Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section

被引:15
|
作者
Zhou, Xingchen [1 ]
Zhang, Tao [2 ]
Qiao, Huayuan [3 ]
Zhang, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Xipeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Xinhua Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1665 Kong Jiang Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Municipal Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Matern & Infant Hosp 1, Dept Ultrasound, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Cesarean section; Cesarean scar defect (CSD); Thickness of residual myometrial (TRM); Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS); Predictive model; SEGMENT THICKNESS; VAGINAL REPAIR; RISK-FACTORS; INCISION; PREVALENCE; SONOGRAPHY; NICHE; HYSTEROSCOPY; PREDICTION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-021-01337-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Caesarean scar defect (CSD) seriously affects female reproductive health. In this study, we aim to evaluate uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) in nonpregnant women with cesarean section (CS) history and to build a predictive model for cesarean scar defects is very necessary. Methods A total of 607 nonpregnant women with previous CS who have transvaginal ultrasound measurements of the thickness of the lower uterine segment. The related clinical data were recorded and analyzed. Results All patients were divided into two groups according to their clinical symptoms: Group A (N = 405) who had no cesarean scar symptoms, and Group B (N = 141) who had cesarean scar symptoms. The difference in frequency of CS, uterine position, detection rate of CSD and the residual muscular layer (TRM) of the CSD were statistically significant between groups; the TRM measurements of the two groups were (mm) 5.39 +/- 3.34 versus 3.22 +/- 2.33, P < 0.05. All patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had CSDs: Group C (N = 337) who had no CSDs, Group D (N = 209) who had CSDs on ultrasound examination. The differences in frequency of CS, uterine position, TRM between groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the model predicting CSDs by TRM with TVS, the area under the ROC curve was 0.771, the cut-off value was 4.15 mm. The sensitivity and specificity were 87.8% and 71.3%, respectively. Conclusions Patients with no clinical symptoms had a mean TRM on transvaginal ultrasonography of 5.39 +/- 3.34 mm, which could be used as a good reference to predict the recovery of patients with CSDs after repair surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section
    Xingchen Zhou
    Tao Zhang
    Huayuan Qiao
    Yi Zhang
    Xipeng Wang
    BMC Women's Health, 21
  • [2] Evaluation of the uterine scar stiffness in women with previous Cesarean section by ultrasound elastography: A cohort study
    di Pasquo, Elvira
    Jeanne, Ariane
    Kiener, Odette
    DallAsta, Andrea
    Commare, Arianna
    Angeli, Laura
    Frusca, Tiziana
    Ghi, Tullio
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2020, 64 (64) : 53 - 56
  • [3] Laparoscopic Repair of Post-Cesarean Section Uterine Scar Defects Diagnosed in Nonpregnant Women
    Marotta, Maria-Laura
    Donnez, Jacques
    Squifflet, Jean
    Jadoul, Pascale
    Darii, Natalia
    Donnez, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 20 (03) : 386 - 391
  • [4] Clinical Importance of Appearance of Cesarean Hysterotomy Scar at Transvaginal Ultrasonography in Nonpregnant Women
    Osser, Olga Vikhareva
    Valentin, Lil
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (03): : 525 - 532
  • [5] Ultrasound Exploration of the Uterine Scar After Cesarean Section
    Nour, Corina Madalina
    Penciu, Roxana Cleopatra
    Izvoranu, Silvia
    Steriu, Liliana
    Postolache, Iulia
    PROCEEDINGS OF SOGR 2018: THE 17TH NATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE ROMANIAN SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY & FIRST ADVANCED COLPOSCOPY COURSE, 2019, : 557 - 560
  • [6] Pitfall in Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar from Prior Preterm Cesarean Section
    Laflamme, Sarah-Maude B.
    Jastrow, Nicole
    Girard, Mario
    Paris, Gaetan
    Berube, Laurie
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    AJP REPORTS, 2011, 1 (01): : 65 - 68
  • [7] Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of cesarean section scar niche in pregnancy
    Savukyne, Egle
    Machtejeviene, Egle
    Kliucinskas, Mindaugas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 293 : 297 - 298
  • [8] Clinical Importance of Appearance of Cesarean Hysterotomy Scar at Transvaginal Ultrasonography in Nonpregnant Women Reply
    Osser, Olga Vikhareva
    Valentin, Lil
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (06): : 1438 - 1439
  • [9] Transvaginal Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar Predicting the Spontaneous Delivery after C-section
    Bot, Mihaela
    Gavril, Andra
    Burnei, Anca
    Mehedintu, Claudia
    Vladareanu, Radu
    13TH CONFERENCE OF THE ROMANIAN-GERMAN SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, : 70 - 76
  • [10] Challenges in the transvaginal management of abnormal uterine bleeding secondary to cesarean section scar defect
    Wang, Chin-Jung
    Huang, Huei-Jean
    Chao, Angel
    Lin, Yu-Pin
    Pan, Yi-Jung
    Horng, Shang-Gwo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 154 (02) : 218 - 222