High-resolution transrectal ultrasound: Pilot study of a novel technique for imaging clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:32
|
作者
Pavlovich, Christian P. [1 ]
Cornish, Toby C. [2 ]
Mullins, Jeffrey K. [1 ]
Fradin, Joel [3 ]
Mettee, Lynda Z. [1 ]
Connor, Jason T. [4 ,5 ]
Reese, Adam C. [1 ]
Askin, Frederic B. [2 ]
Luck, Rachael [2 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [1 ,2 ]
Burke, Harry B. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Berry Consultants, Orlando, FL USA
[5] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Med, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[6] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Biomed Informat Dept, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[7] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Med, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
Diagnosis; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Ultrasound; Sensitivity and specificity; TRANS-RECTAL SONOGRAPHY; COLOR DOPPLER; CONTRAST AGENT; POWER DOPPLER; BIOPSY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; APPEARANCE; CARCINOMA; COHORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.01.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine how high-resolution transrectal ultrasound (HiTRUS) compares with conventional TRUS (LoTRUS) for the visualization of prostate cancer. Methods and materials: Twenty-five men with known prostate cancer scheduled for radical prostatectomy were preoperatively imaged with both LoTRUS (5 MHz) and HiTRUS (21 MHz). Dynamic cine loops and still images for each modality were saved and subjected to blinded review by a radiologist looking for hypoechoic foci >= 5 mm in each sextant of the prostate. :Following prostatectomy, areas of prostate cancer >= 5 mm on pathologic review were anatomically correlated to LoTRUS and HiTRUS findings. The accuracy of LoTRUS and HiTRUS to visualize prostate cancer in each sextant of the prostate and to identify high-grade and locally advanced disease was assessed. The McNemar test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity and paired dichotomous outcomes between imaging modalities. Results: Among 69 sextants with pathologically identified cancerous foci at radical prostatecomy. HiTRUS visualized 45 and missed 24, whereas LoTRUS visualized 26 and missed 43. Compared with LoTRUS, HiTRUS demonstrated improved sensitivity (65.2% vs. 37.7%) and specificity (71.6% vs. 65.4%). HiTRUS's agreement with pathologic findings was twice as high as LoTRUS (P = 0.006). HiTRUS provided a nonsignificant increase in visualization of high-grade lesions (84% vs. 60%, P = 0.11). Conclusions: HiTRUS appears promising for prostate cancer imaging. Our initial experience suggests superiority to LoTRUS for the visualization of cancerous foci, and supports proceeding with a clinical trial in the biopsy setting. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34.e27 / 34.e32
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Can transrectal prostate ultrasound compete with multiparametric MRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Grey, Alistair D. R.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Tam, Joseph
    Loch, Tillmann
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 1492 - 1500
  • [42] Morbidity associated with repeated transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Andreas Blana
    Sebastian Rogenhofer
    Roman Ganzer
    Peter J. Wild
    Wolf F. Wieland
    Bernhard Walter
    World Journal of Urology, 2006, 24 : 585 - 590
  • [43] Morbidity associated with repeated transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Blana, Andreas
    Rogenhofer, Sebastian
    Ganzer, Roman
    Wild, Peter J.
    Wieland, Wolf F.
    Walter, Bernhard
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 24 (05) : 585 - 590
  • [44] Staging of prostate cancer using 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound images: A pilot study
    Garg, S
    Fortling, B
    Chadwick, D
    Robinson, MC
    Hamdy, FC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (04): : 1318 - 1321
  • [45] LOCALIZED STAGING OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA - COMPARISON OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    DRAGO, JR
    BADALAMENT, RA
    NESBITT, JA
    GERANIOTIS, E
    HORCHAK, A
    UROLOGY, 1990, 35 (06) : 511 - 512
  • [46] Re: Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Reply
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (06): : 1888 - 1889
  • [47] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy EDITORIAL COMMENTS
    Jones, J. Stephen
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1754 - 1754
  • [48] New integrated imaging high intensity focused ultrasound probe for transrectal prostate cancer treatment
    Pichardo, S.
    Gelet, A.
    Curiel, L.
    Chesnais, S.
    Chapelon, J. -Y.
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 34 (07): : 1105 - 1116
  • [49] Endorectal Digital Prostate Tomosynthesis: A Novel High-Resolution Imaging Method for the Prostate Region
    Steiner, J.
    Matthews, K.
    Jia, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E370 - E370
  • [50] Dermatology Ultrasound. Imaging Technique, Tips and Tricks, High-Resolution Anatomy
    Catalano, Orlando
    Wortsman, Ximena
    ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2020, 36 (04) : 321 - 327