Rehabilitation for patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Taito, Shunsuke [1 ]
Taito, Mahoko [2 ]
Banno, Masahiro [3 ,4 ]
Tsujimoto, Hiraku [5 ]
Kataoka, Yuki [5 ,6 ]
Tsujimoto, Yasushi [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Practice & Support, Div Rehabil, Hiroshima, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, Hiroshima, Japan
[3] Seichiryo Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[4] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[5] Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki Gen Med Ctr, Hosp Care Res Unit, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
[6] Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki Gen Med Ctr, Dept Resp Med, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
[7] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Healthcare Epidemiol, Sch Publ Hlth, Kyoto, Japan
[8] Kyoritsu Hosp, Dept Nephrol & Dialysis, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; ACUTE RESPIRATORY-FAILURE; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; PHYSICAL REHABILITATION; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; SURVIVORS; MOBILIZATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0201292
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The objective of this systematic review was to determine whether rehabilitation impacts clinically relevant outcomes among adult patients with sepsis. Randomized controlled trials from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PEDro, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal, as well as conference proceedings and reference lists of relevant articles were collected. Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials on the rehabilitation of patients with sepsis, and the two reviewers independently abstracted trial level data including population characteristics, interventions, comparisons, and clinical outcomes. Our primary outcomes were quality of life (QOL), activity of daily living (ADL), and mortality. Our secondary outcomes were length of stay, return to work, muscle strength, delirium, and all adverse events. The quality of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We included two trials enrolling 75 patients. The mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) of physical function and physical role in QOL measured by SF-36 were 21.10 (95% CI: 6.57 +/- 35.63) and 44.40 (95% CI: 22.55 +/- 66.05), respectively. Rehabilitation did not significantly decrease intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (risk ratio, 2.02 [95% CI: 0.46 +/- 8.91], I-2 = 0%; n = 75). ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay and muscle strength were not statistically significantly different and no adverse events were reported in both studies. The certainty of the evidence for these outcomes was "very low." Data on ADL, return to work, and delirium were not available in any of the trials. Rehabilitation of patients with sepsis might not decrease ICU mortality, but might improve QOL. Further, well-designed trials measuring important outcomes will be needed to determine the benefit and harm of rehabilitation among patients with sepsis.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and safety of levosimendan in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Tan, Ruimin
    Guo, He
    Yang, Zinan
    Yang, Huihui
    Li, Qinghao
    Zhu, Qiong
    Du, Quansheng
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [22] Impact of heart failure on outcomes in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ming-Yu Zhu
    Xiao-Kai Tang
    Yi Gao
    Jing-Jing Xu
    Yuan-Qi Gong
    [J]. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2023, (15) : 3511 - 3521
  • [23] Clinical Significance of MicroRNAs in Patients with Sepsis: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hasegawa, Daisuke
    Yamakawa, Kazuma
    Taniguchi, Kohei
    Murao, Shuhei
    Nishida, Osamu
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2019, 9 (04)
  • [24] ENDOTHELIAL GLYCOCALYX DAMAGE BIOMARKERS IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Sarmiento, J. Fernandez
    Molina, C.
    Pelaez, L. Salazar
    Florez, S.
    Sarmiento, R. Hernandez
    Mantilla, M. Sarta
    Forero, L. Alarcon
    Salazar, M.
    Centeno, J. Villar
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (11)
  • [25] Cardiac troponin as a prognosticator of mortality in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Peiqiu
    Wang, Xing
    Guo, Tao
    Gao, Wei
    Huang, Qiang
    Yang, Jie
    Gao, Hui
    Liu, Qian
    [J]. IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION AND DISEASE, 2023, 11 (09)
  • [26] Impact of heart failure on outcomes in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Ming-Yu
    Tang, Xiao-Kai
    Gao, Yi
    Xu, Jing-Jing
    Gong, Yuan-Qi
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2023, 11 (15) : 3511 - 3521
  • [27] Prognostic Value of Procalcitonin in Adult Patients with Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Dan
    Su, Longxiang
    Han, Gencheng
    Yan, Peng
    Xie, Lixin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [28] Impact of Muscle Mass on Survival in Patients with Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Jiajie
    Huang, Yicheng
    Chen, Yingsha
    Shen, Xiaomin
    Pan, Hongying
    Yu, Wei
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2021, 77 (06) : 330 - 336
  • [29] Cardiac rehabilitation and frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    MacEachern, Evan
    Quach, Jack
    Giacomantonio, Nicholas
    Theou, Olga
    Hillier, Troy
    Abel-Adegbite, Ifedayo
    Gonzalez-Lara, Mariana
    Kehler, Dustin Scott
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [30] Pulmonary rehabilitation in sarcoidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Caballeria Lamelas, Estrella
    Alsina Restoy, Xavier
    Torres Castro, Rodrigo
    Gimeno Santos, Elena
    Solis Navarro, Lilian
    Francesqui, Joel
    Hernandez Gonzalez, Fernanda
    Ramos Casals, Manel
    Blanco, Isabel
    Sellares, Jacobo
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62