共 50 条
Phase III Trial Comparing Vinflunine With Docetaxel in Second-Line Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy
被引:51
|作者:
Krzakowski, Maciej
Ramlau, Rodryg
Jassem, Jacek
Szczesna, Aleksandra
Zatloukal, Petr
Von Pawel, Joachim
Sun, Xushan
Bennouna, Jaafar
Santoro, Armando
Biesma, Bonne
Delgado, Francois M.
Salhi, Yacine
Vaissiere, Nathalie
Hansen, Olfred
Tan, Eng-Huat
Quoix, Elisabeth
Garrido, Pilar
Douillard, Jean-Yves
机构:
[1] Ctr Onkol Inst, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Reg Lung Dis Hosp, Poznan, Poland
[3] Med Acad Gdansk, Radiotherapy Clin, Gdansk, Poland
[4] Samodzielmy Wojewodzki Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej, Otwock, Poland
[5] Klin Pneumol Brudni Chir, Prague, Czech Republic
[6] Asklepios Fachkliniken Munchen, Gauting, Germany
[7] Hop Andre Boulloche, Montbeliard, France
[8] Ctr Rene Gauducheau, St Herblain, France
[9] Inst Rech Pierre Fabre, Boulogne, France
[10] Hop Lyautey, Strasbourg, France
[11] Inst Clin Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
[12] Jeroen Boch Ziekenhuis, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
[13] Odense Univ Hosp, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[14] Natl Canc Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[15] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
关键词:
SUPPORTIVE CARE;
VINORELBINE;
REGIMENS;
THERAPY;
D O I:
10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4146
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Purpose To compare vinflunine (VFL) to docetaxel in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have experienced treatment failure with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Randomized, multicenter, phase III study, 551 patients received either vinflunine 320 mg/m(2) or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days until disease progression or serious toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The noninferiority analysis was based on a 10% difference (types I/II error rates: 5%/20%). Secondary end points included response rate (ORR), response duration, overall survival (OS), clinical benefit, quality of life (QOL), and safety. Results Median PFS was 2.3 months for each arm (HR, 1.004; 95% CI, 0.841 to 1.199). ORR, stable disease, median OS, were 4.4% versus 5.5%, 36.0% versus 39.6%, 6.7 versus 7.2 months (HR, 0.973; 95% CI, 0.805 to 1.176), respectively. No significant difference in patient benefit and QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung). No unexpected adverse events were observed. Grade higher than 0 (vinflunine v docetaxel) anemia (82.1% v 79.8%), neutropenia (49.3 v 39.02%), thrombocytopenia (30.6% v 14.3%), febrile neutropenia (3.3% v 4.7%), constipation (39.2% v 11.7%), fatigue (36.6% v 33.9%), injection site reaction (31.9% v 0.7%), nausea (26.7% v 23.7%), vomiting (23.8% v 14.2%), alopecia (19.8% v 35.4%), stomatis (19.4% v 12.4%), abdominal pain (20.1% v 3.6%), myalgia (14.7% v 6.6%), peripheral neuropathy (10.7% v 15.0%), arthralgia (7.0% v 7.7%), diarrhea (6.2% v 12.4%), edema (1.5% v 5.4%), and nail disorders (1.1% v 5;1%) were observed. Conclusion This noninferiority phase III study showed similar efficacy end points for vinflunine and docetaxel. Despite higher rates of some adverse effects (anemia, abdominal pain, constipation, fatigue) the overall toxicity profile of vinflunine was manageable. Therefore, VFL may be another option in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.
引用
收藏
页码:2167 / 2173
页数:7
相关论文