Self-calibration of photometric redshift scatter in weak-lensing surveys

被引:43
|
作者
Zhang, Pengjie [1 ]
Pen, Ue-Li [2 ]
Bernstein, Gary [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Astron Observ, Key Lab Res Galaxies & Cosmol, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Toronto, Canadian Inst Theoret Astrophys, Toronto, ON M5S 3H8, Canada
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Phys & Astron, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
gravitational lensing; cosmology: observations; cosmology: theory; large-scale structure of Universe; LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE; INTRINSIC ELLIPTICITY CORRELATION; MATTER POWER SPECTRUM; LUMINOUS RED GALAXIES; DIGITAL SKY SURVEY; DARK-MATTER; SHEAR; BARYONS; REQUIREMENTS; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16445.x
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Photometric redshift (photo-z) errors, especially catastrophic errors, are a major uncertainty for precision weak-lensing cosmology. We find that the shear (galaxy number) density and density-density cross-correlation measurements between photo-z bins, available from the same lensing surveys, contain valuable information for self-calibration of the scattering probabilities between the true redshift and photo-z bins. The self-calibration technique we propose does not rely on cosmological priors nor parameterization of the photo-z probability distribution function, and preserves all of the cosmological information available from shear-shear measurement. We estimate the calibration accuracy through the Fisher matrix formalism. We find that, for advanced lensing surveys such as the planned Stage IV surveys, the rate of photo-z outliers can be determined with statistical uncertainties of 0.01-1 per cent for z < 2 galaxies. Among the several sources of calibration error that we identify and investigate, the galaxy distribution bias is likely the most dominant systematic error, whereby photo-z outliers have different redshift distributions and/or bias than non-outliers from the same bin. This bias affects all photo-z calibration techniques based on correlation measurements. Galaxy bias variations of O(0.1) produce biases in photo-z outlier rates similar to the statistical errors of our method, so this galaxy distribution bias may bias the reconstructed scatters at several-Sigma level, but is unlikely to completely invalidate the self-calibration technique.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 374
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Calibration of weak-lensing shear in the Kilo-Degree Survey
    Conti, I. Fenech
    Herbonnet, R.
    Hoekstra, H.
    Merten, J.
    Miller, L.
    Viola, M.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 467 (02) : 1627 - 1651
  • [32] Robust weak-lensing mass calibration of Planck galaxy clusters
    von der Linden, Anja
    Mantz, Adam
    Allen, Steven W.
    Applegate, Douglas E.
    Kelly, Patrick L.
    Morris, R. Glenn
    Wright, Adam
    Allen, Mark T.
    Burchat, Patricia R.
    Burke, David L.
    Donovan, David
    Ebeling, Harald
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 443 (03) : 1973 - 1978
  • [33] Estimating the weak-lensing rotation signal in radio cosmic shear surveys
    Thomas D.B.
    Whittaker L.
    Camera S.
    Brown M.L.
    Thomas, Daniel B. (daniel.thomas-2@manchester.ac.uk), 2017, Oxford University Press (470) : 3131 - 3148
  • [34] Estimating the weak-lensing rotation signal in radio cosmic shear surveys
    Thomas, Daniel B.
    Whittaker, Lee
    Camera, Stefano
    Brown, Michael L.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 470 (03) : 3131 - 3148
  • [35] Designing future dark energy space missions II. Photometric redshift of space weak lensing optimized surveys
    Jouvel, S.
    Kneib, J. -P.
    Bernstein, G.
    Ilbert, O.
    Jelinsky, P.
    Milliard, B.
    Ealet, A.
    Schimd, C.
    Dahlen, T.
    Arnouts, S.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2011, 532
  • [36] BIASED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM NEGLECTING REDUCED SHEAR IN WEAK-LENSING SURVEYS
    Shapiro, Charles
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 696 (01): : 775 - 784
  • [37] On the estimation of gravity-induced non-Gaussianities from weak-lensing surveys
    Valageas, P
    Munshi, D
    Barber, AJ
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 356 (01) : 386 - 400
  • [38] Accuracy of photometric redshifts for future weak lensing surveys from space
    Bellagamba, F.
    Meneghetti, M.
    Moscardini, L.
    Bolzonella, M.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 422 (01) : 553 - 562
  • [39] Effects of the complex mass distribution of dark matter halos on weak-lensing cluster surveys
    Tang, JY
    Fan, ZH
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 635 (01): : 60 - 72
  • [40] Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: redshift distributions of the weak-lensing source galaxies
    Hoyle, B.
    Gruen, D.
    Bernstein, G. M.
    Rau, M. M.
    De Vicente, J.
    Hartley, G.
    Gaztanaga, E.
    DeRose, J.
    Troxel, M. A.
    Davis, C.
    Alarcon, A.
    MacCrann, N.
    Prat, J.
    Sanchez, C.
    Sheldon, E.
    Wechsler, R. H.
    Asorey, J.
    Becker, M. R.
    Bonnett, C.
    Rosell, A. Carnero
    Carollo, D.
    Kind, M. Carrasco
    Castander, F. J.
    Cawthon, R.
    Chang, C.
    Childress, M.
    Davis, T. M.
    Drlica-Wagner, A.
    Gatti, M.
    Glazebrook, K.
    Gschwend, J.
    Hinton, S. R.
    Hoormann, J. K.
    Kim, A. G.
    King, A.
    Kuehn, K.
    Lewis, G.
    Lidman, C.
    Lin, H.
    Macaulay, E.
    Maia, M. A. G.
    Martini, P.
    Mudd, D.
    Moller, A.
    Nichol, R. C.
    Ogando, R. L. C.
    Rollins, R. P.
    Roodman, A.
    Ross, A. J.
    Rozo, E.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 478 (01) : 592 - 610