AIC, BIC, Bayesian evidence against the interacting dark energy model

被引:29
|
作者
Szydlowski, Marek [1 ,3 ]
Krawiec, Adam [2 ,3 ]
Kurek, Aleksandra [1 ]
Kamionka, Michal [4 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Astron Observ, PL-30244 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Econ Finance & Management, PL-30348 Krakow, Poland
[3] Jagiellonian Univ, Mark Kac Complex Syst Res Ctr, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
[4] Univ Wroclaw, Astron Inst, PL-51622 Wroclaw, Poland
来源
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C | 2015年 / 75卷 / 01期
关键词
BARYON ACOUSTIC-OSCILLATIONS; COSMOLOGICAL MODEL; EXPANSION; PARAMETERS; EFFICIENT; SELECTION; UNIVERSE; HISTORY; FUTURE; BRANE;
D O I
10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3236-1
中图分类号
O412 [相对论、场论]; O572.2 [粒子物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent astronomical observations have indicated that the Universe is in a phase of accelerated expansion. While there are many cosmological models which try to explain this phenomenon, we focus on the interacting Lambda CDM model where an interaction between the dark energy and dark matter sectors takes place. This model is compared to its simpler alternative-the Lambda CDM model. To choose between these models the likelihood ratio test was applied as well as the model comparison methods (employing Occam's principle): the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the Bayesian evidence. Using the current astronomical data: type Ia supernova (Union2.1), h(z), baryon acoustic oscillation, the Alcock-Paczynski test, and the cosmic microwave background data, we evaluated both models. The analyses based on the AIC indicated that there is less support for the interacting Lambda CDM model when compared to the Lambda CDM model, while those based on the BIC indicated that there is strong evidence against it in favor of the Lambda CDM model. Given the weak or almost non-existing support for the interacting Lambda CDM model and bearing in mind Occam's razor we are inclined to reject this model.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AIC, BIC, Bayesian evidence against the interacting dark energy model
    Marek Szydłowski
    Adam Krawiec
    Aleksandra Kurek
    Michał Kamionka
    The European Physical Journal C, 2015, 75
  • [2] AIC and BIC for cosmological interacting scenarios
    Fabiola Arevalo
    Antonella Cid
    Jorge Moya
    The European Physical Journal C, 2017, 77
  • [3] AIC and BIC for cosmological interacting scenarios
    Arevalo, Fabiola
    Cid, Antonella
    Moya, Jorge
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2017, 77 (08):
  • [4] Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC
    Aho, Ken
    Derryberry, DeWayne
    Peterson, Teri
    ECOLOGY, 2014, 95 (03) : 631 - 636
  • [5] Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection
    Burnham, KP
    Anderson, DR
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2004, 33 (02) : 261 - 304
  • [6] The ABC of model selection:: AIC, BIC and the new CIC
    Rodríguez, CC
    Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, 2005, 803 : 80 - 87
  • [7] Interacting Induced Dark Energy Model
    Bahrehbakhsh, Amir E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 57 (09) : 2881 - 2891
  • [8] ON THE TRIPLE INTERACTING DARK ENERGY MODEL
    Huang, Peng
    Huang, Yong-Chang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2013, 22 (08):
  • [9] Interacting Induced Dark Energy Model
    Amir F. Bahrehbakhsh
    International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2018, 57 : 2881 - 2891
  • [10] Evidence for interacting dark energy from BOSS
    Ferreira, Elisa G. M.
    Quintin, Jerome
    Costa, Andre A.
    Abdalla, E.
    Wang, Bin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2017, 95 (04)