process. These factors are considered as mediators affecting the relation between performance expectancy beliefs and behavioural intention to use e-learning. The main contribution of the paper is that it presents a framework to understand e-learning acceptance as governed by the teacher, student and institutional factors.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 485
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and validation of the E-learning Acceptance Measure (ElAM)
    Teo, Timothy
    [J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (03): : 148 - 152
  • [2] Acceptance and Use of E-learning Technologies by Saudi Secondary Teachers
    Zalah, Ibrahim
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING (ECEL 2016), 2016, : 758 - 764
  • [3] Using the e-Learning Acceptance Model (ELAM) to Identify Good Practice in the Provision of Online Tutorials
    Lambie, Iain
    Law, Bobby
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING (ECEL 2016), 2016, : 399 - 406
  • [4] Examining the students' behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-learning approach
    Chang, Ching-Ter
    Hajiyev, Jeyhun
    Su, Chia-Rong
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2017, 111 : 128 - 143
  • [5] THE ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF THE E-LEARNING SYSTEMS AMONG THE UNIVERSITY TEACHERS IN ECUADOR
    Ramirez-Anormaliza, R.
    Sabate, F.
    Llinas-Audet, X.
    [J]. EDULEARN16: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, : 3666 - 3674
  • [6] Postgraduate Students' Perceived E-Learning Acceptance: Model Validation
    Yatigammana, M. R. K. N.
    Johar, Md. Gapar Md.
    Gunawardhana, Chandra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2013, 4 (03) : 51 - 60
  • [7] Acceptance of university students in the use of Moodle e-learning systems from the perspective of the TAM model
    Fernando, Teran-Guerrero
    [J]. CIENCIA UNEMI, 2019, 12 (29): : 63 - 76
  • [8] An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning
    Park, Sung Youl
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2009, 12 (03): : 150 - 162
  • [9] Students' Acceptance of E-Learning Technologies: Combining the Technology Acceptance Model with the Didactic Circle
    Ernst, Claus-Peter H.
    Wedel, Kerstin
    Rothlauf, Franz
    [J]. AMCIS 2014 PROCEEDINGS, 2014,
  • [10] Exploring Students' Acceptance of E-Learning Through the Development of a Comprehensive Technology Acceptance Model
    Salloum, Said A.
    Alhamad, Ahmad Qasim Mohammad
    Al-Emran, Mostafa
    Monem, Azza Abdel
    Shaalan, Khaled
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 128445 - 128462