Automatic Annotation and Evaluation of Error Types for Grammatical Error Correction

被引:97
|
作者
Bryant, Christopher [1 ]
Felice, Mariano [1 ]
Briscoe, Ted [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Comp Lab, ALTA Inst, Cambridge, England
关键词
D O I
10.18653/v1/P17-1074
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Until now, error type performance for Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) systems could only be measured in terms of recall because system output is not annotated. To overcome this problem, we introduce ERRANT, a grammatical ERRor ANnotation Toolkit designed to automatically extract edits from parallel original and corrected sentences and classify them according to a new, dataset-agnostic, rule-based framework. This not only facilitates error type evaluation at different levels of granularity, but can also be used to reduce annotator workload and standardise existing GEC datasets. Human experts rated the automatic edits as "Good" or "Acceptable" in at least 95% of cases, so we applied ERRANT to the system output of the CoNLL-2014 shared task to carry out a detailed error type analysis for the first time.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 805
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] French error type annotation for dictation: A platform with automatic error type annotation for French dictation exercises
    Qin, Ying
    Luo, Yumeng
    Zhai, Yuming
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [42] Grammatical Error Correction in Low Error Density Domains: A New Benchmark and Analyses
    Flachs, Simon
    Lacroix, Ophelie
    Yannakoudakis, Helen
    Rei, Marek
    Sogaard, Anders
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP), 2020, : 8467 - 8478
  • [43] Construction of an Evaluation Corpus for Grammatical Error Correction for Learners of Japanese as a Second Language
    Koyama, Aomi
    Kiyuna, Tomoshige
    Kobayashi, Kenji
    Arai, Mio
    Komachi, Mamoru
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION (LREC 2020), 2020, : 204 - 211
  • [44] A GRAMMATICAL ERROR
    Bryan, Douglas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOANALYSIS, 1922, 3 : 332 - 332
  • [45] Towards Automatic Grammatical Error Type Classification for Turkish
    Uz, Harun
    Eryigit, Gulsen
    [J]. 17TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, EACL 2023, 2023, : 134 - 142
  • [46] GRAMMATICAL ERROR
    GOOD, IJ
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1977, 31 (01): : 50 - 50
  • [47] Deep Sentence Denoising beyond Grammatical Error Correction
    Liang, Zhantong
    Youssef, Abdou
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2021, : 1686 - 1691
  • [48] Diversity-Driven Combination for Grammatical Error Correction
    Han, Wenjuan
    Ng, Hwee Tou
    [J]. 2021 IEEE 33RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICTAI 2021), 2021, : 972 - 979
  • [49] How Good (really) are Grammatical Error Correction Systems?
    Rozovskaya, Alla
    Roth, Dan
    [J]. 16TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (EACL 2021), 2021, : 2686 - 2698
  • [50] A Hybrid System for Chinese Grammatical Error Diagnosis and Correction
    Li, Chen
    Zhou, Junpei
    Bao, Zuyi
    Liu, Hengyou
    Xu, Guangwei
    Li, Linlin
    [J]. NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES FOR EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS, 2018, : 60 - 69