Readmission and reoperation after midurethral sling

被引:8
|
作者
Hokenstad, Erik D. [1 ]
Glasgow, Amy E. [2 ]
Habermann, Elizabeth B. [2 ]
Occhino, John A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Urogynecol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deli, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Quality improvement readmission; Reoperation; Sling; Urinary incontinence; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; SURGERY; PROGRAM; TRENDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-017-3551-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
We aimed to determine the rate of readmission and reoperation for patients undergoing midurethral sling (MUS) placement for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried to identify all isolated MUS placed from 2012 through 2015 using the Current Procedural Terminology 4 (CPT-4) code for MUS with or without cystoscopy (57,288 +/- 52,000). The cohort was then reviewed for unplanned, related readmissions and reoperations within 30 days of MUS placement. Isolated MUS was placed in 9910 patients. Fifty-eight (0.59%) patients were readmitted and 81 (0.82%) had reoperation. The most common indications for readmission were related to the urinary tract, i.e., urinary retention (27.6%), non-surgical-site-related infection (15.5%), and medical related issues (15.5%) The most common indications for reoperation were urinary tract (60.5%), gastrointestinal (7.4%), and gynecologic, i.e., examination under anesthesia (6.2%). Body mass index (BMI) was less (p = 0.001), and operative time (p = 0.014) and length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.001) longer in patients who were readmitted. Those who underwent reoperation had longer LOS than those who did not have reoperation (p < 0.001). Upon multivariate analysis, BMI < 25 (all p < 0.05) and longer LOS maintained statistical significance as risk factors for those who experienced readmission or reoperation (p = 0.0406, p < 0001). Isolated MUS placement has low 30-day readmission and reoperation rates. Increased LOS was associated with readmission, while increased LOS and BMI < 25 were associated with reoperation within 30 days.
引用
收藏
页码:1367 / 1370
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MIDURETHRAL SLING FAILURE
    Kaaki, B.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S214 - S215
  • [32] Genitofemoral and Perineal Neuralgia After Transobturator Midurethral Sling
    Parnell, Brent A.
    Johnson, Elisabeth A.
    Zolnoun, Denniz A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (02): : 428 - 431
  • [33] Incarcerated prolapsed ureterocele after midurethral sling in women
    Ramart, Patkawat
    UROLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2018, 16 : 95 - 97
  • [34] Midurethral "sling on a string"
    Nygaard, Christiana
    Almeida, Nadiessa
    dos Santos, Thais Guimaraes
    Anele, Giovanna Petry
    Schreiner, Lucas
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 : 210 - 211
  • [35] Surgical considerations for recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling procedure: Redo midurethral sling and shortening of the tape with hemoclip
    Bae, J. H.
    Nahm, S. B.
    Lee, J. G.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 : S32 - S33
  • [36] Readmission and Reoperation After Living Donor Hepatectomy
    Kapoor, S.
    Nath, B.
    Varma, V.
    Sable, S.
    Chauhan, A.
    Kumaran, V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 591 - 591
  • [37] URETHROLYSIS/SLING TAKE DOWN AFTER ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY & CONCOMITANT MIDURETHRAL SINTETHIC SLING
    Romo, Paholo Barboglio
    Triaca, Veronica
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2014, 33 (02) : 259 - 259
  • [38] Examining Reoperation and Readmission after Hepatic Surgery
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    Turley, Ryan S.
    Mallipeddi, Mohan K.
    Lidsky, Michael E.
    Reddy, Srinevas K.
    White, Rebekah R.
    Clary, Bryan M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (05) : 915 - 923
  • [39] Repeat midurethral sling for female stress urinary incontinence after failure of the initial sling
    Saussine, C.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2009, 19 (09): : 595 - 595
  • [40] TRANSVAGINAL APPROACH TO URETHRAL RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MIDURETHRAL SLING COMPLICATION
    Nimeh, T.
    Constantini, E.
    Halgrimson, W.
    Di Biase, M.
    Kocjancic, E.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2015, 34 : S262 - S262