Shaking table model test on Shanghai World Financial Center Tower

被引:97
|
作者
Lu, Xilin [1 ]
Zou, Yun
Lu, Wensheng
Zhao, Bin
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, State Key Lab Disaster Reduct Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] So Yangtze Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
super-tall building; scaled model; shaking table test; seismic behaviour;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.634
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The height of 101-storey Shanghai World Financial Center Tower is 492m above ground making it possible the tallest building in the world when completed. Three parallel structural systems including mega-frame structure, reinforced concrete and braced steel services core and outrigger trusses, are combined to resist vertical and lateral loads. The building could be classified as a vertically irregular structure due to a number of stiffened and transfer stories in the building. Complexities related to structural system layout are mainly exhibited in the design of services core, mega-diagonals and outrigger trusses. According to Chinese Code, the height of the building clearly exceeds the stipulated maximum height of 190 m for a composite frame/reinforced concrete core building. The aspect ratio of height to width also exceeds the stipulated limit of 7 for seismic design intensity 7. A 1/50 scaled model is made and tested on shaking table under a series of one and two-dimensional base excitations with gradually increasing acceleration amplitudes. This paper presents the dynamic characteristics, the seismic responses and the failure mechanism of the structure. The test results demonstrate that the structural system is a good solution to withstand earthquakes. The inter-storey drift and the overall behaviour meet the requirements of Chinese Design Code. Furthermore, weak positions under seldom-occurred earthquakes of seismic design intensity 8 are found based on the visible damages on the testing model, and some corresponding suggestions are proposed for the engineering design of the structure under extremely strong earthquake. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 457
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shaking table model test of Beijing LG Building
    State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    不详
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao, 2006, 2 (10-14+39):
  • [22] Shaking table test of multi-tower self-anchored suspension bridge
    Zhang, Chao
    Fang, Zhen-zheng
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2013, 353-356 : 2216 - 2220
  • [23] Shaking table model test study of tunnel through fault
    Fang Lin
    Jiang Shu-ping
    Lin Zhi
    Wang Fang-qi
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2011, 32 (09) : 2709 - +
  • [24] ANALYSIS OF MODEL EMBANKMENT DAM BY SHAKING TABLE TEST.
    Kikusawa, Masahiro
    Hasegawa, Takashi
    Soils and Foundations, 1985, 25 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [25] Shaking table model test for framed anchors in landslide prevention
    Wang Ban-qiao
    Li Nan
    Men Yu-ming
    Zhang Miao-zhi
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2018, 39 (03) : 782 - +
  • [26] Shaking table test on a frame structure model of SCOPE system
    Zhou Y.
    Feng J.
    Cai J.
    Cao Y.
    Zhang Q.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2022, 43 (07): : 100 - 110
  • [27] Shaking Table Test of Isolated Structure Model with Small Scale
    Fu, Weiqing
    Chen, Fei
    Ding, Lin
    ADVANCED BUILDING MATERIALS, PTS 1-4, 2011, 250-253 (1-4): : 2036 - +
  • [28] Shaking table model test design for new Tianjin library
    Deng, Zhen-Dan
    Jiang, Xin-Liang
    Han, Yang
    Han, Ning
    Jiang, X.-L. (jiangxinliang@126.com), 1600, Tsinghua University (29): : 145 - 149
  • [29] Shaking table model test on slope dynamic deformation and failure
    Liu Han-xiang
    Xu Qiang
    Xu Hong-biao
    Zou Wei
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2011, 32 : 334 - 339
  • [30] Similitude Material Confecting of Tunnel Model in Shaking Table Test
    Deng, Xiaoning
    Jiang, Yunhui
    Wang, Zhijia
    Liu, Feicheng
    Zhang, Jianjing
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-4, 2014, 501-504 : 1774 - +