AIC, BIC, Bayesian evidence against the interacting dark energy model

被引:29
|
作者
Szydlowski, Marek [1 ,3 ]
Krawiec, Adam [2 ,3 ]
Kurek, Aleksandra [1 ]
Kamionka, Michal [4 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Astron Observ, PL-30244 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Econ Finance & Management, PL-30348 Krakow, Poland
[3] Jagiellonian Univ, Mark Kac Complex Syst Res Ctr, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
[4] Univ Wroclaw, Astron Inst, PL-51622 Wroclaw, Poland
来源
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C | 2015年 / 75卷 / 01期
关键词
BARYON ACOUSTIC-OSCILLATIONS; COSMOLOGICAL MODEL; EXPANSION; PARAMETERS; EFFICIENT; SELECTION; UNIVERSE; HISTORY; FUTURE; BRANE;
D O I
10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3236-1
中图分类号
O412 [相对论、场论]; O572.2 [粒子物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent astronomical observations have indicated that the Universe is in a phase of accelerated expansion. While there are many cosmological models which try to explain this phenomenon, we focus on the interacting Lambda CDM model where an interaction between the dark energy and dark matter sectors takes place. This model is compared to its simpler alternative-the Lambda CDM model. To choose between these models the likelihood ratio test was applied as well as the model comparison methods (employing Occam's principle): the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the Bayesian evidence. Using the current astronomical data: type Ia supernova (Union2.1), h(z), baryon acoustic oscillation, the Alcock-Paczynski test, and the cosmic microwave background data, we evaluated both models. The analyses based on the AIC indicated that there is less support for the interacting Lambda CDM model when compared to the Lambda CDM model, while those based on the BIC indicated that there is strong evidence against it in favor of the Lambda CDM model. Given the weak or almost non-existing support for the interacting Lambda CDM model and bearing in mind Occam's razor we are inclined to reject this model.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bayesian comparison of interacting modified holographic Ricci dark energy scenarios
    Antonella Cid
    Carlos Rodriguez-Benites
    Mauricio Cataldo
    Gonzalo Casanova
    The European Physical Journal C, 2021, 81
  • [32] Assessing risk factors of human complex diseases by Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (AIC and BIC).
    Li, W
    Sherriff, A
    Liu, X
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 67 (04) : 222 - 222
  • [33] Bayesian comparison of interacting modified holographic Ricci dark energy scenarios
    Cid, Antonella
    Rodriguez-Benites, Carlos
    Cataldo, Mauricio
    Casanova, Gonzalo
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2021, 81 (01):
  • [34] Revealing the nature of dark energy using Bayesian evidence
    Saini, TD
    Weller, J
    Bridle, SL
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 348 (02) : 603 - 608
  • [35] Testing interacting dark matter and dark energy model with cosmological data
    Cheng, Gong
    Ma, Yin-Zhe
    Wu, Fengquan
    Zhang, Jiajun
    Chen, Xuelei
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2020, 102 (04)
  • [36] Observational constraints on interacting dark matter model without dark energy
    Cao, S.
    Zhu, Z. -H.
    Liang, N.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2011, 529
  • [37] Statefinder diagnosis and the interacting ghost model of dark energy
    M. Malekjani
    A. Khodam-Mohammadi
    Astrophysics and Space Science, 2013, 343 : 451 - 461
  • [38] Observational constraints on a holographic, interacting dark energy model
    Ivan Duran
    Pavon, Diego
    Zimdahl, Winfried
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2010, (07):
  • [39] Revisiting the interacting model of new agegraphic dark energy
    ZHANG JingFei
    ZHAO LiAng
    ZHANG Xin
    Science China(Physics,Mechanics & Astronomy), 2014, (02) : 387 - 392
  • [40] A more general interacting model of holographic dark energy
    Yu, Fei
    Zhang, Jingfei
    Lu, Jianbo
    Wang, Wei
    Gui, Yuanxing
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2010, 688 (4-5) : 263 - 268