Beyond optimality: Multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water portfolio planning under deep uncertainty

被引:169
|
作者
Herman, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Zeff, Harrison B. [2 ]
Reed, Patrick M. [1 ]
Characklis, Gregory W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
regional water portfolio management; many-objective robust decision making; multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs; EVOLUTIONARY MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; COMPLEX; RISK; RESOURCES; POLICIES; DROUGHT; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1002/2014WR015338
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While optimality is a foundational mathematical concept in water resources planning and management, optimal solutions may be vulnerable to failure if deeply uncertain future conditions deviate from those assumed during optimization. These vulnerabilities may produce severely asymmetric impacts across a region, making it vital to evaluate the robustness of management strategies as well as their impacts for regional stakeholders. In this study, we contribute a multistakeholder many-objective robust decision making (MORDM) framework that blends many-objective search and uncertainty analysis tools to discover key tradeoffs between water supply alternatives and their robustness to deep uncertainties (e.g., population pressures, climate change, and financial risks). The proposed framework is demonstrated for four interconnected water utilities representing major stakeholders in the Research Triangle region of North Carolina, U.S. The utilities supply well over one million customers and have the ability to collectively manage drought via transfer agreements and shared infrastructure. We show that water portfolios for this region that compose optimal tradeoffs (i.e., Pareto-approximate solutions) under expected future conditions may suffer significantly degraded performance with only modest changes in deeply uncertain hydrologic and economic factors. We then use the Patient Rule Induction Method (PRIM) to identify which uncertain factors drive the individual and collective vulnerabilities for the four cooperating utilities. Our framework identifies key stakeholder dependencies and robustness tradeoffs associated with cooperative regional planning, which are critical to understanding the tensions between individual versus regional water supply goals. Cooperative demand management was found to be the key factor controlling the robustness of regional water supply planning, dominating other hydroclimatic and economic uncertainties through the 2025 planning horizon. Results suggest that a modest reduction in the projected rate of demand growth (from approximately 3% per year to 2.4%) will substantially improve the utilities' robustness to future uncertainty and reduce the potential for regional tensions. The proposed multistakeholder MORDM framework offers critical insights into the risks and challenges posed by rising water demands and hydrological uncertainties, providing a planning template for regions now forced to confront rapidly evolving water scarcity risks. Key Points We advance many-objective robust decision making for multiple stakeholders Stakeholders' robustness exhibits dependencies, vulnerabilities, and tradeoffs A modest reduction in demand growth rate insulates against future uncertainty
引用
收藏
页码:7692 / 7713
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simultaneous resource portfolio planning under demand and technology uncertainty in the semiconductor testing industry
    Wang, Kung-Jeng
    Wang, Shih-Min
    [J]. ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2013, 29 (05) : 278 - 287
  • [32] Multi-regional Transmission Planning under Interdependent Wind Uncertainty
    Tohidi, Yaser
    Hesamzadeh, Mohammad R.
    [J]. 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONFERENCE (ENERGYCON 2014), 2014, : 1474 - 1479
  • [33] Modeling Performance and Uncertainty of Construction Planning under Deep Uncertainty: A Prediction Interval Approach
    Wang, Shuo
    Feng, Kailun
    Wang, Yaowu
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [34] REGIONAL MULTIOBJECTIVE PLANNING UNDER UNCERTAINTY - STOCHASTIC GOAL PROGRAMMING FORMULATION
    DONCKELS, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 1977, 17 (02) : 207 - 216
  • [36] Reducing regional drought vulnerabilities and multi-city robustness conflicts using many-objective optimization under deep uncertainty
    Trindade, B. C.
    Reed, P. M.
    Herman, J. D.
    Zeff, H. B.
    Characklis, G. W.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2017, 104 : 195 - 209
  • [37] How Should Robustness Be Defined for Water Systems Planning under Change?
    Herman, Jonathan D.
    Reed, Patrick M.
    Zeff, Harrison B.
    Characklis, Gregory W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 141 (10)
  • [38] Reliable, Resilient and Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems: An Analysis of Robustness under Deep Uncertainty
    Casal-Campos, Arturo
    Sadr, Seyed M. K.
    Fu, Guangtao
    Butler, David
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (16) : 9008 - 9021
  • [39] Planning of water supply under uncertainty: The Dead Sea project
    Al-Weshah, RA
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING 98, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 1782 - 1786
  • [40] Adapt or Perish: A Review of Planning Approaches for Adaptation under Deep Uncertainty
    Walker, Warren E.
    Haasnoot, Marjolijn
    Kwakkel, Jan H.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (03) : 955 - 979