High-risk melanoma: Accuracy of FDG PET/CT with added CT morphologic information for detection of metastases

被引:94
|
作者
Strobel, Klaus
Dummer, Reinhard
Husarik, Daniela B.
Lago, Marisol Perez
Hany, Thomas F.
Steinert, Hans C.
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Med Radiol, Div Nucl Med, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Dermatol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2442061099
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively determine the accuracy of positron emission tomography ( PET)/computed tomography (CT) with added CT morphologic information for depiction of metastases in patients with high-risk melanoma and negative findings for metastases at PET, by using histologic findings or additional imaging and/or follow-up findings as reference standard. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Informed consent was obtained from patients. One hundred twenty- four consecutive high-risk melanoma patients (65 female, 59 male; mean age, 54.4 years; range, 15-82 years) were included. Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/ CT was performed. First, PET/CT scans were evaluated for presence of metastases with increased FDG uptake; CT anatomic location was determined. Lesions were considered metastases if there was focal uptake higher than that of background tissue. Second, coregistered CT images of combined PET/ CT scans were evaluated for presence of lesions without FDG uptake. Findings were compared with reference standard findings to determine the accuracy of each evaluation. McNemar test was used to assess statistical differences in accuracy. Results: In 53 of 124 patients, metastases were found. In 46 of 53 patients with metastases, lesions had increased FDG uptake. In seven patients with metastatic disease, metastases did not have increased FDG uptake (maximum standard uptake value [SUV], < 1.5; n = 5) or had faint FDG uptake (maximum SUV, 2.5 and 2.9; n = 2) - findings that were inconclusive with PET alone. These lesions were interpreted as metastases only with coregistered CT images. Lesions missed with PET were located in the lungs, iliac lymph nodes, subcutis, and psoas muscle. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, of PET/CT for depiction of metastases were 85%, 96%, and 91%, and those of PET/CT with dedicated CT interpretation were 98%, 94%, and 96% (P =.016). Conclusion: Dedicated analysis of coregistered CT images significantly improves the accuracy of integrated PET/CT for depiction of metastases in patients with high-risk melanoma.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 574
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of FLT-PET/CT and FDG-PET/CT in detection of metastases of differentiated thyroid cancer
    Murai, A.
    Kato, K.
    Iwano, S.
    Ito, S.
    Naganawa, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 : S366 - S366
  • [22] Detection of bone metastases: Assessment of integrated FDG PET/CT imaging
    Taira, Al V.
    Herfkens, Robert J.
    Gambhir, Sam S.
    Quon, Andrew
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (01) : 204 - 211
  • [23] FDG PET and PET/CT imaging in lymphoma and melanoma
    Macapinlac, HA
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2004, 10 (04): : 262 - 270
  • [24] Interpretation, accuracy and management implications of FDG PET/CT in cutaneous malignant melanoma
    Falk, Matthew S.
    Truitt, Anne K.
    Coakley, Fergus V.
    Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed
    Hawkins, Randall A.
    Franc, Benjamin
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2007, 28 (04) : 273 - 280
  • [25] FDG-PET/CT, a Promising Exam for Detecting High-Risk Myeloma Patients?
    Michaud-Robert, Anne-Victoire
    Jamet, Bastien
    Bailly, Clement
    Carlier, Thomas
    Moreau, Philippe
    Touzeau, Cyrille
    Bourgeois, Mickael
    Kraeber-Bodere, Francoise
    Bodet-Milin, Caroline
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [26] FDG-PET/CT in the Evaluation of High-Risk Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin
    Sabate-Llobera, A.
    Notta, P. C.
    Llinares, E.
    Marcoval, J.
    Ferreres, J. R.
    Bermejo, J. O.
    Rodriguez-Bel, L.
    Penin, R. M.
    Jimenez-Colomo, L.
    Cortes-Romera, M.
    Gamez-Cenzano, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S520 - S520
  • [27] PET/CT in High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    不详
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (06) : 30N - 30N
  • [28] The value of FDG PET/CT for risk stratification in patients with malignant melanoma
    Essler, M.
    Link, A.
    Belloni, B.
    Micerva, V.
    Herrmann, K.
    Hein, R.
    Krause, B. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 : S273 - S273
  • [29] Primary Anorectal Melanoma on FDG PET/CT
    Li, Zu-Gui
    Qin, Xiao-Jing
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 39 (08) : 762 - 764
  • [30] Unusual presentations of Melanoma on FDG PET/CT
    Lulaj, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58