Pramipexole to Improve Cognition in Bipolar Disorder A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:4
|
作者
Van Meter, Anna R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Perez-Rodriguez, M. Mercedes [4 ]
Braga, Raphael J. [1 ,3 ]
Shanahan, Megan [5 ]
Hanna, Lauren [1 ,3 ]
Malhotra, Anil K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Burdick, Katherine E. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Zucker Hillside Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Glen Oaks, NY 11004 USA
[2] Feinstein Inst Med Res, Inst Behav Sci, Manhasset, NY USA
[3] Donald & Barbara Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Hempstead, NY USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Mood & Psychosis Res Program, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
bipolar disorder; pramipexole; cognition; randomized controlled trial; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; DECISION-MAKING; RATING-SCALE; DYSFUNCTION; IMPAIRMENT; RELIABILITY; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1097/JCP.0000000000001407
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background Adults with bipolar disorder (BD) often experience neurocognitive impairment that negatively impacts functioning and quality of life. Previous trials have found that dopamine agonist agents improve cognition in healthy volunteers and that adults with BD who have stable mood and mild cognitive deficits may also benefit. We hypothesized that pramipexole, a dopamine agonist, would improve neurocognitive function in patients with BD. Methods We recruited 60 adults (aged 18-65 years) with a diagnosis of BD I or II for an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02397837). All had stable mood and clinically significant neurocognitive impairment at baseline. Participants were randomized to receive pramipexole (n = 31) or a placebo (n = 29), dose was initiated at 0.125 mg 2 times a day and increased to a target of 4.5 mg/d. Results At trial end, the primary outcome, MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery composite score, had not improved more in the pramipexole group (mean [SD] = 1.15 [5.4]) than in the placebo group (mean [SD] = 4.12 [5.2], Cohen's d = 0.56, P = 0.049), and mixed models, controlling for symptoms, showed no association between treatment group and MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery scores. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions These results suggest that pramipexole is not an efficacious cognitive enhancement agent in BD, even in a sample enriched for characteristics that were associated with a beneficial response in prior work. There are distinct cognitive subgroups among adults with BD and may be related differences in neurobiology that affect response to pramipexole. Additional research to better understand the onset and nature of the cognitive deficits in people with BD will be an important step toward a more personalized approach to treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 427
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enhanced Fidelity to Treatment for Bipolar Disorder: Results From a Randomized Controlled Implementation Trial
    Waxmonsky, Jeanette
    Kilbourne, Amy M.
    Goodrich, David E.
    Nord, Kristina M.
    Lai, Zongshan
    Laird, Christina
    Clogston, Julia
    Kim, Hyungjin Myra
    Miller, Christopher
    Bauer, Mark S.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2014, 65 (01) : 81 - 90
  • [32] A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation and d-cycloserine for individuals with bipolar disorder
    Nicholas JK Breitborde
    Spencer C Dawson
    Cindy Woolverton
    David Dawley
    Emily K Bell
    Kaila Norman
    Angelina Polsinelli
    Beth Bernstein
    Pamela Mirsky
    Christine Pletkova
    Felix Grucci
    Carly Montoya
    Bernard Nanadiego
    Ehsan Sarabi
    Michael DePalma
    Francisco Moreno
    [J]. BMC Psychology, 2 (1)
  • [33] Group psychoeducation for persons with bipolar disorder in Rwanda: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Musoni-Rwililiza, E.
    Arnbjerg, C. J.
    Murekatete, C.
    Carlsson, J.
    Kallestrup, P.
    Gishoma, D.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [34] Improving medical and psychiatric outcomes among individuals with bipolar disorder: A Randomized controlled trial
    Kilbourne, Amy M.
    Post, Edward P.
    Nossek, Agnes
    Drill, Larry
    Cooley, Susan
    Bauer, Mark S.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2008, 59 (07) : 760 - 768
  • [35] A randomized controlled trial of integrated group therapy for patients with bipolar disorder & substance dependence
    Weiss, RD
    Griffin, ML
    Kolodziej, ME
    Janis, IB
    Hennen, J
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 29 (05) : 158A - 158A
  • [36] Online psycho-education to the treatment of bipolar disorder: protocol of a randomized controlled trial
    Itxaso González-Ortega
    Amaia Ugarte
    Sonia Ruiz de Azúa
    Nuria Núñez
    Marta Zubia
    Sara Ponce
    Patricia Casla
    Josu Xabier Llano
    Ángel Faria
    Ana González-Pinto
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 16
  • [37] Improving general medical care for patients with bipolar disorder: A randomized, controlled effectiveness trial
    Kilbourne, Amy M.
    Bauer, Mark S.
    Nossek, Agnes
    Drill, Larry J.
    Cooley, Susan
    Post, Edward P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 10 : S21 - S22
  • [38] Online psycho-education to the treatment of bipolar disorder: protocol of a randomized controlled trial
    Gonzalez-Ortega, Itxaso
    Ugarte, Amaia
    Ruiz de Azua, Sonia
    Nunez, Nuria
    Zubia, Marta
    Ponce, Sara
    Casla, Patricia
    Xabier Llano, Josu
    Faria, Angel
    Gonzalez-Pinto, Ana
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 16
  • [39] Group psychoeducation for persons with bipolar disorder in Rwanda: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    E. Musoni-Rwililiza
    C. J. Arnbjerg
    C. Murekatete
    J. Carlsson
    P. Kallestrup
    D. Gishoma
    [J]. Trials, 23
  • [40] Efficacy of an integrative approach for bipolar disorder: preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial
    Valls, Elia
    Mar Bonnin, C.
    Torres, Imma
    Brat, Merce
    Prime-Tous, Mireia
    Morilla, Ivette
    Segu, Xavier
    Sole, Brisa
    Torrent, Carla
    Vieta, Eduard
    Martinez-Aran, Anabel
    Reinares, Maria
    Sanchez-Moreno, Jose
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 52 (16) : 4094 - 4105