Side-by-side comparison of three sampling methods for aerosolized endotoxin in a wastewater treatment facility

被引:0
|
作者
Stephenson, DJ [1 ]
Lillquist, DR [1 ]
DeRosso, FD [1 ]
Greene, DD [1 ]
White, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Boise State Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Studies, Environm Hlth Program, Boise, ID 83725 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Research studies have established the occurrence of adverse health effects in individuals exposed to organic dusts and water aerosols laden with endotoxin. To determine what exposure levels cause these health effects, it is necessary to quantify airborne endotoxin. Several scientific studies have demonstrated that the quantification of detectable endotoxin is affected by differences in sampling media, analytical method, and aerosol composition. The study reported here performed side-by-side endotoxin sampling using a liquid impinger, a glass fiber filter, and a polycarbonate filter in a wastewater treatment plant. Results show levels of detected endotoxin appear to be highest with the impinger. Coefficients of variation calculated for each sampling method show the glass fiber filter having the least variability when sampling was conducted at the highest endotoxin levels. Lastly, a Spearman rank order correlation test identified an apparent correlation between endotoxin levels obtained with the impinger and the glass fiber filter.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 19
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Side-by-side comparison of erosion-resistant coatings
    Harris, DC
    [J]. WINDOW AND DOME TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS V, 1997, 3060 : 17 - 29
  • [22] A side-by-side comparison of Daya Bay antineutrino detectors
    An, F. P.
    An, Q.
    Bai, J. Z.
    Balantekin, A. B.
    Band, H. R.
    Beriguete, W.
    Bishai, M.
    Blyth, S.
    Brown, R. L.
    Cao, G. F.
    Cao, J.
    Carr, R.
    Chang, J. F.
    Chang, Y.
    Chasman, C.
    Chen, H. S.
    Chen, S. J.
    Chen, S. M.
    Chen, X. C.
    Chen, X. H.
    Chen, X. S.
    Chen, Y.
    Cherwinka, J. J.
    Chu, M. C.
    Cummings, J. P.
    Deng, Z. Y.
    Ding, Y. Y.
    Diwan, M. V.
    Draeger, E.
    Du, X. F.
    Dwyer, D.
    Edwards, W. R.
    Ely, S. R.
    Fang, S. D.
    Fu, J. Y.
    Fu, Z. W.
    Ge, L. Q.
    Gill, R. L.
    Gonchar, M.
    Gong, G. H.
    Gong, H.
    Gornushkin, Y. A.
    Greenler, L. S.
    Gu, W. Q.
    Guan, M. Y.
    Guo, X. H.
    Hackenburg, R. W.
    Hahn, R. L.
    Hans, S.
    Hao, H. F.
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2012, 685 : 78 - 97
  • [23] Acoustography: A side-by-side comparison with conventional ultrasonic scanning
    Sandhu, JS
    Wang, HH
    Popek, WJ
    Sincebaugh, P
    [J]. NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF AGING MATERIALS AND COMPOSITES III, 1999, 3585 : 163 - 172
  • [24] A side-by-side comparison of CPV module and system performance
    Muller, Matthew
    Marion, Bill
    Kurtz, Sarah
    Ghosal, Kanchan
    Burroughs, Scott
    Libby, Cara
    Enbar, Nadav
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2016, 24 (07): : 940 - 954
  • [25] VAV vs. Radiant Side-by-Side Comparison
    Sastry, Guruprakash
    Rumsey, Peter
    [J]. ASHRAE JOURNAL, 2014, 56 (05) : 16 - 24
  • [26] A Side-by-Side Comparison of Pervious Concrete and Porous Asphalt
    Welker, Andrea L.
    Barbis, James D.
    Jeffers, Patrick A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2012, 48 (04): : 809 - 819
  • [27] Topical tranexamic acid as an adjuvant treatment in melasma: Side-by-side comparison clinical study
    Chung, Jong Yoon
    Lee, Jong Hee
    Lee, Joo Heung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2016, 27 (04) : 373 - 377
  • [28] Forces and flow around three side-by-side square cylinders
    Zheng, Qinmin
    Alam, Md Mahbub
    Rehman, S.
    Maiti, D. K.
    [J]. WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2019, 29 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [29] Comparison between two methods of bilateral stenting: side-by-side versus stent-in-stent
    Kim, K. M.
    Bahng, S.
    Lee, K. H.
    Lee, J. K.
    Lee, K. T.
    Shin, J. U.
    Kim, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 : 44 - 44
  • [30] A Side-by-Side Comparison of Rotorod and Burkard Pollen and Spore Collections
    Crisp, Howard C.
    Gomez, Robert Anthony
    Quinn, James M.
    White, Kevin M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 131 (02) : AB78 - AB78