CLINICAL APPLICATION OF HIGH-DOSE, IMAGE-GUIDED INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY IN HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER

被引:23
|
作者
Bayley, Andrew [1 ]
Rosewall, Tara
Craig, Tim
Bristow, Rob
Chung, Peter
Gospodarowicz, Mary
Menard, Cynthia
Milosevic, Michael
Warde, Padraig
Catton, Charles
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
关键词
Dose escalation; Pelvic radiotherapy; Prostate cancer; Intensity modulated radiation therapy; Toxicity; CONFORMAL RADIATION-THERAPY; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; FIDUCIAL MARKERS; ACUTE TOXICITY; WHOLE-PELVIS; ESCALATION; NEOADJUVANT; IRRADIATION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report the feasibility and early toxicity of dose-escalated image-guided IMRT to the pelvic lymph nodes (LN), prostate (P), and seminal vesicles (SV). Methods and Materials: A total of 103 high-risk prostate cancer patients received two-phase, dose-escalated, image-guided IMRT with 3 years of androgen deprivation therapy. Clinical target volumes (CTVs) were delineated using computed tomography/magnetic resonance co-registration and included the prostate, portions of the SV, and the LN. Planning target volume margins (PTV) used were as follows: P (10 mm, 7 mm posteriorly), SV (10 mm), and LN (5 mm). Organs at risk (OaR) were the rectal and bladder walls, femoral heads, and large and small bowel. The IMRT was planned with an intended dose of 55.1 Gy in 29 fractions to all CTVs (Phase 1), with P+SV consecutive boost of 24.7 Gy in 13 fractions. Daily online image guidance was performed using bony landmarks and intraprostatic markers. Feasibility criteria included delivery of intended doses in 80% of patients, 95% of CTV displacements incorporated within PTV during Phase 1, and acute toxicity rate comparable to that of lower-dose pelvic techniques. Results: A total of 91 patients (88%) received the total prescription dose. All patients received at least 72 Gy. In Phase 1, 63 patients (61%) received the intended 55.1 Gy, whereas 87% of patients received at least 50 Gy. Dose reductions were caused by small bowel and rectal wall constraints. All CTVs received the planned dose in >95% of treatment fractions. There were no Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute toxicities greater than Grade 3, although there were five incidences equivalent to Grade 3 within a median follow-up of 23 months. Conclusion: These results suggest that dose escalation to the PLN+P+SV using IMRT is feasible, with acceptable rates of acute toxicity. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 483
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New technological aspects of irradiation for prostate cancer. Techniques of image-guided and intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Ganswindt, U.
    Bamberg, M.
    Belka, C.
    ONKOLOGE, 2007, 13 (08): : 710 - 717
  • [42] Feasibility of intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer
    Nam P Nguyen
    Siyoung Jang
    Jacqueline Vock
    Vincent Vinh-Hung
    Alexander Chi
    Paul Vos
    Judith Pugh
    Richard A Vo
    Misty Ceizyk
    Anand Desai
    Lexie Smith-Raymond
    BMC Cancer, 14
  • [43] Combination of Dose Escalation with Technological Advances (Intensity-Modulated and Image-Guided Radiotherapy) Is Not Associated with Increased Morbidity for Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Pinkawa, Michael
    Piroth, Marc D.
    Holy, Richard
    Djukic, Victoria
    Klotz, Jens
    Krenkel, Barbara
    Eble, Michael J.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 (08) : 479 - 484
  • [44] Feasibility of intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer
    Nguyen, Nam P.
    Jang, Siyoung
    Vock, Jacqueline
    Vincent Vinh-Hung
    Chi, Alexander
    Vos, Paul
    Pugh, Judith
    Vo, Richard A.
    Ceizyk, Misty
    Desai, Anand
    Smith-Raymond, Lexie
    BMC CANCER, 2014, 14
  • [45] Radiotherapy Quality Assurance for the CHHiP Trial: Conventional Versus Hypofractionated High-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer
    Naismith, O.
    Mayles, H.
    Bidmead, M.
    Clark, C. H.
    Gulliford, S.
    Hassan, S.
    Khoo, V
    Roberts, K.
    South, C.
    Hall, E.
    Dearnaley, D.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 31 (09) : 611 - 620
  • [46] A review of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal tumors
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Lovelock, D. Michael
    Bilsky, Mark H.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 61 (02) : 226 - 235
  • [47] Improvement in toxicity in high risk prostate cancer patients treated with image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy without daily image guidance
    Sveistrup, Joen
    af Rosenschold, Per Munck
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Oh, Jung Hun
    Pommer, Tobias
    Petersen, Peter Meidahl
    Engelholm, Svend Aage
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [48] Improvement in toxicity in high risk prostate cancer patients treated with image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy without daily image guidance
    Joen Sveistrup
    Per Munck af Rosenschöld
    Joseph O Deasy
    Jung Hun Oh
    Tobias Pommer
    Peter Meidahl Petersen
    Svend Aage Engelholm
    Radiation Oncology, 9
  • [49] Comparison of Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes of High-dose Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy for Patients With Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Pei, Xin
    Hunt, Margie
    Cohen, Gilad
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Zaider, Marco
    UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (04) : 986 - 990
  • [50] Patient reported toxicity and quality of life after hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for intermediate- and high risk prostate cancer
    Houben, Jeroen
    McColl, Gill
    Kaanders, Johannes Ham
    Smeenk, Robert J.
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 29 : 40 - 46