Comparison of Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Diabetic Patients

被引:3
|
作者
Dheeraj, Dheeraj [1 ]
Chauhan, Udit [2 ]
Khapre, Meenakshi [3 ]
Kant, Ravi [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Gen Med, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Radiol Intervent Radiol, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Social Prevent Med, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, India
关键词
bone mineral density; quantitative computed tomography; dexa scan; osteoporosis; diabetes mellitus; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; AORTIC CALCIFICATION; FRACTURE RISK; DISCORDANCE; MELLITUS; ADULTS; TYPE-1; SCORE; FRAX; DXA;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.23131
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Diabetes mellitus (DM) adversely affects the skeletal system and is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in osteoporosis detection in patients with DM. Methods A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at the diabetic clinic of a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India. A total of 30 individuals with DM were subjected to spinal QCT and lumbar spine and hip dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios of QCT were measured against DXA and the diagnostic discordance between QCT and DXA was investigated. Results QCT, compared to the gold standard DXA, has a sensitivity/specificity of 92.8% (95% CI 92.4%-93.2%)/81.2% (95% CI 80.6%-81.8%). The PPV/NPV of QCT was 81.2% (95% CI 80.6%-81.8%)/92.8% (95% CI 92.4%-93.2%). The positive likelihood ratio/negative likelihood ratio was 4.95 (95% CI 4.79-5.11)/0.087 (95% CI 0.082-0.093). Area under the curve was 0.871 (95% CI 0.731-1.00). Minor diagnostic discordance was present in 36.6% of patients with diabetes. Conclusion The current study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of QCT in osteoporosis detection in people with diabetes. DXA is the gold standard diagnostic tool; however, its availability is limited. The current study showed that QCT is an excellent diagnostic tool. Based on these results, this study recommends that QCT may serve as a problem-solving investigation tool where DXA is unavailable, or it may be the primary investigation tool for bone mineral density measurement and osteoporosis detection if a dedicated DXA scanner is inaccessible. This study also recommends further investigating the feasibility of opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine abdominal and chest CT. Finally, considering the silent nature of osteoporosis and the high prevalence of osteoporosis in individuals with diabetes, a proactive approach is required in the screening of osteoporosis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bone mineral density and content: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry versus peripheral quantitative computed tomography
    Shedd, KM
    Hanson, KB
    Alekel, DL
    Hanson, LN
    Van Loan, MD
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2006, 20 (05): : A1062 - A1063
  • [32] Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the knee in spinal cord injury: methodology and correlation with quantitative computed tomography
    J G McPherson
    W B Edwards
    A Prasad
    K L Troy
    J W Griffith
    T J Schnitzer
    Spinal Cord, 2014, 52 : 821 - 825
  • [33] Comparative Assessment of Bone Mineral Measurements Using Dual X-ray Absorptiometry and Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography
    C. A. Formica
    J. W. Nieves
    F. Cosman
    P. Garrett
    R. Lindsay
    Osteoporosis International, 1998, 8 : 460 - 467
  • [34] Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Does Not Represent Bone Structure in Patients with Osteoporosis A Comparison of Lumbar Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry with Vertebral Biopsies
    Pumberger, Matthias
    Palmowski, Yannick
    Strube, Patrick
    Schwemmer, Christin
    Roll, Stephanie
    Zippelius, Timo
    Putzier, Michael
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (13) : 861 - 866
  • [35] Radiological assessment of body composition in patients with cirrhosis: A comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography imaging
    Chew, M.
    Sinclair, M.
    Gow, P.
    Hey, P.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 : 63 - 63
  • [36] Comparison of Muscle Mass Indices Using Computed Tomography or Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry for Predicting Physical Performance in Hemodialysis Patients
    Kang, Seok Hui
    Lee, Hyun Seok
    Lee, Sukyung
    Cho, Ji-Hyung
    Kim, Jun Chul
    KIDNEY & BLOOD PRESSURE RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (06): : 1119 - 1127
  • [37] OSTEOPOROSIS - DIAGNOSIS WITH LATERAL AND POSTEROANTERIOR DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY COMPARED WITH QUANTITATIVE CT
    GUGLIELMI, G
    GRIMSTON, SK
    FISCHER, KC
    PACIFICI, R
    RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (03) : 845 - 850
  • [38] Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry
    El-Desouki, MI
    Sherafzal, MS
    Othman, SA
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (09) : 1346 - 1350
  • [39] Osteopenia and Osteoporosis Screening Detection: Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound with and without Calibration Factor Comparison to Gold Standard Dual X-ray Absorptiometry
    Moonkum, Nutthapong
    Withayanuluck, Thanat
    Somarungsan, Arun
    Sichai, Naphondej
    Wongsiri, Arisa
    Chawkhaodin, Witchayada
    Ruengdach, Podjana
    Boonsuk, Pasinee
    Pukdeeyorng, Marut
    Tochaikul, Gunjanaporn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2024, 27 (02)
  • [40] Assessment of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Methods with Biochemical Markers in Lumbar and Femoral Osteoporosis Diagnosis
    Gencbay, Mualla Bicer
    Isiksacan, Nilgun
    Sarikaya, Nese OlMez
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF BAKIRKOY, 2019, 15 (01) : 115 - 122