Knowing what You Know: valid and validated confidence sets in multiclass and multilabel prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Cauchois, Maxime [1 ]
Gupta, Suyash [1 ]
Duchi, John C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Multilabel and Multiclass Classification; Conformal Inference; Validity; Quantile Regression; Graphical Models; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We develop conformal prediction methods for constructing valid predictive confidence sets in multiclass and multilabel problems without assumptions on the data generating distribution. A challenge here is that typical conformal prediction methods-which give marginal validity (coverage) guarantees-provide uneven coverage, in that they address easy examples at the expense of essentially ignoring difficult examples. By leveraging ideas from quantile regression, we build methods that always guarantee correct coverage but additionally provide (asymptotically consistent) conditional coverage for both multiclass and multilabel prediction problems. To address the potential challenge of exponentially large confidence sets in multilabel prediction, we build tree-structured classifiers that efficiently account for interactions between labels. Our methods can be bolted on top of any classification model-neural network, random forest, boosted tree-to guarantee its validity. We also provide an empirical evaluation, simultaneously providing new validation methods, that suggests the more robust coverage of our confidence sets.
引用
收藏
页数:42
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Knowing what you know: improving metacomprehension and calibration accuracy in digital text
    Reid, Alan J.
    Morrison, Gary R.
    Bol, Linda
    ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 65 (01): : 29 - 45
  • [22] Knowing what you know: improving metacomprehension and calibration accuracy in digital text
    Alan J. Reid
    Gary R. Morrison
    Linda Bol
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 2017, 65 : 29 - 45
  • [23] Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know.
    Gordon, David
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2020, 145 (12) : 98 - 99
  • [24] MATCHING THE 'KNOWING WHAT TO DO' AND THE 'DOING WHAT YOU KNOW' IN ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING
    Loh, Chang-Yuan
    Wong, Jin Boon
    AUSTRALASIAN ACCOUNTING BUSINESS AND FINANCE JOURNAL, 2009, 3 (02)
  • [25] Knowing what to do and doing what you know: A comparison of daily living skills measures in schizophrenia
    Ziwich, Rachel
    Jalbrzikowski, Maria
    Saccente, Erica
    Forchelli, Gina
    Javitt, Daniel C.
    Revheim, Nadine
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 63 (07) : 268S - 269S
  • [26] Pedagogical tact. Knowing what to do when you don't know what to do
    Rothuizen, Jan Jaap
    PHENOMENOLOGY & PRACTICE, 2018, 12 (01): : 72 - 74
  • [27] Knowing What You Know in Brain Segmentation Using Bayesian Deep Neural Networks
    McClure, Patrick
    Rho, Nao
    Lee, John A.
    Kaczmarzyk, Jakub R.
    Zheng, Charles
    Ghosh, Satrajit S.
    Nielson, Dylan
    Thomas, Adam G.
    Bandettini, Peter
    Pereira, Francisco
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2019, 13
  • [28] "(Not) knowing what you know": Exploring educators' perceptions of critical thinking in occupational therapy
    Gilfillan, Jemma
    Irvine-Brown, Laura
    Di Tommaso, Amelia
    Malfitano, Ana Paula Serrata
    Farias, Lisette
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2024, 31 (01)
  • [29] Knowing what you don't know? Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research
    Schultze, U
    Stabell, C
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2004, 41 (04) : 549 - 573
  • [30] Knowing What You Know: Calibrating Dialogue Belief State Distributions via Ensembles
    van Niekerk, Carel y
    Heck, Michael
    Geishauser, Christian
    Lin, Hsien-Chin
    Lubis, Nurul
    Moresi, Marco
    Gasic, Milica
    FINDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, EMNLP 2020, 2020,