COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS VIA GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR VRPTW

被引:19
|
作者
Gocken, T. [1 ]
Yaktubay, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Adana Alparslan Turkes Sci & Technol Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Adana, Turkey
关键词
Vehicle Routing with Time Windows; Genetic Algorithm; Clustering; Multi-Objective Optimization; K-means Clustering Algorithm; VEHICLE-ROUTING PROBLEM; TIME WINDOW;
D O I
10.2507/IJSIMM18(4)485
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (VRPTW) with known customer demands, a central depot and a set of vehicles with limited capacity, is considered. The objectives are both to minimize the total distance and the total waiting time of the vehicles while capacity and time windows constraints are secured. The applied solution techniques consist of three steps: clustering, routing and optimizing. By using K-means, Centroid-based heuristic, DBSCAN and SNN clustering algorithms in the initial population generation phase of genetic algorithm, the customers are divided into feasible clusters. Then feasible routes are constructed for each cluster. Lastly, the feasible route solutions are taken as the initial population and genetic algorithm is utilized for the optimization. A set of well-known benchmark data is used to compare the obtained results. According to the results of the study it is observed that using K-means clustering algorithm in generating the initial population of the genetic algorithm is more effective for the handled problem.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 585
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Data Mining Clustering Algorithms
    Shah, Chintan
    Jivani, Anjali
    2013 4TH NIRMA UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING (NUICONE 2013), 2013,
  • [42] COMPARISON OF ALGORITHMS FOR CLUSTERING INCOMPLETE DATA
    Matyja, Artur
    Siminski, Krzysztof
    FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTING AND DECISION SCIENCES, 2014, 39 (02) : 107 - 127
  • [43] Comparison of fuzzy clustering algorithms for classification
    Almeida, R. J.
    Sousa, J. M. C.
    2006 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EVOLVING FUZZY SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 112 - +
  • [44] A Comparison of Clustering Algorithms for Data Streams
    Pereira, Cassio M. M.
    de Mello, Rodrigo F.
    INTEGRATED COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 165 : 59 - 74
  • [45] Consensus Clustering Algorithms: Comparison and Refinement
    Goder, Andrey
    Filkov, Vladimir
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH WORKSHOP ON ALGORITHM ENGINEERING AND EXPERIMENTS AND THE FIFTH WORKSHOP ON ANALYTIC ALGORITHMICS AND COMBINATORICS, 2008, : 109 - 117
  • [46] Data Clustering Algorithms: Experimentation and Comparison
    Khandare, Anand
    Pawar, Rutika
    INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND NETWORKING, IC-ICN 2021, 2022, 301 : 86 - 99
  • [47] A Comparison of Metrics and Algorithms for Fiber Clustering
    Siless, Viviana
    Medina, Sergio
    Varoquaux, Gael
    Thirion, Bertrand
    2013 3RD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PATTERN RECOGNITION IN NEUROIMAGING (PRNI 2013), 2013, : 190 - 193
  • [48] An Empirical Comparison of Stream Clustering Algorithms
    Carnein, Matthias
    Assenmacher, Dennis
    Trautmann, Heike
    ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FRONTIERS 2017, 2017, : 361 - 366
  • [49] Genetic algorithm optimized feature transformation - A comparison with different classifiers
    Huang, ZJ
    Pei, M
    Goodman, E
    Huang, Y
    Li, GP
    GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION - GECCO 2003, PT II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2724 : 2121 - 2133
  • [50] Correlation Clustering Based on Genetic Algorithm for Documents Clustering
    Zhang, Zhenya
    Cheng, Hongmei
    Chen, Wanli
    Zhang, Shuguang
    Fang, Qiansheng
    2008 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 3193 - +