Success rates of re-excision after positive margins for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

被引:30
|
作者
Piper, Merisa L. [1 ]
Wong, Jasmine [2 ]
Fahrner-Scott, Kelly [2 ]
Ewing, Cheryl [2 ]
Alvarado, Michael [2 ]
Esserman, Laura J. [2 ]
Mukhtar, Rita A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Gen Surg, Dept Surg, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
CONSERVING SURGERY; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; STAGE-I; CANCER; CONSERVATION; RESECTION; REOPERATION; IRRADIATION; RECURRENCE; LUMPECTOMY;
D O I
10.1038/s41523-019-0125-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Rates of positive margins after surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are high (ranging from 18 to 60%), yet the efficacy of re-excision lumpReceptor subtypeectomy for clearing positive margins is unknown. Concerns about the diffuse nature of ILC may drive increased rates of completion mastectomy to treat positive margins, thus lowering breast conservation rates. We therefore determined the success rate of re-excision lumpectomy in women with ILC and positive margins after surgical resection. We identified 314 cases of stage I-III ILC treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) at the University of California, San Francisco. Surgical procedures, pathology reports, and outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistics and Cox-proportional hazards models. We evaluated outcomes before and after the year 2014, when new margin management consensus guidelines were published. Positive initial margins occurred in 118 (37.6%) cases. Of these, 62 (52.5%) underwent re-excision lumpectomy, which cleared the margin in 74.2%. On multivariate analysis, node negativity was significantly associated with successful re-excision (odds ratio [OR] 3.99, 95% CI 1.15-13.81, p = 0.029). After 2014, we saw fewer initial positive margins (42.7% versus 25.5%, p = 0.009), second surgeries (54.6% versus 20.2%, p < 0.001), and completion mastectomies (27.7% versus 4.5%, p < 0.001). In this large cohort of women with ILC, re-excision lumpectomy was highly successful at clearing positive margins. Additionally, positive margins and completion mastectomy rates significantly decreased over time. These findings highlight improvements in management of ILC, and suggest that completion mastectomy may not be required for those with positive margins after initial BCS.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recurrence rates and analysis of close or positive margins in patients treated without re-excision before radiation for breast cancer
    McIntosh, Alyson
    Freedman, Gary
    Eisenberg, Debra
    Anderson, Penny
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 30 (02): : 146 - 151
  • [42] A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of successful re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer in patients with close or positive margins
    Specht, M.
    Hanson, S.
    Niemierko, A.
    Wheeler, A. J.
    Taghian, A. G.
    Smith, B. L.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 : 60 - 60
  • [43] Relationship between initial margin status and residual carcinoma after re-excision for invasive duct breast carcinoma
    Kotwall, C
    Ranson, M
    Stiles, A
    Hamann, M
    Hall, T
    Brinker, C
    Weiss, A
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (02) : S93 - S93
  • [44] Relationship between initial margin status and residual carcinoma after re-excision for invasive duct breast carcinoma
    C. Kotwall
    M. Ranson
    A. Stiles
    M. Hamann
    T. Hall
    C. Brinker
    A. Weiss
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2004, 11 : S93 - S93
  • [45] Mastectomy or Margin Re-excision? A Nomogram for Close/Positive Margins After Lumpectomy for DCIS
    Maia, Catarina Martins
    Siderides, Cleo
    Jaffer, Shabnam
    Weltz, Christina
    Cate, Sarah
    Ahn, Soojin
    Boolbol, Susan
    Ru, Meng
    Moshier, Erin
    Port, Elisa
    Schmidt, Hank
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (06) : 3740 - 3748
  • [46] Mastectomy or Margin Re-excision? A Nomogram for Close/Positive Margins After Lumpectomy for DCIS
    Schmidt, H.
    Jaffer, S.
    Maia, C.
    Siderides, C.
    Pisapati, K.
    Weltz, C.
    Cate, S.
    Boolbol, S.
    Ahn, S.
    Ru, M.
    Moshier, E.
    Port, E.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S13 - S13
  • [47] Re-excision of margins before breast radiation - Diagnostic or therapeutic?
    Chism, Derek B.
    Freedman, Gary M.
    Li, Tianyu
    Anderson, Penny R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (05): : 1416 - 1421
  • [48] Mastectomy or Margin Re-excision? A Nomogram for Close/Positive Margins After Lumpectomy for DCIS
    Catarina Martins Maia
    Cleo Siderides
    Shabnam Jaffer
    Christina Weltz
    Sarah Cate
    Soojin Ahn
    Susan Boolbol
    Meng Ru
    Erin Moshier
    Elisa Port
    Hank Schmidt
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 3740 - 3748
  • [49] Selective shave margins does not decrease positive margin or re-excision rates for patients undergoing breast-conservative therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ
    Siegel, Emily
    Manguso, Nicholas
    Carlson, Kjirsten
    Kim, Sungjin
    Giuliano, Armando
    Amersi, Farin
    Chung, Alice
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : 559 - 560
  • [50] Do Lumpectomy Cavity Shaved Margins Really Not Impact Re-excision Rates in Breast Cancer?
    Bricou, Alexandre
    Sakr, Rita
    Barranger, Emmanuel
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 : S585 - S585