Beyond optimality: Multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water portfolio planning under deep uncertainty

被引:169
|
作者
Herman, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Zeff, Harrison B. [2 ]
Reed, Patrick M. [1 ]
Characklis, Gregory W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
regional water portfolio management; many-objective robust decision making; multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs; EVOLUTIONARY MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; COMPLEX; RISK; RESOURCES; POLICIES; DROUGHT; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1002/2014WR015338
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While optimality is a foundational mathematical concept in water resources planning and management, optimal solutions may be vulnerable to failure if deeply uncertain future conditions deviate from those assumed during optimization. These vulnerabilities may produce severely asymmetric impacts across a region, making it vital to evaluate the robustness of management strategies as well as their impacts for regional stakeholders. In this study, we contribute a multistakeholder many-objective robust decision making (MORDM) framework that blends many-objective search and uncertainty analysis tools to discover key tradeoffs between water supply alternatives and their robustness to deep uncertainties (e.g., population pressures, climate change, and financial risks). The proposed framework is demonstrated for four interconnected water utilities representing major stakeholders in the Research Triangle region of North Carolina, U.S. The utilities supply well over one million customers and have the ability to collectively manage drought via transfer agreements and shared infrastructure. We show that water portfolios for this region that compose optimal tradeoffs (i.e., Pareto-approximate solutions) under expected future conditions may suffer significantly degraded performance with only modest changes in deeply uncertain hydrologic and economic factors. We then use the Patient Rule Induction Method (PRIM) to identify which uncertain factors drive the individual and collective vulnerabilities for the four cooperating utilities. Our framework identifies key stakeholder dependencies and robustness tradeoffs associated with cooperative regional planning, which are critical to understanding the tensions between individual versus regional water supply goals. Cooperative demand management was found to be the key factor controlling the robustness of regional water supply planning, dominating other hydroclimatic and economic uncertainties through the 2025 planning horizon. Results suggest that a modest reduction in the projected rate of demand growth (from approximately 3% per year to 2.4%) will substantially improve the utilities' robustness to future uncertainty and reduce the potential for regional tensions. The proposed multistakeholder MORDM framework offers critical insights into the risks and challenges posed by rising water demands and hydrological uncertainties, providing a planning template for regions now forced to confront rapidly evolving water scarcity risks. Key Points We advance many-objective robust decision making for multiple stakeholders Stakeholders' robustness exhibits dependencies, vulnerabilities, and tradeoffs A modest reduction in demand growth rate insulates against future uncertainty
引用
收藏
页码:7692 / 7713
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimality and Robustness in Path-Planning Under Initial Uncertainty
    Qi, Dongping
    Dhillon, Adam
    Vladimirsky, Alexander
    [J]. DYNAMIC GAMES AND APPLICATIONS, 2024,
  • [2] Risk, Robustness and Water Resources Planning Under Uncertainty
    Borgomeo, Edoardo
    Mortazavi-Naeini, Mohammad
    Hall, Jim W.
    Guillod, Benoit P.
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2018, 6 (03): : 468 - 487
  • [3] Many-objective de Novo water supply portfolio planning under deep uncertainty
    Kasprzyk, Joseph R.
    Reed, Patrick M.
    Characklis, Gregory W.
    Kirsch, Brian R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2012, 34 : 87 - 104
  • [4] Robustness-Optimality Tradeoff for Watershed Load Reduction Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty
    Han Su
    Feifei Dong
    Yong Liu
    Rui Zou
    Huaicheng Guo
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2017, 31 : 3627 - 3640
  • [5] Robustness-Optimality Tradeoff for Watershed Load Reduction Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty
    Su, Han
    Dong, Feifei
    Liu, Yong
    Zou, Rui
    Guo, Huaicheng
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (11) : 3627 - 3640
  • [6] Optimization Model for Planning Regional Water Resource Systems under Uncertainty
    Miao, D. Y.
    Li, Y. P.
    Huang, G. H.
    Yang, Z. F.
    Li, C. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 140 (02) : 238 - 249
  • [7] Planning water-food-ecology nexus system under uncertainty: Tradeoffs and synergies in Central Asia
    Ma, Y.
    Li, Y. P.
    Huang, G. H.
    Zhang, Y. F.
    Liu, Y. R.
    Wang, H.
    Ding, Y. K.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 266
  • [8] The CLIOSjre Process: A Flexible Multicriteria, Multistakeholder Decision Framework for Transportation Planning under Uncertainty
    Moody, Joanna
    Doyle, Timothy Patton
    Middleton, Scott
    Sussman, Joseph
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2018, 2672 (44) : 82 - 92
  • [9] Disassembly and Reassembly Sequence Planning Tradeoffs Under Uncertainty for Product Maintenance
    Behdad, Sara
    Thurston, Deborah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2012, 134 (04)
  • [10] A general methodology for adaptative planning of urban water systems under deep uncertainty
    Araujo, Bruna Mattos
    Pacheco, Gabriela Cristina Ribeiro
    Fernandes, Camila Yarla
    Lima, Diego da Silva
    Alves, Conceicao de Maria Albuquerque
    [J]. RBRH-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE RECURSOS HIDRICOS, 2023, 28